posted on Nov, 19 2012 @ 08:16 AM
At one hour and seven, the presenter (who allegedly knows something about aviation) clearly sounds exasperated after another of the 'atomic bomb
carrying submarine launched Hiryu
' rants.....I strongly suspect that he knows exactly what I have pointed out above, ie:
1 - The I-400 class submarine did not carry the Hiryu
it carried the Seiran
2 - 1940s atomic bombs were BIG.....Neither of these aircraft could have carried one.
3 - The Japanese did have a program for an aircraft big enough for the job, the Nakajima G5N Shinzan
, but they didn't get to put it into
production before they were (without a shadow of doubt) thoroughly nuked themselves:
I didn't need to look any of this up, just find the links on Wiki, but I make no claims to be an 'expert on aviation'.....Given the extravagant claims
this guy is making, I'd expect significant details to the plot like these to be depicted accurately before I'd give the story any credence
Need I go on?
edit on 19-11-2012 by squarehead666 because: s&p