Cancer and Chemotherapies that kill you.

Greetings,
If Rife technology was not banned by the AMA, drug companies, and our government, there would be no need for this post.
Edgar Casey stated that about a half dozen kernels of almonds a day would prevent cancer. Almonds contain a cyanide that is the basis for Laetrile that was banned by the dug cos and our government.
If a substance or procedural prevents the predatory capitalists from making money, then it shall be banned.
Here's another you all might want to check out.

rexresarch.com
Go to what 's neuvo
Scroll to article on boron and arthritis.
Boron, also helps to prevent cancer.

reply to post by GeorgeH


Bitter almonds yes,

regular almonds no.

They cut down the bitter almond trees. See my post at the end of page 2. ATS All in the book, world without cancer.

Originally posted by Northwarden
reply to post by NavyDoc

 

None of what you said was true. "bIlderburgers? Chair of lucifer?" These are not scientific principles and must be rejected by thinking people out of hand.

You mean to say unthinking people? That would be the truth of it. We know what's behind the movements of the UN, Codex Alimentarius, the council's of the unspoken who rule their corporations. You may have a very stitched-up, strait lace way of looking at things, but by bordering too much on pc publicized opinion to debate from, you "throw out the window" that which most of us have concluded here : that people who study satanism control much of the valid, material, next-door and down-the-block companies that create the backdrop of our universe. If you don't see this fact, and acknowedge this fact as truth and therefore discussion-worthy, where should I begin to explain how that eventually filters down to the patient, under the university-educated doctor?

Trust me, I've done much, much more reaserch, using objective science than you have obviously.

You crow loudly at me, but under-estimate what the abilities of research can incorporate above your head and out of your means to define. I've read about many a crumpled man, who later realizes his future was upended when he realized the depravity he supports was never worth his devotion. You will support your family, and friends, and every stranger under the hypocratic oath, under what - the hope - that those cash driven companies aren't creating massive side-effects to their tumours? You hope the FDA is properly regulating everything you have been proscribing to your patients?

And you have blind hope that this fool on the internet has been telling you the truth too,eh? At least we have repeatable, peer and third party review and basic science.

No, we nen of science use evidence, and the most updated evidence at that. Your snake oil salesmen provides not a single shred of data real data, just 30 year old snippits, but just sad and unverifieable sotries. Anecdote does not equal data but it is good at conning people out of their cash.

Originally posted by GeorgeH
Greetings,
If Rife technology was not banned by the AMA, drug companies, and our government, there would be no need for this post.
Edgar Casey stated that about a half dozen kernels of almonds a day would prevent cancer. Almonds contain a cyanide that is the basis for Laetrile that was banned by the dug cos and our government.
If a substance or procedural prevents the predatory capitalists from making money, then it shall be banned.
Here's another you all might want to check out.

rexresarch.com
Go to what 's neuvo
Scroll to article on boron and arthritis.
Boron, also helps to prevent cancer.

That's just silly. THe AMA bans nothing, it does not have any control, and most physicians are not any members. THey do lobby and this is why I'm not a mamber. Conspiracy? c'mon conspiracy 'cmon.

You talk about doctors being predatory capitalists, but that is exactly what these snake oil salesman are. No proof, no testing, just a bunch of sad stories and people by it. I thought that laetrile nonsense was over in teh early eighties after it killed Steve McQueen.

Here is a good read on the laetrile scam:Laetrile removes your money, not your cancer

Now they are calling it B-17 because of previous negative connotations. It's not a vitamin, much less a B-vitamin so that is yet another example of the dishonesty of these hucksters.

A long dissertation about the fraud of laetrile:
The Rise and Fall of Laetrile

reply to post by NavyDoc


Doc,

Did you read the book?

V/r,
ETC

Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by NavyDoc

 

Doc,

Did you read the book?

V/r,
ETC

Yep and both the sites I posted ubove have excellent rebuttles.

Greetings,

OK, you can fight over laetrile, but, you can't deny the success of the Rife Technology.

