The Cow Flatulence Tax, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 10:59 AM by Maxmars
reply to post by soficrow



No matter what course we take, in whatever case; cows will produce methane.

In fact, most any eater of vegetable matter will.... heck... even compost heaps do, and don't even look at the taiga, or the defrosting permafrost bogs...

Rather than address that reality by trying to find out how to minimize the effect... (I don't know, perhaps by letting cattle graze naturally on grass?) the 'solvers of problems' evoke banking and trade schemes which they - in their mighty wisdom - will "manage" for our benefit.

I do not dispute the problem... only that this is a function of our "industrial/commercial" manipulation of nature... so I am reticent to allow them to define the solution.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:00 AM by soficrow
reply to post by projectvxn



All you would do is shoot the price of beef and milk up.


So rather than discouraging unhealthy beef production and over-consumption of (contaminated) dairy products, are you suggesting we encourage "protein production" alternatives? (Apparently factory farmed pigs and maybe chickens also produce copious amounts of methane.)

Seems to be factory farming that's the real culprit here, and the corporate industry business model. Used to be family farms that produced our food; farmers were happy to make a living, and proud to offer their communities good, healthy food. Now, all the family farms have been destroyed - and "food production" is all about the bottom line.


[And don't get me ranting about how factory farms use human antibiotics routinely, thereby create new diseases, and, and, and....]


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:03 AM by butcherguy
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to
post by butcherguy



Are you advocating a sales tax to consumers, NOT a tax on producers?

???


No, I am saying that any tax on producers is paid by the consumer in the end.
That is how it works. The tax may be levied against the producers, but the consumer pays the bill.
edit on 15-11-2012 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:03 AM by soficrow
reply to post by Maxmars



this is a function of our "industrial/commercial" manipulation of nature... so I am reticent to allow them to define the solution.


Agreed - it's the corporate industrialization of food production that's the problem here, and the sheer numbers of cattle required to boost and maintain the bottom line. Time for a new "food business" model methinks.

(See post above.)


edit on 15/11/12 by soficrow because: add url



reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:07 AM by projectvxn
reply to post by soficrow



I don't care about how you feel about factory farms.

I don't care how you feel about beef or other meats.

I don't care what your definition of "over consumption" is.

What I do care about is not going out of our way to make the worlds poor pay more for food they already can't afford or are having a hard time affording. You just want to punish an industry for what you think are bad practices. I want to make sure we're not compounding the price of food between inflation and taxation. A relationship of economic significance that you "lets tax everything under the sun" people never seem to understand.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:07 AM by butcherguy

All that wasted gas, you mean the factory farms have not yet figured out how to put a tube up the cows wazu to get that natural gas?
reply to
post by fnpmitchreturns


I have been working with a number of companies that are capturing some methane, but not from the cattle's bums.
They are installing waste treatment plants at factory farms. Methane captured from the treatment plant's digesters is burned to create energy and take the methane out of the greenhouse gas mix.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:12 AM by kaylaluv
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to
post by Maxmars



this is a function of our "industrial/commercial" manipulation of nature... so I am reticent to allow them to define the solution.


Agreed - it's the corporate industrialization of food production that's the problem here, and the sheer numbers of cattle required to boost and maintain the bottom line. Time for a new "food business" model methinks.

(See post above.)




The other problem is the HUGE increase in meat consumption in modern society. Even countries that traditionally didn't eat a lot of meat (China, Japan, etc.) are now following western societies by increasing their meat consumption. You can't really blame the corporations - they are just filling our demand for more and more and more beef. I say we cut back on meat consumption - that would solve a lot of the problem. Just leave the cattle raising to the family farmers and ranchers - they would raise just enough beef for minimal needs - no excess methane - no taxes necessary.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:12 AM by soficrow
reply to post by projectvxn



...Mom and Pop can't produce enough on their own to feed 300 million Americans and every country that imports our food products.


Hmmm. Fallacy.


The amount of food wasted in the United States is staggering. In 2010, more than 34 million tons of food waste was generated, more than any other material category but paper. Food waste accounted for almost 14 percent of the total municipal solid waste stream, less than three percent of which was recovered and recycled in 2010. The rest —33 million tons— was thrown away, making food waste the single largest component of MSW reaching landfills and incinerators.

Generating food waste has significant economic as well as environmental consequences.



I don't think you can come up with a cogent argument as to why we should deliberately make food more expensive.


Our food does not need to be more expensive. Moreover, we are paying through the nose for industrial food processors to REMOVE the nutrition from raw food, then buy it back in tablets - and meanwhile, pay exorbitant prices for "food" that's upwards of 80% powdered cellulose,...

