It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by roadgravel
Someone said it was immoral for a drone to fly there. What about the morality of shooting birds for fun.
edit on 11/20/2012 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Montana
You do realise that the airspace above private property (50-100ft.) is public space? Now what was that you were saying?
Originally posted by macman
They are not breaking any laws yet are harassed by moronic people that cry when they get a reaction from those they are harassing.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by macman
You made the claim. You source that claim. I'm not claiming anything untill you do.
Originally posted by wagnificent
Thus people try to change the law to be in tune with what is right. This is called activism.
These activists think that these animals are being mistreated, which is currently legal, but they obviously think it is not right.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Montana
You do realise that the airspace above private property (50-100ft.) is public space? Now what was that you were saying?
You do realize that bullets travel far higher than 50-100 feet right?
And how does that change anything?
You can try to play devils advocate all day long, but in the end, the SHARK group was looking for trouble. Plain and simple. And kids, tell the nice camera man what we have learned......
"If you go looking for trouble, you will probably find it" (chanted by the whole class)
They were looking to do their documentaries on animal cruelty. If you consider that as "looking for trouble" then fine. They broke no laws anyway.
Your chanting changes nothing btw.