I've been using it for about six years and I wouldn't be writing this if it wasn't for the Rife tech.

And the results I've personally seen with others is amazing.

reply to post by GeorgeH


No reason to fight.

Doc can take the chemo,

I can take my apricot seed stuff...

Originally posted by GeorgeH
Greetings,

OK, you can fight over laetrile, but, you can't deny the success of the Rife Technology.

I've been using it for about six years and I wouldn't be writing this if it wasn't for the Rife tech.

And the results I've personally seen with others is amazing.

This rife?

Interest in Rife was revived in the 1980s by author Barry Lynes, who wrote a book about Rife entitled "The Cancer Cure That Worked". The book claimed that Rife's 'beam ray' device could cure cancer, but that all mention of his discoveries was suppressed in the 1930s by a wide-ranging conspiracy headed by the American Medical Association. The American Cancer Society described Lynes' claims as implausible, noting that the book was written "in a style typical of conspiratorial theorists" and defied any independent verification.[5]

In response to this renewed interest, devices bearing Rife's name began to be produced and marketed in the 1980s. Such 'Rife devices' have figured prominently in a number of cases of health fraud in the U.S., typically centered around the uselessness of the devices and the grandiose claims with which they are marketed. In a 1996 case, the marketers of a 'Rife device' claiming to cure numerous diseases including cancer and AIDS were convicted of felony health fraud.[14] The sentencing judge described them as "target[ing] the most vulnerable people, including those suffering from terminal disease" and providing false hope.[15] In 2002 John Bryon Krueger, who operated the Royal Rife Research Society, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for his role in a murder and also received a concurrent 30-month sentence for illegally selling Rife devices. In 2009 a U.S. court convicted James Folsom of 26 felony counts for sale of the Rife devices sold as 'NatureTronics', 'AstroPulse', 'BioSolutions', 'Energy Wellness', and 'Global Wellness'. [16]

Several deaths have resulted from the use of Rife machines in place of standard medical treatment. In one case, a U.S. court found that the marketer of a Rife device had violated the law and that, as a result of her actions, a cancer patient had ceased chemotherapy and died.[17] In Australia, the use of Rife machines has been blamed for the deaths of cancer patients who might have been cured with conventional therapy.[8]

In 1994, the American Cancer Society reported that Rife machines were being sold in a "pyramid-like, multilevel marketing scheme". A key component in the marketing of Rife devices has been the claim, initially put forward by Rife himself, that the devices were being suppressed by an establishment conspiracy against cancer "cures".[5] Although 'Rife devices' are not registered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and have been linked to deaths among cancer sufferers, the Seattle Times reported that over 300 people attended the 2006 Rife International Health Conference in Seattle, where dozens of unregistered devices were sold.[9]

Oh, dear.

Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by GeorgeH

 

No reason to fight.

Doc can take the chemo,

I can take my apricot seed stuff...

Fair enough. Its your body and you are free to do whatever you want with it.



In the same vein, I have this rock that keeps tigers away. I haven't seen a tiger around here ever so it works great. Wanna buy it?

Well, you know a big point in the book is how big companies were telling us for years how good smoking is for us.

In most things, to find the truth it is only necessary to follow the money.

No money in natural cures, therefore we only approve chemo.

What is written in the book and the old video "world without cancer" rings true to me.

And although the studies were suppressed, there were studies, by reputable people, who were fired after getting answers that big pharma did not like.

I will not worship at the altar of big pharma. Maybe Doc can not help it, they train Docs a certain way, to use approved treatments and do not allow them to develop unique treatments on their own. That is the system. Doc is part of that system. But as a layman, will no ax to grind and an open mind, I believe the apricots are effective and the chemo is poison. This makes sense to me.

Originally posted by NavyDoc

And you have blind hope that this fool on the internet has been telling you the truth too,eh? At least we have repeatable, peer and third party review and basic science.

