It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Former CIA Director David Petraeus has agreed to testify about the Libya terror attack before the House and Senate intelligence committees, Fox News has learned.
Read more: www.foxnews.com...
(Thats why I am curious, if the Media is pro-government and work for TPTB, then why do they criticize the government and not let this slide?? LOL)
Critics have stated that Fox News Channel promotes conservative political positions[5] and biased reporting.[6] Commentators, news anchors, and reporters at Fox News Channel have responded that news reporting and political commentary operate independently of each other, and have denied any bias in news reporting.[7]
Originally posted by MDDoxs
Though I am not sure if you could provide proof that one media outlet was predominately republican or democratic, I always thought CNN was for the democrats and Fox was for the Republicans
Originally posted by Ben81
Fox news is your source ??
its worst then having Debka has a source
Former CIA Director David Petraeus has agreed to testify at a closed-door session of Congress to answer questions about September's terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya, but he will likely also be asked about new revelations that his alleged mistress Paula Broadwell is suspected of storing classified military material, at her home.
Petraeus had been reluctant to testify following his resignation as CIA chief, but pressure had been growing in Congress for him to appear.
"Gen. Petreaus is willing to come before the committee and the details are being worked out," Sen. Diane Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said today. No date for his testimony has been set.
Originally posted by MDDoxs
reply to post by CALGARIAN
(Thats why I am curious, if the Media is pro-government and work for TPTB, then why do they criticize the government and not let this slide?? LOL)
Though I am not sure if you could provide proof that one media outlet was predominately republican or democratic, I always thought CNN was for the democrats and Fox was for the Republicans.
edit on 14-11-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Originally posted by MDDoxs
Though I am not sure if you could provide proof that one media outlet was predominately republican or democratic, I always thought CNN was for the democrats and Fox was for the Republicans
More-or-less, you're right
reply to post by jibeho
Gimme a break. Fox News or not. This is confirmed however his testimony will be given behind closed doors..
Since its a closed door, I just hope the General doesn't hit on any of the female investigators (if any)
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by jibeho
Bah, more transparency...... I hate this testifying behind closed doors crap the last few administrations are pulling....
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by Ben81
Fox news is your source ??
its worst then having Debka has a source
Just google 'Petraeus will testify before Congress on Benghazi attacks' Several outlets for this news...if you hate Fox News or Debka
its against the WH, Pentagone, Congress rules
Originally posted by Ben81
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by Ben81
Fox news is your source ??
its worst then having Debka has a source
Just google 'Petraeus will testify before Congress on Benghazi attacks' Several outlets for this news...if you hate Fox News or Debka
mm then its real breaking news if this is true
sorry this thread is the first time i hear about this
didnt know Generals could testify after their resignations
its against the WH, Pentagone, Congress rules .. why would they then change the rules
especially after being involved in a big scandal about his "affair"
looking forward to hear what he have to say about Benghazi !
Originally posted by hp1229
Since its a closed door, I just hope the General doesn't hit on any of the female investigators (if any)
well..did you hear about the FBI agent who was investigating the affair decided to send a shirtless pic of his to one of the woman involved? From the amount of emails/phonecalls and/or secret rendezvous, who knows...the guy might have a sex addiction problem Similar to many celebrities who often retort to this excuse to getaway from such incidents and seek a counselling to reduce the sentencing Oh well...lets see. Thus far it has been interesting November 2012 after the election.
Originally posted by Sissel
Originally posted by hp1229
Since its a closed door, I just hope the General doesn't hit on any of the female investigators (if any)
Meh, I think he's learned his lesson on that one.
The guy deserves to be in the hot seat. He better invest in some flame retardant pants!edit on 14-11-2012 by Sissel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by jibeho
Bah, more transparency...... I don't like this testifying behind closed doors crap the last few administrations are pulling at all....edit on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:17:07 -0600 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Ben81
its against the WH, Pentagone, Congress rules
This is news to me.
The Congress has subpoena power, and can call anyone they like to testify, I believe.