It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
So basically at this point, hours later, all I have are 3 people that dont agree, and still no explanation as to the reasoning behind the behavior.
Well I did get one member accusing me of racism because I was unwilling to further explain an off topic subject to his liking even though I provided the proof behind my premise, as said member is either trolling or absolutely living under a rock and also computer illiterate to the point of not being able to google search the info they wanted me to spoon feed them.
So as of right now, this thread is a failure.
I simply want to know the reasoning behind playing the race/sexism card if someone disagrees with anyone that is a white male, this is not even a complicated question in the least, nor is it some kind of "tactic" with an agenda.
I just dont understand, and seek clarification.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Could you show me an example? Because most people I've seen be called a racist, usually are and it's not for just 'disagreeing' with a minority. But hey I'd like to see your sources and evidence so let me have it!
Originally posted by Propulsion
My friend, if you are going to try to knock sense into a liberal, you will only find yourself getting nowhere real fast!
Here is an example:
Ever try to talk facts to a liberal when the subject is global warming? Never mind that the best conservative authorities have shown that their data is all fudged from the same broken thermometer stuck in some prof's window at Berkeley; if you show them the real data which shows that we're actually going into an ice age, they just change terminology and start babbling about "climate change"! As if a global ice age presented some kind of "problem" we needed to spend vast amounts of our tax dollars to "solve", when all it really means is lower cooling bills in the summer and easier storage for deer meat after a good hunt. When arguing with a liberal, there's just no point in bringing up these facts because, as the notorious Nazi sympathizer Heidegger liked to say, the time for decisions is over!
You will never win! It’s just the way it is..
Originally posted by Propulsion
My friend, if you are going to try to knock sense into a liberal, you will only find yourself getting nowhere real fast!
Here is an example:
Ever try to talk facts to a liberal when the subject is global warming? Never mind that the best conservative authorities have shown that their data is all fudged from the same broken thermometer stuck in some prof's window at Berkeley; if you show them the real data which shows that we're actually going into an ice age, they just change terminology and start babbling about "climate change"! As if a global ice age presented some kind of "problem" we needed to spend vast amounts of our tax dollars to "solve", when all it really means is lower cooling bills in the summer and easier storage for deer meat after a good hunt. When arguing with a liberal, there's just no point in bringing up these facts because, as the notorious Nazi sympathizer Heidegger liked to say, the time for decisions is over!
You will never win! It’s just the way it is..
Originally posted by BobM88
reply to post by inverslyproportional
No offense, but to quote Ben Kenobi from the first Star Wars movie..."Who's the bigger fool, the fool, or the fool who follows him?"
Just because someone implies you're something, or ignores what you show them doesn't mean anything other than you are letting them yank your chain.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by inverslyproportional
First, please stop calling them liberals... they are authoritarians, or progressives. There is nothing "liberal" about them, and they sure as hell could care less about the advancement of liberty, therefore they are not Liberals. Having said that, although I absolutely agree with you, you are only bringing more light to the absurdity of this subject. The reason "liberals" cry racist is because they can not defeat an argument based in rational thought and critical thinking with their irrational, pseudo-intellectual, emotionally based arguments. They cry racist because it is meant to distract from the point that they are losing a debate, and so by calling you a racist they hope to take the power in the debate by putting you on the defensive. The best way to deal with this tactic is to ignore it and not defend yourself, because then you bring validity to this last resort tactic.
Wow. Now that there is some generalizing. Name calling is now the forte of "neo-cons"?
CJ
Some time back, some ATSer put up a thread cutting down Bush. Now I have no love for Bush AT ALL, but I also addressed the fact that I had no love for Obama either. I told my fellow ATSers that Bush and Obama should have been dragged out from the WH and been hung from a tree. Now I must repeat, I said BOTH Bush and Obama. Not ONE (1) person said there was a problem with hanging Bush, but to throw Obama in the mix? You have NO idea what kind of backlash I got from the statement! The last thing on my mind was racism, but EVERYONE else thought different! Really, I should have known better.
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
Originally posted by Propulsion
My friend, if you are going to try to knock sense into a liberal, you will only find yourself getting nowhere real fast!
Here is an example:
Ever try to talk facts to a liberal when the subject is global warming? Never mind that the best conservative authorities have shown that their data is all fudged from the same broken thermometer stuck in some prof's window at Berkeley; if you show them the real data which shows that we're actually going into an ice age, they just change terminology and start babbling about "climate change"! As if a global ice age presented some kind of "problem" we needed to spend vast amounts of our tax dollars to "solve", when all it really means is lower cooling bills in the summer and easier storage for deer meat after a good hunt. When arguing with a liberal, there's just no point in bringing up these facts because, as the notorious Nazi sympathizer Heidegger liked to say, the time for decisions is over!
You will never win! It’s just the way it is..
I believe our right, after all, the same guy keeps coming back to imply i am a racist and demand evidence about Susan Rice lying on 5 shows, even though I gave him a youtube video of her doing it. Not to mention, I have never one time made a single racist remark in these forums yet he accuses me of it, instead of simply relaying his response about the question posed in the OP.
Then goes on to try to paint me as some extremist etc... all the while not even seeing that he is committing the exact same behavior I was asking about.
BTW very nice avi, I love the regular show, I watch it every day with my kids.
