Out of curiosity, how many who support the death ray theory have actually studied any part of the physics involved?
AFAIK, the only way to practically get the kind of energy needed to instantly vaporize a large structure is through an xray laser pumped by a fusion
There was a lot of work done in this field through the Lawrence Livermore lab in the 80's while exploring the actual feasibility of then President
Reagan's Star Wars missile shield. The idea was researched before the moratorium on nuclear weapons testing was passed and while much of the work is
still classified enough was released to the public domain to confirm that while the idea was possible in theory the physical engineering constraints
made it unfeasible.
Contemporary beam weapons such as Boeing's now cancelled YAL-1 chemical laser platform or the U.S. Navy/Northrop Grumman solid state laser program
are measured in megawatts yet are only capable of burning a hole the size of a grapefruit through an aluminum missile body.
What is being proposed, the instantaneous vaporization of a large mass by a directed energy weapon is just not currently possible without a nuclear
weapon being detonated as a power source and nuclear detonations cannot be hidden.
Nicola Tesla was a smart guy who had some good idea's and was completely wrong about others. His work is freely accessible and it is clear that his
teleforce generator particle beam weapon was one of the things he was completely wrong about.
You can read all about it in his own words here...
THE NEW ART of PROJECTING CONCENTRATED NON-DISPERSIVE ENERGY THROUGH
Regarding the nonsense that the collapse of either of the towers was due to anything beyond structural failure, prove it with the math.
The NTSB reports are very thorough and supply all of the information needed to follow their conclusions.
has gone so far as to provide detailed calculations which provide a
comprehensive analysis of the collapse mechanism, I have yet to see anyone who supports the 9/11 conspiracy theory sink their teeth into his findings
to prove his findings wrong.
I have gone through his math, here on ATS, and his progressive collapse analysis works without the need for make believe nano thermite or mystery
directed energy weapons.
Take a look yourselves...
Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building
Dr. Bažant's credentials...
Bažant, who is generally regarded as the world leader in research on scaling in the mechanics of solids, has published over 450 refereed journal
articles and is the author of six books. He is an ISI highly cited researcher in Engineering, which places him among the 250 most cited authors in all
engineering fields worldwide.
He was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 1996, the National Academy of Sciences in 2002, Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences in 2008, and is a registered Structural Engineer in the state of Illinois. He has supervised 60 PhDs in addition to receiving six honorary
doctorates of his own (ČVUT 1991, TU Karlsruhe 1997, CU Boulder 2000, Politecnico di Milano 2001, INSA Lyon 2004, and TU Vienna 2005
A quarter million pound airplane crashed into each tower going 400 mph. The already compromised structural support was further weakened by the heat of
the jet fuel, the remaining steel began to sag and gravity did the rest.
No conspiracy required.