No, we nen of science use evidence, and the most updated evidence at that. Your snake oil salesmen provides not a single shred of data real data, just 30 year old snippits, but just sad and unverifieable sotries. Anecdote does not equal data but it is good at conning people out of their cash.

Blind fool indeed. He's more qualified than most, and not regulated by the drug industry, and is calling out the corrupt activities he sees around him on a daily basis. That's a far cry from most "aligned" "doctors". But I call those who trust the FDA the foolish ones, who still insist that this globalist entity doesn't have mega-profits as their motivation. Emotional, financial, and physical control over humans is their reward, and it's so inter-mixed with good, decent medical technology that it creates this fantastic illusion of professionalism and superior knowledge. A child could ask "Why is daddy gettin' sicker from all that medicine"?, and be closer to the truth than all these hyper-educated doctors vast repetoire of knowledge put together.

I’m William Campbell Douglass II, M.D. I’ve been called “the conscience of modern medicine.”

But, I’ve also been labeled a “maverick”, and several less flattering names too, by some of the biggest names in the government and health establishments – but, hey, that’s part of the territory. And my territory is everywhere…
•I’ve flown with US Navy crews as a flight surgeon…
•Saved lives as a long-time emergency physician…
•Battled malaria in bullet-torn regions of Central America…
•Fought deadly epidemics at my own health clinic in Africa…
•Worked alongside doctors at Russia’s renowned Pasteur Institute…
•I’ve even been called before Congress (they never asked me back)…

And if there’s one undeniable fact I’ve learned in 40 years of treating patients all over the world, it’s that…

There is no such thing
as an undeniable medical fact!

That’s why I keep searching and fighting for the real medical breakthroughs that will keep you on the road to a healthy, length life – a road that can be easier, cheaper and far more pleasant than any health-nag would ever lead you to believe. I guarantee it.

douglassreport.com...

Your snake oil salesmen provides not a single shred of data real data, just 30 year old snippits, but just sad and unverifieable sotries

Utter bs. You obviously haven't looked into him. He is Very current, usually very accurate (it looks like he corrected that 64 to 79 figure in the later article he presented btw Boncho), and his stories are verifiable : I've found his information fits other sources on a number of occasions. He adds new material daily, and it costs nothing to sign up to his newsletters or to view his archives. The fact that they are sometimes presented "anecdotally" as compared to what, a research paper?, does not immediately disquality the veracity of information. With enough research into te corruption side, you too will see how depraved the system is. It becomes an easy feat for a man with medical degrees, vast medical experience, a team of researchers, and the understanding of FDA - WHO corruption to take an informative, hard-line stance against green-flagged corporate drugs/procedure and to remain integral and relevant. Even if you don't like the sound of findings, you should at least look into someone before critisizing them.

For example, in support of smoking. He doesn't advocate factory cigs, or big tobacco industries (with potential for fiberglass shavings, etc). He supports strong moderation and organic tobacco. Among the benefits of smoking are tar coating on lungs : air particulates, such as plutonium particulates, embed in the tar and can be coughed up and expelled from the body. An arguement for casual smoking? You bet it is. Look back to the sixties when Trinity exploded : 12,000 worldwide nuclear explosions later, and a few nuclear disasters, and you still have the "poster child of cancer", smoking, taking the heat fo the actual cancer causes. Pretty convenient, huh? When the government unrolled the anti-smoking campaigns in the sixties there was a lot of rolled eyes and sealed lips from scientists, and the public laughed about it. Five decades later we have "smoke-free ", and a draconian set of rules to enforce against freedoms. Meantime, every NPP pollutes a thousand km around it with proton radiation, 3 of 50 types of radiation are detected for, and people think it's from smokin. What a joke. It couldn't be the sodium nitrite in processed meat, or the aspertame in drink, it must be somthing else.

I love how those who support the industry are dead-set on chemotherapy as their default choice. I have no problem seeing anyone debunk a scam, or a procedure, but then to default back to chemo as their pre-programmed minds covet th knowledge-base they've accumulated there over actually viable alternatives. With the possible exception of Leukemia, So sad. It's a total brainwash, complete with a complex education. The bigger and shinier they make those machines, the costlier they are, and the longer they glitter in your eyes.