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by inverslyproportional
First, please stop calling them liberals... they are authoritarians, or progressives. There is nothing "liberal" about them, and they sure as hell could care less about the advancement of liberty, therefore they are not Liberals. Having said that, although I absolutely agree with you, you are only bringing more light to the absurdity of this subject. The reason "liberals" cry racist is because they can not defeat an argument based in rational thought and critical thinking with their irrational, pseudo-intellectual, emotionally based arguments. They cry racist because it is meant to distract from the point that they are losing a debate, and so by calling you a racist they hope to take the power in the debate by putting you on the defensive. The best way to deal with this tactic is to ignore it and not defend yourself, because then you bring validity to this last resort tactic.
Wow. Now that there is some generalizing. Name calling is now the forte of "neo-cons"?
CJ
Speaking of generalizing.... anyway, I wouldn't know, I despise neo-cons much more than "liberals", so you would have to ask a neo-con. I was not generalizing at all, because the term Liberal is a mainstream media cliche, and they have redefined the term. The only thing modern day liberals are "liberal" about is abortion and gay marriage... everything else they want to control and regulate. Look at Mayor Bloomberg in NYC... he believes in a woman's "right to choose" when it comes to abortion, but if that same woman wants to choose a super big gulp at 7-11 then she doesn't have that right, because he has deemed soda as being bad for you (and it is), but he feels the need to regulate that for her own good, but the media will refer to him a a "liberal". The fact that you immediately defaulted to me being a neo-con because I said something bad about "liberals" just goes to show that you are intellectually incapable of understanding what true liberty is and that you still mentally exist within the mental enslavement of the two party paradigm.... so have fun with that.
Originally posted by Propulsion
My friend, if you are going to try to knock sense into a liberal, you will only find yourself getting nowhere real fast!
Here is an example:
Ever try to talk facts to a liberal when the subject is global warming? Never mind that the best conservative authorities have shown that their data is all fudged from the same broken thermometer stuck in some prof's window at Berkeley; if you show them the real data which shows that we're actually going into an ice age, they just change terminology and start babbling about "climate change"! As if a global ice age presented some kind of "problem" we needed to spend vast amounts of our tax dollars to "solve", when all it really means is lower cooling bills in the summer and easier storage for deer meat after a good hunt. When arguing with a liberal, there's just no point in bringing up these facts because, as the notorious Nazi sympathizer Heidegger liked to say, the time for decisions is over!
You will never win! It’s just the way it is..
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
Is it simply politics, or do liberals really think that the only reason to ever question someones actions is race and or sex based?
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Could you show me an example? Because most people I've seen be called a racist, usually are and it's not for just 'disagreeing' with a minority. But hey I'd like to see your sources and evidence so let me have it!
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Thanks for the bounty of evidence this may take all night!
Originally posted by ltheghost
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Could you show me an example? Because most people I've seen be called a racist, usually are and it's not for just 'disagreeing' with a minority. But hey I'd like to see your sources and evidence so let me have it!
Okay! I'll throw an easy one out there. That most liberals like myself see as an racist agenda. Back in 2007 President Bush running the country. Wars. The Economy was in a NOSE dive. Just a bunch of very bad stuff was happening (Housing Bubble) you know, but then 2008 Obama was elected as President. And then out of NO where, here comes the Tea Party. Really? Now they care about fiscal responsibility? They didn't even exist when Bush was running the country, but the second a Black Man gets in office they are holding protests and rallies? And lets not get on those Obama is a Kenyan Muslim Witch doctor signs they were holding up.
Or even comparing him to Hitler. In my honest opinion I thought white people were losing their minds. Fox News turned into KKK-lite in my eyes. Have you watched Hannity? Its hard to watch living hatred. And what did Obama do? He gave us a form of Universal Healthcare? That's why people are buying guns like crazy? Then we get to the re-election and the Republicans pick the WHITEST WHITE MAN in human history. Who they didn't even like! Why? Why not Ron Paul or Herman Cain? Mitt Romney? Who was the most elite souless human being on the planet. RACISM. It doesn't make sense but that is my only explanation for this crazy behavior. Now Romney is blaming his lost on minorities, women, and young voters who are getting gifts from Obama, that's why we voted for him. (Ignoring the fact that he is a major jerk and loser) Racism. So, when Republicans get all riled up and start talking about the Country is dead, I can't shake the reason they are saying this is because of racism. I'm sorry this is just my honest opinion. I can't for the life of me understand what Obama has done to have people running over their husbands or even committing suicide because he is President.
Its the level of hatred that has my racism senses tingling.
Originally posted by ltheghost
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
Is it simply politics, or do liberals really think that the only reason to ever question someones actions is race and or sex based?
The Right has been for the past couple of years extremely racist, sexist, and homophobic. For example (here we go), "All Blacks voted for Obama in 2008 because he is Black) Not true. Black people have been voting for democrats in high numbers for decades. Lets not ignore the fact that no one liked McCain or PALIN!. The total disrespect white GOP men have shown the nation's first Black President has been disgusting. We tend not to forget that whole "You lie" mess at the State of the Union. For the Sexist part, "Legitimate Rape and a pregnancy from a rape is a gift from God". I think I can rest my case there. And being the major party for homophobic crazy Christians. Then we look at the leaders of the party. Rush Limbaugh, Fox News (Minus Shepard Smith), Mitch "We will make him a one term President" O'Connell (TurtleMan), Sarah Palin, and the TEA PARTY (And their wonderful misspelled racist "Obamah is a Mooslim) signs. Their stances on immigration (Arizona's Nazi Let's see your papers law).
I don't believe all Republicans are racist, sexist, or homophobic. But I do believe most racists, sexists, and homophobic people are Republicans.