It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
It's really that simple. If you do not agree, what is so hard about just saying that you do not agree, and leaving it at that? Why insult someone for having a difference in belief or opinion than your own? That is childish and vastly immature.
Originally posted by Malynn
reply to post by Harte
Again, I disagree with your absolute assertion that Sitchin was a "fraud" and a "hoax". However, you conveniently didn't respond to my statement that it is in fact a rule here that COURTESY IS MANDATORY. Or did you not wish to include that in your point-by-point rebuttal?
Originally posted by Harte
Are you the arbiter of courtesy?
*snip*
IMO, you dredged that up, along with your "belief" that I'm wrong, because you simply have no actual response whatsoever to my statements (the cold, hard facts) about your hero Sitchin. This is evident even in your claim that "other researchers" have recently been coming to "similar conclusions..." What a line of total hooie that is!
Originally posted by Malynn
Originally posted by Harte
Are you the arbiter of courtesy?
*snip*
IMO, you dredged that up, along with your "belief" that I'm wrong, because you simply have no actual response whatsoever to my statements (the cold, hard facts) about your hero Sitchin. This is evident even in your claim that "other researchers" have recently been coming to "similar conclusions..." What a line of total hooie that is!
My "hero" Sitchin. lol You don't know anything about me, so perhaps conjecture isn't wise. And you know what they say about opinions being similar to. Of course I'm not the arbiter of courtesy. So you feel it's not discourteous to treat adults like retards because they don't agree with you? Furthermore, you are not the arbiter of truth. I've been around here for awhile, as have you based upon your join date. Also, people like you (especially in regard to this subject) are completely unwilling to speculate on the plausibility of theories that our mainstream science does not accept.
Originally posted by Malynn
You don't know anything about me, so perhaps conjecture isn't wise.
Originally posted by Malynn
I learned many years ago that the subjective appearance of "winning" an argument on ATS amounts to a hill of beans.