This is on-topic while speaking of cancer in general, and it is the source I wanted to add to back my recent points (I ran out of room in the post above). Highly advised reading in the source compilation btw, it covers many bases.

Well, this is ‘nothing’ compared to what the current 450 NPP (edit: not worldwide figure) secretly keep releasing - just this very moment: Chernobyl released total of 800kg plutonium. Every NPP releases 4x Chernobyl accident EVERY YEAR! (recent AL reveleation )
(snip)

The Hanford list:

Radionuclides Released to the Air from Hanford US-site (1944-1972)
Radionuclide Physical Half-Life in seconds (s), minutes (m), hours (h), days (d) or years (y) HEDR Release Estimate (in curies) (where provided by HEDR)
iodine-131 8.0 d 739,000
ruthenium-103 39.3 d 1,200
ruthenium-106 368.2 d 390
cobalt-60 5.3 y 1
zirconium-95 64.0 d 1,200
iodine-132 2.3 h 3,820
cerium-144 284.3 d 3,770
cesium-137 30.0 y 42
strontium-90 29.1 y 64
yttrium-91 58.5 d -
strontium-89 50.5 d 700
barium-140 12.7 d -
niobium-95 35.2 d -
tellurium-129m 33.6 d -
cerium-141 32.5 d -
plutonium-239 24,065 y 2
xenon-133 5.3 d 418,000
praseodymium-143 13.6 d -
lanthanum-140 40.3 h -
cesium-134 2.1 y -
neodymium-147 11 d -
plutonium-240 6,540 y -
iodine-129 15,700,000 y 46
plutonium-241 14.4 y -
antimony-125 2.8 y -
tellurium-132 78.2 h -
cesium-136 13.1 d -
promethium-148m 41.3 d -
plutonium-238 87.7 y -
promethium-147 2.6 y -
europium-154 8.8 y -
xenon-131 11.9 d -
silver-111 7.5 d -
tin-125 9.6 d -
cadmium-115m 44.6 d -
iron-59 44.5 d -
yttrium-90 64.0 h -
tellurium-125m 58 d -
europium-155 5 y -
niobium-95m 88.6 h -
neptunium-239 2.4 d -
promethium-148 5.4 d -
silver-110m 249.9 d -
krypton-85 10.7 y 18,500,000
uranium-238 4,470,000,000 y
americium-241 432.3 y -
molybdenum-99 66.0 h -
neptunium-237 2,140,000 y -
rubidium-86 18.7 d -
antimony-124 60.2 d -
cobalt-58 70.8 d -
curium-242 162.8 d -
manganese-54 312.5 d -
praseodymium-144 17.3 m -
xenon-133m 2.2 d -
tin-126 10,000 y -
iron-55 2.7 y -
tin-119m 293 d -
uranium-235 703,800,000 y -
technetium-99 213,000 y -
europium-152 13.3 y -
samarium-151 90 y -
rhodium-106 29.9 s -
uranium-236 23,400,00 y -
rhodium-103m 56.1 m -
silver 108m 127 y -
barium-137m 2.6 m -
tellurium-129 69.6 m -
promethium-149 53.1 h -
technetium-99m 6.0 h -
thorium-234 24.1 d -
plutonium-236 2.9 y -
iodine-133 20.8 h -
curium-244 18.1 y -
plutonium-242 376,000 -
cadmium-115 53.5 h -
americium-243 7,380 y -
zinc-65 243.9 d -
cesium-132 6.5 d -
uranium-234 244,500 y -
zirconium-93 1,530,000 y -
samarium-153 46.7 h -
cesium-135 2,300,000 y -
nickel-63 96 y -
chromium-51 27.7 d -
tin-117m 13.6 d -
gadolinium-153 242 d -
tritium (H-3) 12.4 y 200,0003
carbon-14 5,730 y 554
cerium-143 33 h -
curium-243 28.5 y -
tin-121m 55 y -
cadmium-109 464 d -
antimony-122 2.7 d -
indium-115m 4.5 h -
xenon-129m 8.0 d -
niobium-94 20,300 y -
plutonium-237 45.3 d -
holmium-166m 1,230 y -
protactinium-231 32,760 y -
nickel-59 75,000 y -
xenon-127 36.4 d -
thorium-231 25.5 h -
niobium-93m 13.6 y -
gallium-72 14.1 h -
arsenic-77 38.8 h -
thorium-228 1.9 y -
bromine-82 35.3 h -
silver-110 24.6 s -
actinium-227 21.8 y -
curium-245 8,500 y -
samarium-147 106,000,000,000 y -
radon-224 3.7 d -
tin-121 27.1 h -
thulium-170 128.6 d -
thorium-230 77,000 y -
radon-220 55.6 s -
beryllium-10 1,600,000 y -
curium-246 4,730 y -
lead-212 10.6 d -
curium-241 32.8 d -
silver-108 2.4 m -
thorium-229 7,340 y -
zirconium-97 16.9 h -
copper-67 61.9 h -
krypton-81 210,000 y -
bismuth-212 60.6 m -
nickel-66 64.6 h -
arsenic-76 26.3 h -
niobium-97 72.1 m -
thorium-232 14,050,000,000 y -
radon-222 3.8 d -
thallium-208 3.1 m -
niobium-97m 60 s -
praseodymium-142 19.13 h -
radon-225 14.8 d -
indium-115 500,000,000,000,000 y -
barium-135 m 28.7 h -
thulium-171 1.9 y -
iodine-130 12.4 h -
lead-210 22.3 y -
radium-226 1,600 y -
gadolinium-152 108,000,000,000,000 y -
polonium-210 138.4 d -
radium-228 5.8 y -
krypton-79 35 h -
palladium-109 13.4 h -
uranium-240 14.1 h -
bismuth-210 5 d -
scandium-48 43.7 h -
curium-248 339,000 y -
actinium-228 6.1 h -
berkelium-249 320 d -
sodium-24 15 h -
lead-214 26.8 m -
bismuth-214 19.9 m -
xenon-135 9.1 h -
copper-64 12.7 h -
californium-249 350.6 y -
calcium-47 4.5 d -
strontium-91 9.5 h -
yttrium-91m 49.7 m -
magnesium-28 20.9 h -
aluminum-28 2.2 m -
europium-152m 9.3 h -
argon-41 1.83 h 9,000,0005

