Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I have provided a great deal of evidence about contrails in the form of scientific papers and rational reason.
Ditto for me on chemtrails.
And then you say.....
I have used the same scientific papers that you have in order to give a rational argument for chemtrails.
Scientific papers about contrails do not provide any ration argument for chemtrails - your perversion of them is just disinfo.
But with you, that's not really the point.
Oh - well thank yuo for telling me what my point is...
The point is that chemtrail/contrail: both are toxic to us and to the environment. You marginalize jet emissions in order to be
Where did I ever marginalise jet emissions?
Jet pollution exists WHETHER YOU CAN SEE A CONTRAIL OR NOT.
The link between fake cirrus and drought is self-evident.
US drought worsens after weeks of improvement (Nov. 22,
The report showed that 60.1 percent of the lower 48 states were in some form of drought as of Tuesday, up from 58.8 percent the previous week. The
amount of land in extreme or exceptional drought — the two worst classifications — increased from 18.3 percent to 19.04 percent.
Not a single mention of cloud in the article - no link identified there at all - as with all you so-called "rational arguments for chemtrails" it
completely lacks any connection whatsoever.
I didn't ask you to install flight radar - I asked you to establish a link between DOD and Flightradar to support your (at least
implied) claim that such a link existed.
Are you seriously trying to tell me that DOD is not interested in the public's interest in flight paths?
I am asking you for evidence to support your claim that there is such an interest.
Are you seriously telling me you have no evidence and have dreamed this up from your own imagination?
Some of the things you say just aren't very real.
Really? so me requesting you supply some evidence to support your claim is "not real"?
Look at all the hoopla to just get on a plane. Look at all the mistakes i.e. babies that are on some terror watch list. Those are the
glitches in the data mart info showing up. If you can't be real about the sky and what is actually visible there, at least be realistic about the
path that electronic surveillance has taken. Read the links I provided earlier. Profiling is an old old science. It was done in WWII on Hitler in
order to find predictability and weakness. Profiling is a scary science; scary in the sense that it is unerringly accurate. When used to indicate
the persons not in a sonambalistic state but still questioning and objecting, it becomes very big brotherish.
So you are saying that because the allies in WW2 "Eavesdropped on Hitler" therefore the DOD is checking flightradar? Or it occurs because there are
body searches for passengers boarding a/c?? Or because there is phone tapping? That is your "rational argument"?
So I guess....yes - you are telling us you have dreamed this up from your own imagination!
Yet again you show the bankruptcy of the "chemtrail" myth - you cannot come up with a single piece of evidence to support your scaremongering at
all - even when you do provide a link....there is no actual link to your claim (that "the link between fake cirrus and drought is self evident")
BTW of course "fake cirrus" is also not chemtrails is it - it is water - ice crystals....so you manage to debunk your own disinfo!!