It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by logical7
So what mode was he in when he died? Man or god?
464 - The unique and altogether singular event of the Incarnation of the Son of God does not mean that Jesus Christ is part God and part man, nor does it imply that he is the result of a confused mixture of the divine and the human. He became truly man while remaining truly God. Jesus Christ is true God and true man.
470 - Because "human nature was assumed, not absorbed",97 in the mysterious union of the Incarnation, the Church was led over the course of centuries to confess the full reality of Christ's human soul, with its operations of intellect and will, and of his human body. In parallel fashion, she had to recall on each occasion that Christ's human nature belongs, as his own, to the divine person of the Son of God, who assumed it. Everything that Christ is and does in this nature derives from "one of the Trinity". The Son of God therefore communicates to his humanity his own personal mode of existence in the Trinity. In his soul as in his body, Christ thus expresses humanly the divine ways of the Trinity:9.
472 - This human soul that the Son of God assumed is endowed with a true human knowledge. As such, this knowledge could not in itself be unlimited: it was exercised in the historical conditions of his existence in space and time. This is why the Son of God could, when he became man, "increase in wisdom and in stature, and in favor with God and man",101 and would even have to inquire for himself about what one in the human condition can learn only from experience.102 This corresponded to the reality of his voluntary emptying of himself, taking "the form of a slave".103
473 But at the same time, this truly human knowledge of God's Son expressed the divine life of his person.104 "The human nature of God's Son, not by itself but by its union with the Word, knew and showed forth in itself everything that pertains to God."105 Such is first of all the case with the intimate and immediate knowledge that the Son of God made man has of his Father.106 The Son in his human knowledge also showed the divine penetration he had into the secret thoughts of human hearts.107
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Akragon
There is nothing from his mouth that says he is "Fully God"...
John 14:8 Philip says - 'Lord, show us the Father" and Jesus says (14:9) “Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father." That's Jesus talking.
Anyways .. the point is that the vast majority of Christians believe Jesus is God incarnate (right or wrong). Therefore, they wouldn't go and follow some Muslim 'Mahdi' fella. Who would follow a mere human when you can follow God Himself instead? That's the point. That .. and this 'Mahdi' fella (who I dont believe actually will ever exist) sounds exactly like the ANTICHRIST in Christian prophecy.
Originally posted by logical7
from what text are you quoting??
And no, he cant be man and god at same time,
You are calling Jesus pbuh a hypocrite!! dont do that.
Originally posted by Akragon
But let me ask... Isn't a mans son the image of his Father?
IF he was God... Wouldn't he say I do the work.... Not my Father does the work?
Scripture says that Jesus is truly man.
Scripture says that Jesus is truly God
incarnate.
IF scripture is correct .. then Jesus is
both man and God incarnate.
The Incarnation is a fundamental theological teaching of orthodox (Nicene) Christianity, based on its understanding of the New Testament. The Incarnation represents the belief that Jesus, who is the non-created second hypostasis of the triune God, took on a human body and nature and became both man and God. In the Bible its clearest teaching is in John 1:14: "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us."[1]
In the Incarnation, as traditionally defined by those Churches that adhere to the Council of Chalcedon, the divine nature of the Son was united but not mixed with human nature[2] in one divine Person, Jesus Christ, who was both "truly God and truly man". The Incarnation is commemorated and celebrated each year at Christmas, and also reference can be made to the Feast of the Annunciation; "different aspects of the mystery of the Incarnation" are celebrated at Christmas and the Annunciation.[3]
This is central to the traditional faith held by most Christians
The mainstream Christian belief is that Jesus is the Son of God, fully divine and fully human and the savior of humanity. Because of this, Christians commonly refer to Jesus as Christ or Messiah.[4] Jesus' ministry, sacrificial death, and subsequent resurrection are often referred to as the Gospel, meaning "Good News" (from the Greek: εὐαγγέλιον euangélion). In short, the Gospel is news of God the Father's eternal victory over evil,[5] and the promise of salvation and eternal life for all people, through divine grace.[6]
Worldwide, the three largest groups of Christianity are the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and the various denominations of Protestantism. The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox patriarchates split from one another in the East–West Schism of 1054 AD, and Protestantism came into existence during the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century, splitting from the Roman Catholic Church.[7]
Originally posted by logical7
or scripture is confused and doesnt make sense, so someone must have made up something and added it making the scripture the way it is.
So on the topic, before following god incarnate one should check if its just an asumption.
