Islam and Fluoride., page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 17-11-2012 @ 06:55 PM by boncho



After coming across an article today I uncovered a groundbreaking link between Islam and Fluoride. (Oh dear!). Yep, it seems the good Prophet (Peace be upon him) was utilizing the same tactics as those evil NWOers that have been trying to kill you all off while simultaneously turning you into mindless drones with low sperm counts.

Alternatively, one might consider this a pretty cool, natural way of cleaning one's teeth (But I posted it in skunk works for artistic freedom):


Miswak



The miswak (miswaak, siwak, sewak, السواك) is a teeth cleaning twig made from a twig of the Salvadora persica tree (known as arak in Arabic). A traditional alternative to the modern toothbrush, it has a long, well-documented history and is reputed for its medicinal benefits.[1] It also features prominently in Islamic hygienical jurisprudence.


en.wikipedia.org...

The Miswak twig is a popular tool for cleaning teeth (and other oral hygiene) used in the Arab world since before the times of Muhammed (Peace be upon him), although he did make it quite popular encouraging people to use it many times throughout the day. It's use is also reenforced in the hadiths (apparently).

Salvadora Persica is in fact a small tree or shrub with a crooked trunk, seldom more than one foot in diameter, bark scabrous and cracked, whitish with pendulous extremities. The root bark is light brown and the inner surfaces are white, odour like cress and taste is warm and pungent. Chemically the air dried stem bark os S. Persica is extracted with 80% alcohol and then extracted with ether and run through exhaustive chemical procedures. This showed that it is composed of:

1. Trim ethyl amine

2. An alkaloid which may be salvadorine

3. Chlorides

4. High amounts of fluoride and silica

5. Sulphur

6. Vitamin C

7. Small amounts of Tannins, saponins, flavonoids & sterols



Source

A bunch of useful chemical can be found inside the curious twig, one of course, being fluoride.

Study on fluoride levels found in the Miswak

The highest F concentration at the approximal area was obtained after using the miswak impregnated in 3% NaF for 3 days compared with the other products (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). To conclude, NaF-impregnated miswaks produced a rapid release of F in vitro as well as in vivo and may be an interesting vehicle for home care use for caries prevention in countries where they are used regularly.



reply posted on 17-11-2012 @ 07:02 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by boncho



There's a huge difference between natural flurodies and synthetic ones.

The synthetic forms of fluoride like those found in toothpaste and in our water are very dangerous for you, as the research has shown.

Small doses of natural fluoride, even daily have not been shown to cause any significant effects on the human body.

~Tenth


reply posted on 17-11-2012 @ 07:33 PM by Egyptia
reply to post by boncho



Brilliant!!! I wish we had this growing in North America. It is thoroughly disgusting to me that denstists are taught to promote such a destructive poison. What is more disconcerting is that none of them challenges the use of flouride. People are truly lead to the slaughter like unsuspecting lambs.


reply posted on 17-11-2012 @ 07:33 PM by pirhanna
reply to post by boncho



Yes, because everyone knows how docile Americans are... *sarcasm intended*
Isn't that the primary claim of anti-fluoride folks?




edit on 17-11-2012 by pirhanna because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-11-2012 @ 07:50 PM by Egyptia
reply to post by pirhanna




A good read on flouride and studies done.

cof-cof.ca... rnal-Fluoridation-Fluoride-19-Sep-2012.pdf

www.fluoridealert.org...

www.kipnews.org...


reply posted on 18-11-2012 @ 07:08 AM by boncho
reply to post by phroziac

The scary thing is fluorosilicic acid was never tested. All safety testing for "fluoride" as a water additive was on laboratory grade sodium fluoride.





Not true, they have been studied.

I often find myself defending certain arguments against fluoride on the forum because of how much bad information is put out against it. (Although I personally don't agree with the practice).

-Conundrum!-

I don't mind the negatives being pointed out about something but it has to be done in a way that doesn't jeopardize the argument.

Here's an interesting one that is anti-fluoride...

Silicofluorides and lead uptake:

1.

2.

3.

The massachusetts called for more science on the topic and the Elsevier linked paper did so...

The Elsevier study concluded:

These findings show that fluoride consistently increases BPb and calcified tissues Pb concentrations in animals exposed to low levels of lead and suggest that a biological effect not yet recognized may underlie the epidemiological association between increased BPb lead levels in children living in water-fluoridated communities.



reply posted on 18-11-2012 @ 07:56 AM by Lil Drummerboy
reply to post by boncho

Boncho
It is rather ignorant to attempt to compare this with what the ADA has been pushing here in the states, Do more research into what Sodium fluoride does to the body and mind before making this look harmless.

Yes fluoride is in many things naturally, this has been established over and over on this site and many others. So for further interest to yourself,, read all info prior to making a comparison. thank you.

Nitrates occur naturally in celery and ive got no problem eating them, but when chemists make it Sodium Nitrate and add it to meats as a preservative, it then becomes cancerous..


reply posted on 20-11-2012 @ 12:37 AM by NJoyZ
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to
post by boncho



There's a huge difference between natural flurodies and synthetic ones.

The synthetic forms of fluoride like those found in toothpaste and in our water are very dangerous for you, as the research has shown.

Small doses of natural fluoride, even daily have not been shown to cause any significant effects on the human body.

~Tenth


I'd just like to add to this that it is also the 13th more common element, and highly attracted to bonding with any calcium it can find. While in most cases naturally it is harmless, commercialy maybe harmful, and either way,.. it can be a bone leach.


reply posted on 22-11-2012 @ 09:40 AM by phroziac
reply to post by boncho




Got a link to anything about testing of fluorosilicic acid? I'd like to see it. Anything I have found was testing on sodium fluoride, but any water treatment plant ive ever been to used fluorosilicic acid. Does seem like a bit of a conspiracy in that regard. But I don't like giving out wrong info, of course.

By the way, last time I was at a water treatment plant, the guy that set me up to unload my tanker, was telling me that he doesn't wear a chem suit when he deals with fluoride and that he has got it on his skin and didn't do anything to him. WHAT? I sure thought that'd be a big deal. Of course i'm not trained with that crap.

Oh, and the phosphates I deliver to water treatment plants are a bit of a conspiracy as well. But I always get on the subject of fluoride when I am making these deliveries. I've been to a couple of plants that don't use fluoride at all.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



New Crop Circle Hackpen Hill Cube
  Posted 16 days ago with 92 member flags
Get ready to find yourself in a whirlwind of other worldly activity
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags
Crop Circles Explained - Hidden Messages From Aliens & ET\'s ?
  Posted 13 days ago with 24 member flags
Man Made Ancient Pyramids Found on Antarctica???
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
The Flat Earth theory, With Interviews from believers
  Posted 1 days ago with 22 member flags
James Cameron the revealer & programmer?
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
Secrets Revealed 2
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Mars: The Old Earth?
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags