It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by netgamer7k
To know more about David Icke, check out what his opponents think about him:
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
There's nothing wrong with checking both sides of the coin about a particular person. I find the facts pointing towards that David Icke steals material, and makes ridiculous claims with little to no actual evidence supporting it. Both of these are facts about him, not opinions.
edit on 20-11-2012 by netgamer7k because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unidentified_Objective
I don't take anyone serious that bases outrageous claims on pure speculation and little to no collaborating evidence. As far as I'm concerned, he's in the business of entertaining and using whatever means necessary to sell books....be it making this claim or that claim with nothing in the way of proof....only circumstantial evidence or hearsay. Perhaps he just likes to provoke thought and thinks that's what he's doing. Perhaps he's just another nutter. Perhaps he says whatever he thinks will raise his income potential. (Just look at all the David Icke books on Amazon).
Originally posted by TheMindWar
reply to post by firefly9000
I believe in reptillians, every part of it makes sense to me. When we consider the fact that crocodiles survived from the dinosaur era, one can be forgiven in the belief that another more inteligent species has evolved oer the past 65 million years. For example the veloceraptor who it is believed used to have a "community type" leadership of sorts. (it is said they used to hunt in packs). Dinosaurs maybe throughout the galaxy.
That said, i agree with some of ickes claims and indeed he maybe correct in his assumptions, but if so that he is probably 60 years to soon. People are just not ready to talk about the "body computer" without ridicule. They are more wrapped up in eastenders and corrie.
Originally posted by Nephilim48
reply to post by Just Chris
You are very close to the truth when you mention evolution. For the organised religions to say that God created man in his image is utter nonsense. man has been evolving for millions of years.
I am a follower of The Source Foundation which you can find at www.thesourcefoundation.com
It believes that we are descended from the interbreeding of aliens with homosapiens which is why we are evolving and will continue to do so.
You may think it sounds far fetched but I would urge you to take a look at their site. It makes a lot of sense to any open minded person
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by TauCetixeta
The whole reptilian thing to me does not ring true. Yes things may be the way Icke says they are, he's dedicated his life's work to this subject, but we are missing that crucial thing called hard evidence. I've yet to see any. All we have is speculation, conjecture, dot-joining etc. Dodgy youtube video clips of "shape-shifting" politicians eyes are a joke in my opinion. Where's the solid proof? Icke seems to explain this by using terms related to dimensional phenomena, saying that the reptilians can do this and that. We have some evidence, for example, of UFO activity that seems to concur with the possibility of inter-dimensional travel but none of giant bipedal lizards, who are somehow in charge of our world leaders. I'd have to see a photograph or.....well anything that shows these things may be real, but so far there are none.
Does anybody have any input on Icke, pro or against? I'm not looking for bashing or praising. I'm ONLY interested in cold hard data as in: he said "XYZ" and this can be corroborated with the following... or not.
Originally posted by firefly9000
First, let me just say that although I've been spinning around the high strangeness arena for a while, Icke is a character I'm only vaguely familiar with.
Last night I was bored and started flipping aimlessly through Youtube. I came across some pieces from David Icke's 2012 Wembley Show.
As I often do, I started checking out his references to see if the man was at least making some informed speculations or just 'pie in the sky' accusations. Most of the research I did (very quickly mind you) checked out to some extent.
However, I find that he does a TON of speculation on a gram of truth (please chime in if you think I'm wrong).
Does anybody have any input on Icke, pro or against? I'm not looking for bashing or praising. I'm ONLY interested in cold hard data as in: he said "XYZ" and this can be corroborated with the following... or not.
In other words I'm looking for intelligent arguments made from either side. Comments such as "he is nuts" or "he is the greatest thing since sliced bread" don't really help as they don't actually SHOW one way or the other.
Especially interested in those that actually read his books and what your take on them might be.
Thank you!
edit on 20-11-2012 by firefly9000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by karam
Look i believe in reptillians but david icke is just making millions even my have made billion on this topic in his whole life time and gained so much attention yet he has not caught a reptillian or gave any scientific proof,he just talks without proof for making money don't believe the # world leaders can be reptillians i believe in all # but world leaders being reptillian cmon man lol