It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But first I think, I'd like to see what the capacity of any such emmiters acting on created clouds would be. How many of just these ionizing stations are there out there in the world? (known and unkown) Is there a map of where these these things are located.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Tecumte
Got a major red flag still flying because you said:
But first I think, I'd like to see what the capacity of any such emmiters acting on created clouds would be. How many of just these ionizing stations are there out there in the world? (known and unkown) Is there a map of where these these things are located.
It's one thing, talking to my own (tree-huggers) about the dangers of atmospheric experimentation. It's another thing entirely, unwittingly but still treasonously aiding and abetting, in order that an enemy might make use of an extant if ill considered shield for their own purpose.
Originally posted by Tecumte
Well no secret here, I'm in Missouri, USA, and yes these towers multipy like rabbits, I can't believe an area needs so many so close together, I wonder if I took a frequency detector out and checked out the city what types of waves are out there. I've never measured around a cell tower be curious to know what some of them put out.
But I was just thinking the way weather mod is being described now is to first create large reactive clouds using planes and then acting on the clouds by energizing the particles using a whole array of land based exciters...
Ideas?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by Tecumte
Well no secret here, I'm in Missouri, USA, and yes these towers multipy like rabbits, I can't believe an area needs so many so close together, I wonder if I took a frequency detector out and checked out the city what types of waves are out there. I've never measured around a cell tower be curious to know what some of them put out.
As a rule of thumb, about 20W per antenna. You don't need a LOT more, the range isn't farther than line of sight from the antenna's POV. A tower's total output is an aggregate of all the individual antennae.
What you really want is a spectrum analyzer, they're loads of fun. You'd be surprised how many things are transmitting around you every day.
But I was just thinking the way weather mod is being described now is to first create large reactive clouds using planes and then acting on the clouds by energizing the particles using a whole array of land based exciters...
It sounds like you're trying to shoehorn this into a "chemtrail" thing. If ionization causes cloud formation, what better ways of doing that are there?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Tecumte
Ideas?
Under capitalism, we pay for ideas. You're not reassuring; quite the contrary. Now you want me to fight with my own. I've got red, white & blue and stars & stripes in my blood. Always on the lookout for the return of the prodigal son. That includes my government and the military industrial complex. In a republic with a constitution that guarantees God given rights, those that wander are encouraged to return home and welcomed when they get here.
Let me be plain, Jane; ideas on how to use an extant sky grid as a weapon against its' creators is a rather bold request. Smells of disdain and disrespect for your audience.
I can't tell if we're on the same page or not.
Originally posted by Pervius
If it wasn't possible there wouldn't be hundreds of patents on it.
A couple of years ago the Chinese published a scientific article saying they figured out how to use microwaves emitted from a satellite to make clouds dissipate. They only likely found out by intercepting the energy we emitted to make the connection.
Watch the weather radar images for America now. Notice how there are regional circles of rainfall only in certain spots that get kicked on and off when conditions are correct? Keep watching those weather radar images and you'll see the pattern. You can even pinpoint the emitters.
The only downside to their weather modifications is when HAARP and it's little brothers are used to push up on the ionosphere to steer weather fronts. The ionosphere that gets pushed up gets blasted off the planet by the solar wind. Lost forever.
And with all the cuts to the military if HAARP wasn't effective for weather warfare.....it would have never have been put under DOD control. They've been cutting some pretty important things from the military....but NEVER will cut HAARP loose. But HAARP isn't even all there is in our emitter system....just 1 piece of many many other systems.
Start reading about why they wanted to put those tethered satellites in space. The contract to build them was put out by the Air Force in January 2011. They grab energy from the highly charged particles in the radiation belts and dump them on the atmosphere...for weather effects.
Russia also built all the Ionospheric Heater satellites currently over North America SAVING America. Seems the Ionosphere is at a critical low level from all that they've been doing so they are heating the Ionosphere at night to expand it over North America / Europe / Russia to SAVE the white folk from what they've done.
Weather modification has been ongoing for decades in the United States. It was perfected during the Vietnam War leading to the ENMOD Treaty signed by the United States. However, this has not stopped a whole host of weather modification programs and experiments being initiated or are now ongoing in the United States and with increasing frequency in many foreign countries.
The profound impact of these ever-increasing and highly sophisticated weather experiments and programs are radically changing our climate and local weather conditions in many areas. Your local weathermen are not reporting these events leading many to believe that some man-made weather is either extreme or unusual…thus, the public is unaware of many of these programs.
These exponentially growing programs have no government or public oversight, limited oversight in a very few states which allow them, and no government or public oversight or consent for the rest of them. These programs change the climate, the micro-climates needed for watersheds, negatively impact tree health, and agriculture crop production. NOAA lists some of these programs but most are not listed due to their experimental nature, military classification, university experiments, and failures to notify NOAA by various states, counties, cities, weather modification companies, and private individuals and corporations who may all modifying your weather.
Originally posted by madjetxe
Yesturday i decided to whistleblow this and organised a meeting in the church hall and told about 50 people about this. As you may understand, word spread fast.
Originally posted by Tecumte
rezn8d.net...
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Tecumte
rezn8d.net...
And how he got pwned on metabunk, and again, and the trifecta!
Originally posted by Tecumte
I went out this evening, about 5:30 p.m. central, took a stroll around the place, and from the top of my little hill here I could see a massive plane created cloud bank out in the west,