preparator.wordpress.com...

reply to post by NavyDoc


I almost forgot. As regards to Polio, Smallpox, and other vaccines. They were introduced at the tail-end of the disease cycles, that is, after the diseases were almost eliminated. This gave the impression of being useful, but the disease was already well in remiss : but they wanted to claim that cake for themselves and introduce whatever backdoor effects they sought from the vaccines : autism and sterility for starters. Further,they are ineffective in eliminating the diseases as they claimed. Read ther first page of this thread to uncover that issue.

Vetting of this issue starts about this members' post, down the page. The X

Conclusive Evidence That "ALL" Vaccines Are Very Harmful Even Causing Death
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Doctors ordered to stop giving flu jabs to children
www.abovetopsecret.com...&addstar=1&on=10358801#pid10358801

Italian court officially recognizes vaccines cause autism
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Infant Monkeys Given Doses of Vaccines Develop Autism Symptoms
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Most of your are so far off topic it's not funny. To justify alternative cancer therapies you go into, vaccinations = death, Chernobyl, magical radio waves, and then a peculiar logic which states if some company tried to make money in the past, the ones hawking alternative therapies must be telling the truth...

A good read on laetrile

I think the most ironic thing here, (if you actually decide to read it) is that you find the types of accusations that go out towards the mainstream medical establishment, are in fact mirrored by the proponents of quack substances like "laetrile" and the like.

