posted on Nov, 14 2012 @ 05:41 AM
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by buddhasystem
Absolutely... If a person wishes to build a home in a zone that is in a flood zone / plain then that person should assume the risk on their own. Even
insurance should not be forced to cover those expenses.
I agree with you 1000%. To be honest, that's an actuarian problem. As you said, flood zone and all, but that needs to be defined since it's a legal
issue, and prominently so.
I still hold that healthcare is different on a few levels. A person who doesn't smoke or engage in a some other risky behavior, can still get sick.
IMHO it's human to stand together in this.