It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by redtic
The fact that I require proof for these things to be true doesn't make me close-minded, but, on the contrary, imho makes me open-minded, but rationally and logically so.
Originally posted by Klassified
Both sides of this debate are as guilty as the other side. We have very few objective people on this site. Neither skeptics nor believers are objective, and they are both operating from a belief system. I see no pride in being labeled with either tag.
Everything cannot be explained with science, because our sciences are too young, as well as being in a constant state of change. What is scientific fact today, will be hogwash tomorrow when a new discovery is made.
Neither can everything be explained by faith, and personal experience. If it could, I'd still be a diehard, fundamentalist Christian. Instead, I'm an atheist.
Objectivity. If you'll notice, the word Cartesian is listed as my mood. It's because it is a reminder to me not to think my own beliefs are above questioning. It is also a reminder to me to be as objective as I can be. I still make my mistakes, and have my prejudices, but I strive to be objective in my approach to the topics here at ATS. No matter what that topic is.
Originally posted by redtic
reply to post by BlueMule
Wait, are you saying that these books possess peer-reviewed, scientific evidence of paranormal phenomenon? Evidence, apparently, that the scientific community chooses to ignore? That is monumental and historic.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Wait, are you saying that you have been just sitting on your lazy ass, expecting scientists to bring you peer-reviewed, scientific evidence on a silver platter if it exists? That is weak and foolish.
edit on 20-11-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by redtic
Originally posted by BlueMule
Wait, are you saying that you have been just sitting on your lazy ass, expecting scientists to bring you peer-reviewed, scientific evidence on a silver platter if it exists? That is weak and foolish.
edit on 20-11-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
While I won't stoop to your level of name calling, I will just say thank you for those book references - I will try to read them when I can as I am genuinely interested in this subject. Have a good one.