It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
I wonder if you were were ever aware of hte long bread lines in Russia before the fall of the Communist Empire there? It really demonstrated the failure of a centralized control of the means of production, which is one of the major definitions of communism.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by FreebirdGirl
Way to get around the T&C rules.[/quote[
Yes. You wrote this in response to:
Because half of the people hear are so eager to pass their agenda they spit lies without any attempt to research and find the truth.
You are guilty as charged.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I was born there and I was there about the time you are trying to describe here. I call bullcr@p on this, it's my effing domain and you don't know jack compared to me, about that land, its culture and its bread. Desist. By the way you can't make bread comparable to the Russian bread.
Yep, times were tough and all, the economy was never doing too well, and I do indeed hate the Communism. That said, nobody had to worry what' going to happen to their family should they get sick. Again, I never thought this was a viable regime, but when I hear someone badmouthing Russia, they are just stupid POS. I'll type really slow, they are POS.
edit on 17-11-2012 by buddhasystem because: (no reason given)
In the Soviet times there was a great shortage of all consumer products. Clothes or food were no exception. In order to buy some bread people were ready to spend hours and hours queuing up.
1983. A long queue into the footwear store. The length of the line implies that people would expect to buy imported footwear which was of better quality and fashioncompared with the Soviet stuff.
The collapse of the Soviet Union 20 years ago eliminated one of the most defining and despised features of Soviet life: standing in line – lines for bread, butter, and other basic necessities. According to one estimate, citizens in the USSR spent up to a third of every day standing in lines.
In light of Mikoyan’s laundry list of successes in the realm of consumer goods, one might
assume that the standard of living in the Soviet Union was flourishing. Unfortunately, Stalin’s
assurance that “life has become more joyous, comrades” was not completely fulfilled. Consumer
goods steadily increased in price in the second half of the 1930s. The new stores with wellstocked
shelves of dazzling items were out of reach to average Soviets. Moreover, many of the
supposedly luxury items available for purchase mimicked Western senses of fashion and design,
but their quality often left much to be desired. After harvest shortfalls in 1936, bread queues
jammed Soviet sidewalks as conditions forced people to wait through miserable weather and late
nights to acquire basic foodstuffs.296 Rural shops suffered from a severe shortage of consumer
goods. During the harvest crisis of 1936, peasants flocked to cities to acquire bread since no grain
was available in their villages. Between 1937 and 1938, letters poured into Leningrad decrying the
complete absence of other consumer goods such as cloth and clothing. For example, many
government-administered stores in the countryside had only shoes of one size. Consequently,
Moscow and Leningrad became fraught with migrants from the countryside—from as far as
Ukraine and the Caucasus—who were hoping to find the necessities their local outlets lacked.297
Moreover, since shortages had been eliminated in 1935, speculation and hoarding hurt the effective
distribution of foodstuffs and other goods.
Originally posted by mrnotobc
It's funny, here you claim you hate communism, but In almost every post I've seen you make, you sound like you love communisun.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by buddhasystem
Well I do wonder about some things you have said in these threads. The latest being you lived in Russia and you claim there were no bread lines.
Oh please!!!!!
It's laughable you end your diatribe by telling me that I can't make bread as good as Russians. That's really funny.
I did however have a Russian dance instructor. He told me the Russian people still hate Stalin. His eyes got teared up as he said it. He also told me you cannot now make money for yourself in Russia, that it is all run by the mafia.
Under Stalin the government socialized agriculture and created a massive bureaucracy to administer policy. Stalin's campaign of forced collectivization, which began in 1929, confiscated the land, machinery, livestock, and grain stores of the peasantry. By 1937 the government had organized approximately 99 percent of the Soviet countryside into state-run collective farms. Under this grossly inefficient system, agricultural yields declined rather than increased. The situation persisted into the 1980s, when Soviet farmers averaged about 10 percent of the output of their counterparts in the United States.
A number of factors made the Soviet collectivized system inefficient throughout its history. Because farmers were paid the same wages regardless of productivity, there was no incentive to work harder and more efficiently. Administrators who were unaware of the needs and capabilities of the individual farms decided input allocation and output levels, and the high degree of subsidization eliminated incentives to adopt more efficient production methods.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by FreebirdGirl
Way to get around the T&C rules.[/quote[
Yes. You wrote this in response to:
Because half of the people hear are so eager to pass their agenda they spit lies without any attempt to research and find the truth.
You are guilty as charged.
Sorry that was not the issue. Glad you are not a mod.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by FreebirdGirl
Way to get around the T&C rules.
No, i am not guilty in the least. I do a great deal of research. I do not use as a general rule use Huffington Post as sources, except once in a blue moon just to show liberals what they themselves are spewing.
I would add, just because you don't like my opinion doesn't mean I am wrong. I do have some understanding of basic comparisons of different kinds of economic systems, and our economy here in the US is what is referred to as a mixed economy. That is why some liberals get away with saying we are not a socialist country, because technically we do not operate exclusively under a socialist system, but we have elements of socialism mixed in with our Capitalist base, and then there is Keynesian economics, which goes on the basis that if people are not spending money, the economy contracts, so the Fed will expand the economy as it sees fit, and then contracts it if they feel it is expanding too fast.
Now here is some commentary about Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand"
In economics, the invisible hand of the market is a metaphor conceived by Adam Smith to describe the self-regulating behavior of the marketplace.[1] The exact phrase is used just three times in Smith's writings, but has come to capture his important claim that individuals' efforts to maximize their own gains in a free market benefits society, even if the ambitious have no benevolent intentions. Smith came up with the two meanings of the phrase from Richard Cantillon who developed both economic applications in his model of the isolated estate.[2]
The theory of the Invisible Hand states that if each consumer is allowed to choose freely what to buy and each producer is allowed to choose freely what to sell and how to produce it, the market will settle on a product distribution and prices that are beneficial to all the individual members of a community, and hence to the community as a whole. The reason for this is that self-interest drives actors to beneficial behavior in a case of serendipity. Efficient methods of production are adopted to maximize profits. Low prices are charged to maximize revenue through gain in market share by undercutting competitors. Investors invest in those industries most urgently needed to maximize returns, and withdraw capital from those less efficient in creating value. All these effects take place dynamically and automatically.[citation needed
en.wikipedia.org...
So if you really want to suggest that my ideas about a restaurant owner having to come up with a way to stay profitable in a time when the Progressives are expaning bureaucratic control of the economy, I bet I will come out ahead in the discourse, because I HAVE done my homework, and likely you have only listened to Huffpo or some Democrat operative.
I was reading Antony Sutton books on Skull and Bones and The Order years and years ago and knew about Hegelian Dialectic in the 80's. I am conservative but that doesn't mean I let the Bush family off the hook. They are all involved.
I knew about the Tri lateral commission and CFR back then too. I know about the Bilderbergs. These secretive organizations are not just coming from both Republican and Democrat Parties but are also Internationalists and don't care what country they screw up.
if you really want to challenge me to a duel about whether Progressivism and socialism/communism is good for our country, let's have at it. I'm game. Are you? Or are you just going to accuse me of being a liar but word it so the Mods don't smack you down?edit on 17-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jacobe001
So are you all for getting the Banksters and Multi National Corporations out of our government and also to end lobbyists?
Originally posted by jacobe001
They do not exist to help you or this country but only themselves.
Originally posted by jacobe001
The Obama Phone railed on by many is a perfect example where the Telecommunications Industry lobbied to create government money to fund these phones.