It is in fact, the snake oil salesmen of these harmful "cures" that are engaging in the behaviour so often associated with the mainstream "suppressive, evil corporations".

I am not saying the medical establishment or pharma in general is void of corruption, fraud or bad practice. What I am saying, is the alternative is rife with it, and don't even offer legitimate science to back their claims, or even try to offer something at least appearing to be legitimate. Their main sales pitch is anecdotes and a play on people's emotions, namely fear.

These people are making a good amount of money off of their snake oil sales, and the thing that gets me, is that if the drugs and substances they claim actually cure cancer, why don't they bankroll their own double blind studies to prove it once and for all? They could, but they don't, cause they are fraudsters after your wallet.

Originally posted by kawika
Well, you know a big point in the book is how big companies were telling us for years how good smoking is for us.

In most things, to find the truth it is only necessary to follow the money.

No money in natural cures, therefore we only approve chemo.

What is written in the book and the old video "world without cancer" rings true to me.

And although the studies were suppressed, there were studies, by reputable people, who were fired after getting answers that big pharma did not like.

I will not worship at the altar of big pharma. Maybe Doc can not help it, they train Docs a certain way, to use approved treatments and do not allow them to develop unique treatments on their own. That is the system. Doc is part of that system. But as a layman, will no ax to grind and an open mind, I believe the apricots are effective and the chemo is poison. This makes sense to me.

By your same logic, then those huckstering the "natural cures" are also in it for the money then? Fraud is quite rife in the "natural cure" types as well.

The answer is science. The cure all types lack it.

reply to post by Northwarden




Where does one start? I've flown with the Navy (not just as a flight surgeon but one of the guys actually at the controls) and I've spend many a year in dealing with death in the ER and on various battlefields throughout the world. Cool. And all of that, although an interesting bit of personal history, has jack and squat to do with how basic science works.

You say his stories are verifiable, but STORIES ARE NOT SCIENCE. One cannot demonstrate proof using anecodes...if fact, anecdotal evidence is directly opposite proof.

And what makes the statements of the idividual even mor laughable is that he touts the health benefits of inhaling smoke into your lungs as long as it is "organic."

People claim that pharma is just money hungry but WIlliam Douglas (Buy my miracle suppliments at $60 bucks a crack." "Buy ram's horn for erectile dysfuntion") is not? Seriouisly? Take goat horn pills to get an erection and you guys think he's not a con man? Seriously?

He's been called "the consience of modern medicine." By whom? Himself that is who.

His website doe snot give any real mention of any data...just teasers to (you guessed it) products of his to buy.

No references to support his data and no proof of his claims that include fibers is useless and that coffee is a miracle drug.

He makes stuff uo like the "secret SV-40 viral bioweapon that became aids" and people buy it because he claims to be a former Naval flight surgeon (no proof on that I'm till looking it up) and people buy it because they do not know that a Naval Flight surgeon is nothing more than a graduated intern who gets a few months extra training to learn how to pass out aspirin to pilots and has about as much access to top secret viral research as my dog. He's never graduated from a residency, never has had training above medical school, has never done research. The guy is a fraud.

reply to post by NavyDoc

You say his stories are verifiable, but STORIES ARE NOT SCIENCE. One cannot demonstrate proof using anecodes...if fact, anecdotal evidence is directly opposite proof.

His stories aren't even verifiable though. I know you are actually addressing the argument here with more relevant logic, but even what this poster is claiming is not even true.

-facepalm-

-B

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by NavyDoc

You say his stories are verifiable, but STORIES ARE NOT SCIENCE. One cannot demonstrate proof using anecodes...if fact, anecdotal evidence is directly opposite proof.

 

His stories aren't even verifiable though. I know you are actually addressing the argument here with more relevant logic, but even what this poster is claiming is not even true.

-facepalm-

-B

Agreed. He Douglass just makes # up that is sufficiently "alterantive" sounding to sell his products but there is not even anything remotely resembling any sort of varifivation.