Possible I guess, but I really doubt it would happen. Saying that though, I may end up eating my hat. It would certainly make things "interesting".

He's a master politicial mediator and he genuinely gives a hoot. While I think Carter would have been better, he is more world renowned.

Hey I would love to see him in the UN, I think he will do a great job and he is also very good speaker and charismatic.

This could quite possibly be the start of the New World Order, in keeping with the theme at ATS. Eh, I guess time will tell....

Originally posted by marg6043
Hey I would love to see him in the UN, I think he will do a great job and he is also very good speaker and charismatic.

What marg said.

He's a consummate diplomat, and would be great in the UN.

Originally posted by Bout Time
He's a master politicial mediator and he genuinely gives a hoot. While I think Carter would have been better, he is more world renowned.

You have got to be kidding....the best president in our lifetime? .......

That idiot did more to destabilize the US in general than any other US president ever did....well unless Kerry was president...in comparison Kerry would probably make Clinton look like Mother Theresa...

Oh and btw...yeah he would fit right in with the UN proposal to disarm the US....he tried to do it when he was in office....while he was arming and selling/allowing to steal military technology from the US to the Chinese and other communists countries.....

Hey Trick...I totally agree with you...this would trully be the EVIL NWO everyone keeps talking about if Clinton is ever head of the UN.... and with Hillary as possible presidential US candidate in 2008...


[edit on 21-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Bout Time - unfortunately, Carter will be 82 by the time Kofi Annan steps down.

And this is all hoping the United States allow the UN to survive. I'm starting to feel that at the very least, a Bush II presidency would probably take the US out of the UN - perhaps even call for its dismantling.

But that's a topic for another thread.

Originally posted by Muaddib

Originally posted by Bout Time
He's a master politicial mediator and he genuinely gives a hoot. While I think Carter would have been better, he is more world renowned.

You have got to be kidding....the best president in our lifetime? .......

That idiot did more to destabilize the US in general than any other US president ever did....well unless Kerry was president...in comparison Kerry would probably make Clinton look like Mother Theresa...

Oh and btw...yeah he would fit right in with the UN proposal to disarm the US....he tried to do it when he was in office....while he was arming and selling/allowing to steal military technology from the US to the Chinese and other communists countries.....

Hey Trick...I totally agree with you...this would trully be the EVIL NWO everyone keeps talking about if Clinton is ever head of the UN.... and with Hillary as possible presidential US candidate in 2008...


[edit on 21-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Give me a break, Clinton did the most destablizing of America than any other president, thats bull#. Just take a look at our current president, hes lead us into a war on false premises, and since hes become President he pushed our allies away, and now the world is more anti-American. I think Clinton would do a great job as UN-General, hes help with the 3rd world countries before, hes a great man. I hope Kerry is elected this time, so he can bring back our allies.

Three yrs ago I was told that Clinton would seek the position of Sec. Gen. of the UN.
HE WILL GET IT ! The big winner will be the IMF & World Bank.
If ANYONE thinks the UN is an organization without evil intent, they need to do some
serious research.

Originally posted by CMCLA2003
...............
Just take a look at our current president, hes lead us into a war on false premises, and since hes become President he pushed our allies away, and now the world is more anti-American.
..................

The false premises you are talking about came from the whole world's intelligence.... They were saying wmd existed before the war in Iraq, just read the 1999 UNSCOM report....... it wasn't just Bush, and for your information Clinton was saying the same thing as Bush did......

Clinton went as far as to attack Iraq in which hundreds of people died in a mosque as a supposedly milk factory was bombed under Clinton's watch...some other places in Iraq were bombed under the command of Clinton... Clinton also called for a coalition, yes it was formed under Clinton's watch, and he said that more force would be used if necessary to disarm Saddam and Iraq.....and so did say Kerry....

When Bush said in the second debate that Saddam would still be in power if Kerry was president Kerry said and I quote: "not necessarily".....

The only way that Saddam wouldn't be in power is if he was ousted like the coalition did....

The whole world was saying there was evidence that wmd were unnacounted for in Iraq, meaning that Iraq still had....

The only difference is that countries like Russia, France, China, Germany and some others just wanted more sanctions on Iraq so they could pocket more money in programs like the oild-for-food scandal...while 500,000 Iraqi children died once more...

[edit on 22-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Yep, he probably saw some ugly intern on the UN bench and wanted to start an international relationship with her.

Originally posted by Muaddib

Originally posted by Bout Time
He's a master politicial mediator and he genuinely gives a hoot. While I think Carter would have been better, he is more world renowned.

You have got to be kidding....the best president in our lifetime? .......

That idiot did more to destabilize the US in general than any other US president ever did....well unless Kerry was president...in comparison Kerry would probably make Clinton look like Mother Theresa...

And you are how old? Has the puberty fairy visited you yet? I really do try to respect everyone's opinions, but the empty rhetoric and false allegations that are the mainstay of your posts beg for some sort of age verfication system prior to a post being posted. Do yourself a favor and pick a Right Wing mentor from the moderator list, look at their arguments which have had the due diligence of vetting Freeper propaganda prior to them registering them, and take their cue.

And on that note. Please keep the personal attacks out of the thread Period. This is an ATSNN discussion not a mud pit one.

Thanks
FredT

Originally posted by Bout Time
He's a master politicial mediator and he genuinely gives a hoot. While I think Carter would have been better, he is more world renowned.

Your talking about Reagan? Then you and I are in agreement. But Clinton, the Best president ever?. Pardon me a moment while I do the heimlich manuver on myself..... Oh much better now. Clinton led with his groin, managed to leave GWB with a burst bubble of an economy. Had the oppurtunity to get Bin laden (In all fairness though, no one could have predicted the scope of 911) embarked on cozying up to the Chinese, negotiated a deal with the NK that gee isint working........ and on and on and on and on. May have had Vince Foster and Ron Brown "taken care of" etc etc.

No Clinton as U.N. Sec General? What a joke. Jimmy Carter maybe. he was a crappy president as well, but does have good respect world wide. His downfall would be his age. But then again Kurt Waldheim was older too.