It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One teenager made offensive comments about a murdered child on Twitter. Another young man wrote on Facebook that British soldiers should "go to hell." A third posted a picture of a burning paper poppy, symbol of remembrance of war dead.
All were arrested, two convicted, and one jailed — and they're not the only ones. In Britain, hundreds of people are prosecuted each year for posts, tweets, texts and emails deemed menacing, indecent, offensive or obscene, and the number is growing as our online lives expand.
Lawyers say the mounting tally shows the problems of a legal system trying to regulate 21st century communications with 20th century laws. Civil libertarians say it is a threat to free speech in an age when the Internet gives everyone the power to be heard around the world.
I understood what you were trying to convey. I think if the other forms of punishment and/or allegations and records cost too much tax payers time and money, the best punishment would be to block the internet services/website accounts for the responsible medium (FB, Twitter etc) (ofcourse before 3 warnings) for that particular individual for an hour or two to start and to be increasingly prolonged if incidents continue to persist. It can eventually be turned off for days or suspended.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by hp1229
Bit of a difficult one, in that i am all in favour of free speech but against false allegations, etc. I suppose for me, the dividing line would be "is it inciting someone to offend?". So, regarding tasteless remarks, they would be fine legally (but perhaps morally questionnable?). However, if someone is, for example, inciting others to riot or attack then that should be an offence (same as if they were doing it in the street). I haven't explained that so well but hopefully you get my drift?
So you have a 5 year old daughter who's been raped and murdered and some punk posts on her Facebook page "The little slut probably deserved it". All her friends, family, teachers etc can see the comment. The hurt it causes is terrible. Would you want that punk punished? Or would you 'grow a set'? No, you'd want to punch him in the face.
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
We should have the freedom to say whatever we want, however vile, offensive or disgusting... It may make those saying those things horrible individuals but it shouldn't be a criminal offense.
Until those saying those things actually physically act and commit a crime, those who are ""offended"" should grow a set.
I could take offense to anything... think about that... ANYTHING... I complain to the police and they (in this country anyway) are obliged to take action. You could find yourself with a criminal record because I made a complaint against you, not because you committed a crime. That's scary stuff.
No, you'd punch me in the face.
No, you'd punch me in the face.