It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowcast
Originally posted by EmperorXyn
reply to post by Shadowcast
Dam man, I totally missed that. There's nothing wrong with the intention of killing thousands of people.?? LOL
Intention is one thing capability is another. Hamas is throwing unguided medium range missiles at iron dome. Israel is f16 carpet bombing cities, firing live tank artillery into cities and has 75,000 soldiers on standby.
If someone shoots me with a nerf gun my first reaction isn't to shoot back with a .45.
Despite the fact that the Gaza Strip is controlled by Hamas, an organization that has fired at least 10,000 rockets at Israel and has declared its intention to eliminate the Jewish State, Israel facilitates the entry of necessary goods into the Gaza Strip for the benefit of the civilian population.
At the Security Cabinet meeting on 17 June 2010, the Government outlined its new policy towards the Gaza Strip. It was agreed to:
Liberalize the system by which civilian goods enter Gaza.
Expand the inflow of materials for civilian projects that are under international supervision.
Continue existing security procedures to prevent the inflow of weapons and war materiel
According to the new policy, whatever is NOT on the restricted list will be allowed into the Gaza Strip. The only goods that are currently restricted are arms, weapons and various war materiel, and certain items that have military as well as civilian applications. Because of the problematic nature of these dual-use materials, construction materials are currently allowed in only for PA-approved projects that are under the supervision of international bodies.
Originally posted by hounddoghowlie
well you can say what you want about anonymous.you can say that there is no way to track or find them, if memory serves there have been members caught through out euorpe, and the U.S.. Just google it, here i did for you.
anon members caught
anon members better tuck tail and dig a deep hole, cause once mossad gets after them they will hunt them till the end of time and they will dog them till their dieing day. just ask any ex nazi war criminal.
and mossad doesn't play..
Originally posted by foodstamp
Originally posted by DPrice
reply to post by dakota1s2
Is that why they repeatedly bomb Gaza and steal land steadily over decades?
You read what he said. His stance is the same mumbo jumbo that is mainstream belief. The Jews are entitled to that land regardless of who has occupied it for years. They must all leave and let the Jews back into there rightfull home. So these palestinians are the "squatters"
whatta a load of crap.
I'm an American because I live here. Not because the bible said so. If the Bible said the Chinese were entitled to a land where i live and my forefathers lived. I would defend it too. The palestinians are getting a raw deal on this one. And have been for sometime.
It's REALLY so awesome you come down and spend the time to educate us...
You got NO case brother!
If those evil Jews have been 'stealing' land from those poor innocent Muslims who have obviously been there for since the Cenzoic era (65 million years )...
How come their country is so damn tiny?
(Didn't know I was fluent in Clown did ya?)
Originally posted by pacifier2012
If anon take down sites critical to pin-point accurate targetting then Anon might be contributing the more civilians deaths?
Do they want that on their heads? I'm sure th haven't thought about that. Clever computer dudes but clever isn't bright!
Groups, as such, are abstracts of the mind, and can have no morals of their own. When your target is above what the cattle consider to be "law", then it is necessary to responsibly answer to higher law.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Here's the thing, though: Anonymous has taken up the mantle of a vigilante organization. When that happens, the inevitable questions are -
Does this group think it's above the law?
The question you want to ask is, "Do the participants in this group share morals that I (not we, unless you refer to the Royal We) feel comfortable with?" You might think that this is a trifling difference, but I assure you, imprecision in speech reflects imprecision in thought, and a man who cannot think precisely cannot discern truth from fiction.
Does this group have morals we feel comfortable with?
see above. Also, how much enslavement are YOU prepared to endure before you draw the line?
Where does this group draw the line?
"It?" The individuals participating will do all they see fit and necessary, with perhaps some prankish shenanigans thrown in. Do you expect less, or more?
Can we count on it to do what's right, even when it wants to do otherwise?
The participants, whether legit or false flag operatives, are only doing as the script dictates. The result is the only result that there can be: reintegration. Do you fear it?
How do we know this group is legitimate, and not a cover?
When did the participants pledge themselves to work for the people? All I have seen, heard, and read indicates ad-hoc strikes against extreme (perceived) injustices. They all work for God, ultimately, just as you do, in spite of your querulous fidgeting.
How do we know this group won't eventually work for itself, rather than the people?
Only if he can cook a good frittata.
Vigilante groups scare me. They can be useful, but they're also unstable. Do you want a rabid dog to guard your family?