Akragon .. I"m enjoying this discussion with you.
I get where you are going with that. I really do. But it seems that when Jesus said 'don't you know who I am? if you have seen me then you have seen the Father' .. it seems deeper than just an image of someone else. At least .. that's the feel I get from it.
IMHO .... Jesus was giving all Glory to God The Father .. as we all are supposed to.
At any rate, Akragon, do we agree that Christians would NOT follow some Muslim dude (Mahdi) .. especially when that Muslim dude fits the bill for the prophesied ANTICHRIST??? Seriously .. reading what this Mahdi is supposed to do if he ever shows up (and I highly doubt he'll ever show up) .. sounds exactly like the Christian version of Anti-christ. (IMHO)
I don't really understand why a
"christian" would follow a muslim in
any case...
The premise in the OP seems to be
comming from a bargining position...
Almost as if the OP was asking Christians to follow another set of
scripture simply because he agrees
with theirs...
Perhaps im missing the logic
.... or the Qu'ran and ISLAM are
confused and don't make sense. So
someone must have made up
something and added it making the
Qu'ran and the Islamic writings about
a 'Mahdi'.
will you(in general) follow/support mahdi if he is standing up for the right things?
Or he would be labelled as AC just because he is muslim
Either way, IF Jesus did return... Its
very likely he won't be recognised by
Christians or muslims... They expect
him to return and wage war...
Which in itself is very unlike Jesus... so
who knows...
Originally posted by logical7
reply to post by Akragon
Either way, IF Jesus did return... Its
very likely he won't be recognised by
Christians or muslims... They expect
him to return and wage war...
Which in itself is very unlike Jesus... so
who knows...
you judge a person by about 3 years of teaching? He may play a very different role in the 2nd coming. Prophet Muhammad pbuh spread the message peacefully for 13years, him and the followers suffered even died without fighting, after Hijrah that changed.
War should never be encouraged but even Jesus pbuh would have to take arms because sometimes keeping quiet any longer would be cowardice.
your reply that you know very little about Islam and Muhammad is a bit shocking to me but more so is your dismissal about it.
Your beliefs are a hybrid of religions but you would be surprised that they match with islamic beliefs a lot too.
You must have your reasons to disregard a major religion but i must say its not the way of someone open to new knowledge.
About Love and war, dint Jesus pbuh him said he came not with peace but with a sword to turn family/relatives against each other.
Why you think jews were disappointed with him when he refused to rebel by saying them to keep paying taxes.
They assumed him to be the one prophecised just mistook it as it would be in 2nd coming.
By my saying that you judge him, i meant how you make up his whole personality by an account of 3 years.
And you assume it to be a spiritual coming. Many people have many assumptions, dont want to offend you, but ya after living in the modern age, a man descending from heaven is very hard to accept.
But then if you do assume that then the AC for you would be what?
I disregard all religion... as it is mearly
a tool for the religious authorities to
maintain control over its people...
Own the monopoly on a persons
beliefs and you also own that person...
Yes... but that is a very misused and
misunderstood passage...
the zealot jews who wanted to fight romans wanted to make him their leader and approached him to ask about taxes but then he gave his famous answer.
Actually... they didn't assume he was
the one prophecied about... they
denied he was the one...
and as far as i seem to recall... they're
still waiting on their messiah...
your thinking turns into a stand here not open to talk.
Its all thats needed to know his ways...
Thats why the gospels are special...
You won't offend me...
We live in an age of deception... and if
people saw anyone "ascending" from
the clouds they would automatically
follow whoever it was...
I would however, assume it was a deception.... perhaps a hologram
designed by the elite... yet another
means of control....
Theres millions of them all around the
world... Know them by their fruits...
without studying it at all? Why you choose to make NT your source? Why not any other texts?
how? Its consistent, when the correction in a previous religion comes from God, not all accept it leading to divide in even families.
the zealot jews who wanted to fight romans wanted to make him their leader and approached him to ask about taxes but then he gave his famous answer.
your thinking turns into a stand here not open to talk.
very likely, but do you think Jesus pbuh literally/bodily cant come?
true, the AC that people assume the only one is the major AC, but there would be many minor ACs coming along before that, and dajjal in arabic means deception or one who decieves.
That might be our issue... I don't
believe the scripture from said
"previous religion" is from God...
I know the story... but i don't see your
point...
I disagree... i am always rational in
these discussions... open to all lines of
thought...