Really stupid imho.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:17 AM by soficrow
reply to post by kaylaluv



...The other problem is the HUGE increase in meat consumption in modern society. ...You can't really blame the corporations - they are just filling our demand for more and more and more beef.


Ever heard of public relations (PR)? Marketing? Advertising? ...You bet your sweet booty we can blame the corporations. They CREATED the market and industrialized cattle production. All to increase the "profit per unit" by "economy of scale" - and jack the bottom line.


Good post btw - thanks and S&



reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:26 AM by kaylaluv
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to
post by kaylaluv



...The other problem is the HUGE increase in meat consumption in modern society. ...You can't really blame the corporations - they are just filling our demand for more and more and more beef.


Ever heard of public relations (PR)? Marketing? Advertising? ...You bet your sweet booty we can blame the corporations. They CREATED the market and industrialized cattle production. All to increase the "profit per unit" by "economy of scale" - and jack the bottom line.


Good post btw - thanks and S&


I see what you're saying. Then I guess their marketing is working really well - get 'em addicted to beef, then fill that addiction. There was a thread around here recently about the L.A. City Council advocating their citizens go one day a week without meat. You would have thought the council was a bunch of Nazis, judging by the reaction of most posters. People will get the dt's without their daily beef fix.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:27 AM by soficrow
reply to post by projectvxn



What I do care about is not going out of our way to make the worlds poor pay more for food they already can't afford or are having a hard time affording.


Me too.


You just want to punish an industry for what you think are bad practices.


Erm, no. I want us all to look at the alternatives and evaluate our options.


I want to make sure we're not compounding the price of food between inflation and taxation.


Your concerns are based on at least two erroneous assumptions:

1. You seem to think that what's sold as "food" is food. It's not - most nutrition has been removed in processing and what goes on the shelves is upwards of 80% powdered cellulose, plus meat glue and other crap

2. Production costs and food shortages drive up food prices - in fact:


The amount of food wasted in the United States is staggering. In 2010, more than 34 million tons of food waste was generated, more than any other material category but paper. Food waste accounted for almost 14 percent of the total municipal solid waste stream, less than three percent of which was recovered and recycled in 2010. The rest —33 million tons— was thrown away, making food waste the single largest component of MSW reaching landfills and incinerators.

Generating food waste has significant economic as well as environmental consequences.




A relationship of economic significance that you "lets tax everything under the sun" people never seem to understand.


Good lord NO!!! I emphatically do NOT want to "tax everything." I want to dismantle the profit-driven global corporate industrial economic system that's killing the world and everything in it.
edit on 15/11/12 by soficrow because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 11:32 AM by soficrow
reply to post by butcherguy



I like beef.


Me too. I grew up on a beef farm, like I said earlier. But let's be clear -

There's a HUGE difference between my Daddy's beef and the crap you get at the supermarket or fast food joint. Plus the added bonuses - no contamination with antibiotic resistant bacteria, no E. coli contamination, no MRSA... The list goes on.



...Thanks for posting.
edit on 15/11/12 by soficrow because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 01:08 PM by fnpmitchreturns
Originally posted by butcherguy


All that wasted gas, you mean the factory farms have not yet figured out how to put a tube up the cows wazu to get that natural gas?
reply to
post by fnpmitchreturns


I have been working with a number of companies that are capturing some methane, but not from the cattle's bums.
They are installing waste treatment plants at factory farms. Methane captured from the treatment plant's digesters is burned to create energy and take the methane out of the greenhouse gas mix.


I am aware that this is becoming a big new industry. It makes sense to become self sufficient farmer....

"It is like cutting costs at both ends" pun intended! HA HA HA

this shows how inefficient we have become because of cheap energy.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 01:14 PM by butcherguy
reply to post by soficrow



There's a HUGE difference between my Daddy's beef and the crap you get at the supermarket or fast food joint.

100% agreement there!

I grew up eating organic beef and wild things. No GMO. No antibiotics. No crazy pesticides and herbicides. Now they spray the fields with stuff that kills everything but a single species of plant. Scary stuff.


reply posted on 15-11-2012 @ 01:36 PM by soficrow
reply to post by butcherguy


Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by soficrow



There's a HUGE difference between my Daddy's beef and the crap you get at the supermarket or fast food joint.

100% agreement there!

I grew up eating organic beef and wild things. No GMO. No antibiotics. No crazy pesticides and herbicides. Now they spray the fields with stuff that kills everything but a single species of plant. Scary stuff.


Scary indeed! ...Nobody needs beef every day. I'd be happy to get some once a week as long as it tasted good - and was GMO, pesticide, herbicide, GH, and disease free. Which won't happen in factory farms...
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags