It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DelMarvel
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
So, my premise was that donating to La raza and all their social responsibility stuff didn't make them a financially feasible operation.: (no reason given)
Coffee retailer Starbucks continued its recent flurry of business activity yesterday with its first closure of a Canadian store, in Richmond, B.C. The retailer said its Richmond location is the first of 100 non-U.S. stores that will close during 2009, and that 800 additional stores will close in the U.S. this year. According to Metro Vancouver, Starbucks officials said in an email the decision to close stores is “extremely difficult”
Lest CEO Schultz become too preoccupied with building more stores in China and finding new non-coffee products for Starbucks to sell in grocery stores, he might want to lead by first remembering his own observation when the company too big for its britches. "Growth and success cover up a lot of mistakes for a while and produce a mentality that at times can mask truth," he had said (Ostdick, Success, p. 48). Ostdick points out that "Schultz surmised that he couldn't truly transform the company unless it returned its focus to the cup of coffee."
But he said the company would plan its China growth carefully. "Over time there will be thousands of stores in China," said Mr. Schultz. "But it's a complicated market that requires significant discipline and thoughtfulness."
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by neo96
Neo, you know I respect and like you as a person - so please take this as constructive....
We have a lot of work to do in this nation to get ourselves out of a hole that is 30 years, or more, deep. Do you want to be part of the solution? Are you willing to to compromise and do what's best for all - even if that means having to accept some things that don't exactly match up with your personal views?
Or are you going to just stay bitter and see it all crash and burn, just so you can say "I told you so?"
I'm willing to find the middle ground to do what's best for everyone, the wealthy and corporations included. Are you willing to include the disenfranchised and poor in your vision of a perfect America?
This game is no longer about who wins - it's getting to a point where we all win or we all lose.
~Heff
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by sageofmonticello
Well yes, really it was only referring to people of voting age.
Originally posted by FirstCasualty
For Canada the next 4 years are going to be awesome. Actually it will be awesome for the entire British empire. The US is in for a massive correction. the last 4 years were just meant to make you used to the idea. Nobody wants the US to go into shock, just back to farming potato and corn for the British.
Originally posted by Hefficide
From my point of view we've had 32 years of Reaganomics to ensnare us and only 4 years of a cycle to try and change those policies.
Originally posted by mishmallow8
reply to post by neo96
Abraham Lincoln on the Civil War:
"This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. Though there were great differences of opinion between the South and the North, on the question of slavery, neither Jeff Davis nor any one of the leading men of the Confederacy would have dared to attack the North, had they not relied on the promises of the Jesuits, that under the mask of Democracy, the money and the arms of the Roman Catholic, even the arms of France, were at their disposal, if they would attack us. I pity the priests, the bishops and the monks of Rome in the United States, when the people realize that they are, in great part, responsible for the tears and the blood shed in this war; the later the more terrible will the retribution be.
Just thought I'd point that out. The vatican is the great harlot. The beast with many nations.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by neo96
4 more Years of Liberal stupidity.
Sorry Liberals.
Originally posted by Riposte
Originally posted by Hefficide
From my point of view we've had 32 years of Reaganomics to ensnare us and only 4 years of a cycle to try and change those policies.
Oh please. Give me a f-ing break and quit spewing these ridiculous talking points from the Obama administration.
There has been NO ATTEMPT WHATSOEVER to try and change the policies of the last 30-40 years, NONE. Debt fueled "growth" has not only not changed, it has increased exponentially. Do you understand what is going on here? There has been no true economic growth for 30+ years. All of the fake "growth" is a result of a greater increase in debt.
Just get off the internet if you can't understand basic math.
Originally posted by Riposte
Oh please. Give me a f-ing break and quit spewing these ridiculous talking points from the Obama administration.
Originally posted by Riposte
There has been NO ATTEMPT WHATSOEVER to try and change the policies of the last 30-40 years, NONE. Debt fueled "growth" has not only not changed, it has increased exponentially. Do you understand what is going on here? There has been no true economic growth for 30+ years. All of the fake "growth" is a result of a greater increase in debt.
Originally posted by Riposte
Just get off the internet if you can't understand basic math.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by Riposte
Originally posted by Riposte
Oh please. Give me a f-ing break and quit spewing these ridiculous talking points from the Obama administration.
I'll begin with a simple and pleasant reminder that civility is mandatory on ATS and that censor evasion is not in line with the posting guidelines you agreed to when signing up for our beloved site.
Now...
My opinions are my own. They are not talking points nor regurgitation from any source other than my own mind. As for your insistence that I quit voicing my thoughts and opinions? My answer is simply "No."
Originally posted by Riposte
There has been NO ATTEMPT WHATSOEVER to try and change the policies of the last 30-40 years, NONE. Debt fueled "growth" has not only not changed, it has increased exponentially. Do you understand what is going on here? There has been no true economic growth for 30+ years. All of the fake "growth" is a result of a greater increase in debt.
You do realize that the budget was balanced at the end of the Clinton administration - a fact that tends to unravel your entire rant - and makes it seem like nothing more than a "talking point"? There has been tremendous growth in not just the American economy, but in the economies of many other nations as well during the past 30-40 years. Sure, aspects of that growth are spurious and manipulated. But those aberrations do not alter the larger truths involved.
Originally posted by Riposte
Just get off the internet if you can't understand basic math.
Again, I am afraid you are in store for a disappointment as my reply is still "No". As for a grasp of basic math - maybe a grasp of more advanced concepts is needed to see the truth of things. There is nothing basic about global economics.
~Heff