It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The White House has released its plan explaining how the sequester’s mandatory spending cuts to defense and domestic spending will be implemented in 2013. Here’s the background on what the sequester is, how it happened and what happens from here:..................
The sequester, explained
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
reply to post by beezzer
The "fiscal cliff" is obviously a media engineered term developed to incite fear and boost ratings. Really, the repercussions aren't THAT dramatic, and the policy from it would bring us way closer to a balanced budget than anything else DC would come up with.
The problem would be that unemployment could go up a point, we could slide into recession, and we might end up seeing all gains on the deficit erased by some high spending job creation bill in the summer.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Must include a tax increase on the "rich".
Originally posted by beezzer
I know this won't be popular, but I was watching Stossel this weekend, and he gave a no-nonsense look at what would happen after the fiscal cliff.
Level-headed economists agreed that it wouldn't be the end of the world.
Now I hate the idea of raising taxes, period! But if we can make huge spending cuts, then so be it.
Lets not just cut the yearly "increases" to government agencies and entitlement programs, but make real, actual cuts.
Taxes? We'll deal with (one thing at a time)
When the economy tanks further due to tax increases that'll be the mandate to lower them again.
Anyhow, just my take on it.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by xuenchen
Must include a tax increase on the "rich".
Include the Poor also, and Middle Class too, right?
Originally posted by Thepump
Poor rich people
So sad for them getting 10 years of benefit
What will the world do now
You can even make the argument that the earned income tax credit subsidizes industries that pay low wages. A recent report from the National Employment Law Project (link opens PDF file) named the 50 largest low-wage employers, and among the top five were retailers Wal-Mart (NYS: WMT) , Target (NYS: TGT) , and Sears Holdings (NAS: SHLD) . Restaurant stocks also made a big showing, with Yum! Brands (NYS: YUM) coming in at No. 2 and McDonald's (NYS: MCD) close on its heels at No. 3. Without the earned income tax credit, low-wage earners might not be able to make a living in these jobs, leaving employers either without an adequate supply of labor or having to increase compensation.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Thepump
Really?
Why is Obama,Pelosi, and the rest of the democrats fighting to keep the Bush tax cuts on the middle class in place eh?
Tax cuts only benefited the rich, and all that garbage.
Quite the lies and the hypocrisy
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Thepump
Neither are those 47 million on welfare nor that 50 million on SS or that same 50 million on medicare, or that 50 million on medicare.
So have a point?
Last time I heard Americans are "thin challenged" according to Mrs. O and Bloomberg.