Documentary says serial killer involved in OJ Simpson case!!!!

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 01:30 PM
link   

A criminal profiler says paintings by convicted killer Glen Rogers suggest he was involved in the 1994 murders of O.J. Simpson's ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.


Source.....news.msn.com...


IF this happens to be true all the people who called for his hanging and ruined his life should think long hard about things....

edit on 20-11-2012 by King Seesar because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   
reply to post by King Seesar
 


first off a serial killer usually does his killings for fame so linking his name to the craziest murder case ever would cement his name in history. I think most likely he will be found a liar. Given the amount of time and books and material witnessed by the public it will make it hard to prove he isn't the killer but I think hes a lying



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 01:44 PM
link   
I was attending a POST academy shortly after the OJ trial. My instructor was a retired LA PD officer who had friends in the LA Sheriffs dept. These friends were assigned to escort OJ during his trial. Our instructor informed us that one morning before court they were all having coffee at a dinner when they asked OJ how he did it. OJ told them that since nothing he said could be used against him, for if they brought it up in court he would plea "Jail house confession", then he did kill the both of them. My instructor refused to go into details as to how though. From the mouth of an ex LA PD to his class, take it for what its worth.



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 01:47 PM
link   
reply to post by digital01anarchy
 


It's true what you say that's why i preferenced my opening post with IF, linking your self to the biggest murder trial will make people want to watch this documentary more, but i was always open to the assumption that OJ might not be gulity, so what if this serial killer turns out to be the killer wow is all i can say.



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 01:57 PM
link   
Yeah, well if the convicted killer that this documentary is about hasn't confessed....then it's all just conjecture. And I have doubts the killer who is the subject of the documentary confessed. But, I'll wait until after the documentary is shown and I've heard his confession.
edit on 20-11-2012 by kyred because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 04:42 PM
link   
Who cares at this point he got off!



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


It's true he did get off on the charges but if he was truly innocence then he had his life ruined by a witch hunt and what about the people who contributed to that????

I agree it's too early to know if this story is true but it is interesting and i didn't see any other thread about it on ATS so i figured it should at least be brought up.

edit on 20-11-2012 by King Seesar because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 08:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by King Seesar

A criminal profiler says paintings by convicted killer Glen Rogers suggest he was involved in the 1994 murders of O.J. Simpson's ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.


Source.....news.msn.com...


IF this happens to be true all the people who called for his hanging and ruined his life should think long hard about things....

edit on 20-11-2012 by King Seesar because: (no reason given)


He was aquitted of the crime, remember?

"If the glove doesn't fit, you must aquit!"

"OJ FOUND NOT GUILTY!"

No one ruined his life but himself, when, in an act of ridiculous stupidity he pulled guns on people. He was charged rightly for this crime, and sent to prison. You cannot link the two, they were seperate crimes.

OJ was doing fine after the aquittal. He committed the crime he did out of selfishness, because the alleged items he was after were things he supposedly sold or gave away to avoid paying damages in a civil suit to the Goldman family. He was broke on purpose, because you can't get blood from a turnip. He was hiding assets, and was attempting to "regain ownership" in an attempt to sell them under the table for hidden income which he would have purposely hidden from the courts to avoid paying on behalf of the civil suit.

IF this story was true, then he could have fought the civil suit legally and obtained relief in that fashion.

Instead, he wrote a book about how, "IF he did commit the murder, how he would have done it". Really?



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 08:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Libertygal
 


"If the glove doesn't fit, you must aquit!" classic....


I understand what you are saying and nobody told OJ to pull those guns on people but come on lets be honest if he wasn't accused and presumed guilty of killing Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman by everybody then his life takes a major turn and he probably still has TV gigs so the other crime would not have occurred, so you can say there not related but in a way they are....

Look i'm not saying that i think OJ was guilty or innocent, alls i'm saying is lets see where this documentary gos and take it from there.....

edit on 20-11-2012 by King Seesar because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by King Seesar
 


My entire point is that...

No matter what happens in life, we are all responsible for where we take ourselves.

It's an ultimate truth. No one or no thing made OJ *do* or *become* anything other than what he chose to do or become for himself.

I understand what you are trying to say, but it simply allows him to cry out "victim", when at some point in life, can't we all?

The ability to rise from that and become what we want and to move on encompasses who we are. Allowing life to dictate who we are and what we become, well, what more can I say?

We all pay our money and make our choices.

Choosing to make no choice is still making a choice.



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 09:24 PM
link   
reply to post by King Seesar
 
That’s funny; did people actually think OJ did it?



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by King Seesar
 


My entire point is that...

No matter what happens in life, we are all responsible for where we take ourselves.

It's an ultimate truth. No one or no thing made OJ *do* or *become* anything other than what he chose to do or become for himself.

I understand what you are trying to say, but it simply allows him to cry out "victim", when at some point in life, can't we all?

The ability to rise from that and become what we want and to move on encompasses who we are. Allowing life to dictate who we are and what we become, well, what more can I say?

We all pay our money and make our choices.

Choosing to make no choice is still making a choice.



I also understand your point and like i said nobody told OJ to hold somebody up at gun point i'm just trying to convey that it was a domino effect that lead to this, again it does not absolve him of it but in my opinion it was the ripple effect of what happen to his life which if he was innocent of any murders was not fair and that's basically what i'm trying to state.

It's funny because i think we are kind of debating the same point your saying OJ should take responsibility for the crime he was convicted of and i'm saying if it did come out that OJ was innocent of murder all his accusers
should take that same responsibility.



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 09:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by LastProphet527
reply to post by King Seesar
 
That’s funny; did people actually think OJ did it?




LOL, I dunno you tell me.



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by King Seesar

A criminal profiler says paintings by convicted killer Glen Rogers suggest he was involved in the 1994 murders of O.J. Simpson's ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.


Source.....news.msn.com...


IF this happens to be true all the people who called for his hanging and ruined his life should think long hard about things....

edit on 20-11-2012 by King Seesar because: (no reason given)


Yes, and all those people who called for his hanging and ruined his life should think long hard about things....as you should as well. Please read long and hard of 'If I Did It' found on the net, written by OJ. Let me know what you think about just WHO ruined his life, after you have read everything.
edit on 20-11-2012 by Gridrebel because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 10:47 PM
link   
OJ used to live in south Florida everywhere he went people would leave or complain that he was there. Although he was found guilty he was financially ruined. As far as the guns right or wrong after all that I had been through and someone had my things I would go Rambo too. Especially if I was innocent.



posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 11:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Gridrebel
 


I will read the book do you have a pdf link???



posted on Nov, 21 2012 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by King Seesar
 


Here is a link:

onemansblog.com...

DON'T do all the stuff with utorrent on top. Go down to the bottom, just under the video that is no longer accessible and select pdf, then save as to you computer



posted on Nov, 21 2012 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Gridrebel
 


Thanks for the link when i'm done reading the book i'll let you know what i think...


Also to anyone wondering the documentary we are talking about airs tonight November 21st 2012 on the ID (Investigation Discovery) channel from 9pm to 11pm eastern time and it's called My Brother The Serial Killer.



posted on Nov, 21 2012 @ 02:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by King Seesar

Originally posted by LastProphet527
reply to post by King Seesar
 
That’s funny; did people actually think OJ did it?




LOL, I dunno you tell me.

I always knew he was innocent...only a racist person would of thought he was guilty...I mean...what black man would kill 2 white people’ So common sense, and you don’t need a dream team to figure that out.



posted on Nov, 23 2012 @ 11:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by LastProphet527

Originally posted by King Seesar

Originally posted by LastProphet527
reply to post by King Seesar
 
That’s funny; did people actually think OJ did it?




LOL, I dunno you tell me.

I always knew he was innocent...only a racist person would of thought he was guilty...I mean...what black man would kill 2 white people’ So common sense, and you don’t need a dream team to figure that out.


your joking right?

most people assume the guilty flee when the cops show up at their door. Most people assume your guilty if you write a book titled "if I did it" most people assume your guilty when you have a motive for the crime. Most people assume OJ is a murder. Assumptions can be incorrect but lets put things into perspective. A: the Rodney King trial and the riots effect on this case without it OJ is in prison. B: violent behavior even after the murders C: the book he wrote D: the civil case found him guilty E; with the advent of another killer taking credit dont you think if he truly believed he was innocent he sue the court of his civil case? please the only racist is you because your the only one who brought race into a murder trial
edit on 23-11-2012 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join