It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When did I ever say that it should be up to me or the government to decide how much someone gets to have?
Originally posted by ldyserenity
As long as we don't have to hear the right pissing and moaning about how their guy was so much better and magically would have waved a wand and changed everything and we'd all be dancing around the campfire singing Kumbaya and having unicorn stew and skittles for desert....oh wait that's what this thread is all about? You don't say! Well...then I guess that is what the next four years are going to be like.edit on 21-11-2012 by ldyserenity because: space screw up
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Anundeniabletruth
When did I ever say that it should be up to me or the government to decide how much someone gets to have?
But your entire post was full of comments llike how no one needed millions of dollars to live. And who said that in the first place? But I've heard this argument before from people who are in the "make the rich pay their fair share". That is nothing but the same old Marxist Socialist rhetoric of taking from the rich to give to the poor.
And what business is it of yours how much a wealthy person has? Do you want everyone to be equally miserable? Or just equal regardless of their abilities or work ethic?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by ldyserenity
As long as we don't have to hear the right pissing and moaning about how their guy was so much better and magically would have waved a wand and changed everything and we'd all be dancing around the campfire singing Kumbaya and having unicorn stew and skittles for desert....oh wait that's what this thread is all about? You don't say! Well...then I guess that is what the next four years are going to be like.edit on 21-11-2012 by ldyserenity because: space screw up
How's that Kumbaya on the Left these days? Oh wait, the Obama magic is now that the economy is better off than it was and he just needs another 4 years to turn things around, and it will be booming again, just as soon as he raises taxes and makes the rich pay their fair share. And all the green energy is going to take off like a rocket and we won't need that awful dirty coal anymore.edit on 21-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Anundeniabletruth
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
I'm confused here...
1) How are "christian schools" any different? They have their own form of "brainwashing."
But I am in full support of people being able to choose what kind of school to go to as long as they're actually going.
my response: My discussion of brainwashing is mainly about Humanist philosophers pushing secularism and values clarification is part of that.
Here is an interesting snapshot of education in America in 1774
Even in Williamsburg, Pennsylvania in 1774, there were still few schools. So, many parents taught their children to read and write at home using a bible and a hornbook. A hornbook was a wooden board with a handle. A lesson sheet of the ABCs in small and capital letters, some series of syllables and often, the Lord's Prayer, was attached to the board and was protected by a thin layer of cow's horn. Some hornbooks of wealthy families were very fancy, decorated with jewels and leather and included ivory pointers. Most of them were plain and had a string around the handle to be worn around the neck.
library.thinkquest.org...
2) You're not saying to do away with education... but you're saying private school.
Poor people can't afford to go to private schools so how exactly would the poor afford to go to school? Especially those with parents who would not want to pay for the kids to go to school in the first place if they wouldn't be sent to jail for the children not going. Tour a trailer park in the south, I dare ya.
my response: I support the idea of vouchers so parents can send their kids to school and not have to pay taxes on public school too. That is fair isn't it? Why the attacks on homeschooling from the NEA and Dept of Education? Answer-because they want to form the thinking of the masses of children into that which supports their Statist ideology. I already posted that.
Why should I tour a trailer park? I already addressed the fact that the system is set up that people cannot afford to send their kids to private schools.
How to make schooling better for poor kids? First get rid of the teachers Unions and make them step up to the demands of better education. Second, throwing more money at education is not going to change anything when the curriculum has been changed from real real reading, writing, and arithmetic to all these social engineering classes, and I hate to bring a hot button issue in here, but the agenda to teach kids about being gay has no place whatever in our schools and it is things like this which have degraded education and why johnny can't read. I was listening to Glenn Beck yesterday and he was talking about these online course materials but the parents are not allowed to see them. I was driving so I couldn't focus entirely on the show, but he did mention something about courses for teaching kids about islam. So, we are now spending taxpayer dollars on teaching kids the culture of Islam but not teaching them how to spell and have good grammar.
If you think I am making this up, I would just like to point out that the Look-See system itself was devised for deaf mutes and then it was decided to use this for everybody, and phonics went out the door.
The Montessori Method uses the phonics method of teaching reading.
What would your ideals of some possible solutions for education for poor kids be?
Please understand that I am not trying to argue because I too am unhappy with the way our current education system is and I would like to hear what others think we could do about it rather than just that none of us like the system the way it currently is.
See my response above
3 ) So you're saying that the story of John Brown was made up to mislead the youth?
They didn't even teach us anything about the guy in school... I never once heard that name in a school. Much like everything else that I ever really learned, I read about that in a library book. You see, I read a lot of library books growing up because my family was very poor, I didn't really have very much to do unless I wanted to go out and get into trouble like most of the other kids in my neighborhood.
WHY do you people prefer to fight and argue over working together to get things done?
Ahhh so the agenda is out. What the hell should abortion have to do with government at all?
Please don't come to me with that whole " well people should know better than to be having sex in the first place" nonsense
China's one child policy was established by Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in 1979 to limit communist China's population growth. Although designated a "temporary measure," it continues a quarter-century after its establishment. The policy limits couples to one child. Fines, pressures to abort a pregnancy, and even forced sterilization accompanied second or subsequent pregnancies.
How does it hurt them to put something back into the system if it isn't going to hurt them any?