posted on Nov, 16 2012 @ 05:49 PM
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Actually let me turn the tables here... I accuse you, OP, of being a disinfo agent. You play the part of overly paranoid conspiracy theorist who
constantly types nonsensical crap in all caps and accuse everyone of plotting against you... giving us all a very bad image. Meanwhile you seem to
have all this semi-interesting information on all these elaborate secret projects... seems pretty damn suspicious to me OP.
To what end? Can you construct logic around it? What would I gain exactly?
I HAVE A GOOD FRACKING REASON TO FIGHT OPPRESSION, WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
I have already pointed out someone that is NOT exhibiting agent behavior. These AGENTS ARE TRYING TO HIJACK THIS THREAD, IT IS GETTING TOOO BIG!
Rules of Dis-info:
Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'
Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This
is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling
) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough,
the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts
towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the
direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of
education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger
censorship by a forum moderator.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as
variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy
buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of
gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
What do YOU know about:
OPERATION EARNEST VOICE
NTREPID SOCK PUPPETS
US SPECIAL COMMAND, TAMPA, FL
METAL GEAR - MULTIPLE ONLINE PERSONALITY MANAGMENT SOFTWARE
edit on 16-11-2012 by thatblissguy because: (no reason given)