It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wutz4tom
reply to post by Arken
30 years is an awfully long time to sit on such an important microbial find ......Who the heck decides how far apart the steps need to be ??
Nice Find
tomedit on 15-11-2012 by wutz4tom because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Quadrivium
I am pretty sure they are talking about micobial life. Don't get your hopes set on any kind of "intelligent" life.
But hey, microbial life is a good start S&F, good find.
Quadedit on 15-11-2012 by Quadrivium because: S&F
Step by step, Quad.
Step............. by..............step............
Thx
Originally posted by zilebeliveunknown
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Arken
Third, he is talking about microbial life only, not what you think he means.
Do you understand the significance of microbial life on other planets or are you expecting them to find cyborgs?
What science consider as life have more widely meaning than what you're assuming.
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Quadrivium
I am pretty sure they are talking about micobial life. Don't get your hopes set on any kind of "intelligent" life.
But hey, microbial life is a good start S&F, good find.
Quadedit on 15-11-2012 by Quadrivium because: S&F
Step by step, Quad.
Step............. by..............step............
Thx
False. Dont think you know what I assume. People on this forum think NASA know about alien forests and highly evolved animals. When they hear life on mars they think OMG that really was a squirrel in that picture!!! Maybe you missed where Arken talked about NASA coming closer to "disclosure". What science considers life does not have a wider meaning than what I assume, sorry. In conclusion, life has not been found, this is evidence that dates back to 1979, not anything new, and there is no "disclosure".
[...] we have shown that the active LR signal
is periodic, exhibiting a circadian (more appropriately
circasolar) rhythm with a period of 24.66 hr, approximating
the rotational period of Mars. The periodicity in the LR
experiments rapidly evolves over time, and can be almost
entirely extinguished by heat treatment or long-term soil
sample storage. Circadian rhythms are robust biosignatures,
and the presence of such rhythms in the LR signal is at least
consistent with a biological interpretation.
In the current work we have demonstrated that the LR
signal (and the associated noise) in active LR experiments
is very different from the LR signal for heated or long-termstored
soil samples. Furthermore, the active LR experiment
data cluster with known biological signals (rat temperature
series, the active terrestrial LR pilot study Biol 5), exhibiting
flicker (pink) noise in the detrended active samples , whereas
the LR control studies cluster with non-biological signals
such as random background radiation, Mars atmospheric
temperature, Mars lander temperature, and a terrestrial LR
sterile control (Biol 6), approximating white noise.[...]
There's no need for a step by step revelation about bugs on mars.
Originally posted by MysterX
Yes this information is in the public domain, and yes it has been debated here on ATS, and yes people claim it's a non-event because NASA say it's a non-event, while others including individuals who were part of Viking at the time, claim NASA had and is continuing to deliberately hide the discovery that the Viking lander discovered evidence of microbial life on Mars.
The significance of any life on Mars, whether humble bacterial life or not, is astounding on many levels.
Not least of which, is the reasonable conclusion that if microbial life is present on Solar planetary bodies as close as right next to Earth, on our literal doorstep..then the implications for the possibility of more advanced forms of life on Mars or indeed elsewhere is greatly enhanced.
It certainly indicates that life can and probably does take hold wherever it can, and means that like our own world, teaming with unimaginabley diverse and numerous lifeforms, this life in all it's diversity is probably flourishing in many other places, and at all levels of complexity and development.
The knock on ramifications of this, for our antiquated and dogmatic systems of belief and politics, are profound.
That's a powerful reason to deny evidence of any life detected, even microbial life on Mars.
Originally posted by wutz4tom
30 years is an awfully long time to sit on such an important microbial find ......Who the heck decides how far apart the steps need to be ??
Originally posted by MysterX
Not least of which, is the reasonable conclusion that if microbial life is present on Solar planetary bodies as close as right next to Earth, on our literal doorstep..then the implications for the possibility of more advanced forms of life on Mars or indeed elsewhere is greatly enhanced.
Originally posted by IntoxicatingMadness
reply to post by openeyeswideshut
I'd be amazed if it's dying. It's more likely birthing. The sun is slowly getting warmer so it'd slowly warm Mars. It' may have only recently hit the minimum warmth. But of course i'm not exactly an expert.
The results were publish at the time, most scientists thought that they were inconclusive.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Well the general consensus among scientists seems to be that Mars once had lots of flowing water and a stable atmosphere like Earth. The chances are very high Mars once supported life, but the chances are only so high because Mars is so close to Earth. Even if we do prove life once existed on Mars, that life will have more than likely originated from Earth... Mars was probably seeded with microbial life from Earth when a large meteor impacted Earth and sent debris flying off into space (or perhaps it happened the other way around). The chances of life independently manifesting on two planets so close to each other, is virtually zero.edit on 15/11/2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Arken
IMPORTANT: Here the proof of the existence of microbial life in Martian soil.
The entire Pdf. document
Excerpt
[...] we have shown that the active LR signal
is periodic, exhibiting a circadian (more appropriately
circasolar) rhythm with a period of 24.66 hr, approximating
the rotational period of Mars. The periodicity in the LR
experiments rapidly evolves over time, and can be almost
entirely extinguished by heat treatment or long-term soil
sample storage. Circadian rhythms are robust biosignatures,
and the presence of such rhythms in the LR signal is at least
consistent with a biological interpretation.
In the current work we have demonstrated that the LR
signal (and the associated noise) in active LR experiments
is very different from the LR signal for heated or long-termstored
soil samples. Furthermore, the active LR experiment
data cluster with known biological signals (rat temperature
series, the active terrestrial LR pilot study Biol 5), exhibiting
flicker (pink) noise in the detrended active samples , whereas
the LR control studies cluster with non-biological signals
such as random background radiation, Mars atmospheric
temperature, Mars lander temperature, and a terrestrial LR
sterile control (Biol 6), approximating white noise.[...]
..........
Many scientists now accept the notion that ancient meteorites and comets helped jumpstart life on our planet by bringing a significant amount of water, organic molecules and even amino acids to early Earth.
Scientists now think those imprisoned organic molecules were likely created in the massive dust and gas clouds that eventually coalesced into planets and stars, comets and meteorites. Dust clouds are thought to form when events such as novas and supernovas caused chemical elements and molecules created during thermonuclear reactions inside stars to be ejected into space.
.........