I find this sick and dont like where it is heading (ohio woman/idiot sign), page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:32 PM by mugger
reply to post by lobotomizemecapin



Pretty sad when you are defending a multiple offender who very easily could have killed anyone on the sidewalk, not just kids. If you can't wait for the bus. Pretty simple answer to follow the rules to prevent a tragedy , leave 10 or 15 minutes earlier.
I would have made her wear the sign for a week and revoked her license privileged,along with a hefty fine.


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:44 PM by lobotomizemecapin
Originally posted by jaynkeel
reply to
post by lobotomizemecapin





I saw on another thread that many people thought this was grand but I find it just plain sickening.


So why not add your thoughts and comments to that thread? Why the need to create a new thread? Crap like this in my opinion just clogs this site up anymore, multiple threads covering the same exact topics. End of rant I guess.... But in my opinion she deserves any punishment the judge serves and I think she should have gotten more to be honest. One thing I personally don't tolerate is ignorant people that don't know how to follow the simplest rules of the road.


because this thread is about violating her constitutional rights and not just about what happened.

unlike many of the post where people just post the sames news article I made a topic about an aspect that I felt had deeper problems than what lies on the surface

but yeah keep being a tool and move on


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:47 PM by lobotomizemecapin
reply to post by obnoxiouschick




Humiliation is the abasement of pride, which creates mortification or leads to a state of being humbled or reduced to lowliness or submission. It can be brought about through bullying, intimidation, physical or mental mistreatment or trickery, or by embarrassment if a person is revealed to have committed a socially or legally unacceptable act. Whereas humility can be sought alone as a means to de-emphasise the ego, humiliation must involve other person(s), though not necessarily directly or willingly. Acting to humiliate yourself may be linked to a personal belief (as with mortification of the flesh, with some religions), or it can be part of erotic humiliation where the belittling activity provides emotional and/or sexual arousal or heightened sensation.


Humiliation is currently an active research topic, and is now seen as an important - and complex - core dynamic in human relationships, having implications at intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional and international levels.[1]



You have not made any point that refutes the point I am making. You are offering a perspective that works for your arguement

there was no real point being made so I ignored it


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:50 PM by lobotomizemecapin
Originally posted by mugger
reply to
post by lobotomizemecapin



Pretty sad when you are defending a multiple offender who very easily could have killed anyone on the sidewalk, not just kids. If you can't wait for the bus. Pretty simple answer to follow the rules to prevent a tragedy , leave 10 or 15 minutes earlier.
I would have made her wear the sign for a week and revoked her license privileged,along with a hefty fine.


can you read?

I am not defending her I am appalled at the behavior of the judge

I have stated multiple times that she should be charged in accordance to the law for her crimes. They have set standards in place with what the laws broken should be sentence with.

point blank public humiliation was outlawed by the constitution.


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:58 PM by MeesterB
reply to post by lobotomizemecapin



She didn't just have one bad decision. She had been doing this the whole year, so I don't understand why you feel sorry for her.

I think public humiliation is an effective punishment. The story says she didn't have any remorse in court, so I feel like the smug woman needed to be knocked off her high-horse. You could lock her up or make her pay fines, but that's a waste. I think public service would be a fitting punishment because it could help someone, but this woman got what she deserved imo.


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:04 PM by lobotomizemecapin
Originally posted by MeesterB
reply to
post by lobotomizemecapin



She didn't just have one bad decision. She had been doing this the whole year, so I don't understand why you feel sorry for her.

I think public humiliation is an effective punishment. The story says she didn't have any remorse in court, so I feel like the smug woman needed to be knocked off her high-horse. You could lock her up or make her pay fines, but that's a waste. I think public service would be a fitting punishment because it could help someone, but this woman got what she deserved imo.


Yeah I didnt realize until after that I had misread the article

that isnt my point here though I dont feel sorry for her and dont really care about what she did

What I care about is the fact that public humiliation is considered cruel and unusual punishment and therefore the judge violated her rights.

I feel this is an agenda to deteriorate more of our rights by getting public opinion to back public humiliation and start working away at our right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment


reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:15 PM by MonkeyFishFrog
Originally posted by lobotomizemecapin
Originally posted by quantumgirl11
the police make drunk people clean up their own piss at night in busy town centers - sometimes humiliation is the only thing to make someone realize how idiotic they are. The woman is not being degraded - maybe if she was forced to strip, but she has headphones, a warm jacket and hopefully she is realizing the error of her ways, since multiple parents and court appearances have not.


See that makes sense though because they would have to have a hazmat (SP?) crew come clean up the drunks biohazard which would be expensive.

It is not humiliating in the sense that they put it there they can clean it because they arent going to catch a disease from touching it. And they arent being put on display for millions to see wearing degrading signs

The example is not even in the same ballpark try again


What city do you know where a woman can be seen by millions at one street corner in an hour? You want to get mad at the fact that now "millions" of people have been "forced" to see this woman's humiliation how about going after the ones who published it in the first place? Aren't you just as guilty for doing this because I hadn't even heard about this story until I saw your thread.


Yeah I didnt realize until after that I had misread the article

that isnt my point here though


Funny, almost every other post or response you have relishes in pointing out that poster's inability to read or "lack basic reading comprehension" but how dare members point out your own failures of active reading.
edit on 11/13/2012 by MonkeyFishFrog because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:19 PM by Phage
reply to post by lobotomizemecapin


What I care about is the fact that public humiliation is considered cruel and unusual punishment and therefore the judge violated her rights.

Public humiliation is not prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. It is not mentioned.
cruel and unusual punishment n. governmental penalties against convicted criminal defendants which are barbaric, involve torture and/or shock the public morality. They are specifically prohibited under the Eighth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. However, nowhere are they specifically defined. Tortures like the rack (stretching the body inch by inch) or the thumbscrew, dismemberment, breaking bones, maiming, actions involving deep or long-lasting pain are all banned. But solitary confinement, enforced silence, necessary force to prevent injury to fellow prisoners or guards, psychological humiliation, and bad food are generally allowed. In short, there is a large gray area, in which "cruel and unusual" is definitely subjective based on individual sensitivities and moral outlook.

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...

Nothing barbaric here. No torture. I'm not shocked, nor are many others in this thread.
Humiliation is fair.
edit on 11/13/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:22 PM by lobotomizemecapin
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
Originally posted by lobotomizemecapin
Originally posted by quantumgirl11
the police make drunk people clean up their own piss at night in busy town centers - sometimes humiliation is the only thing to make someone realize how idiotic they are. The woman is not being degraded - maybe if she was forced to strip, but she has headphones, a warm jacket and hopefully she is realizing the error of her ways, since multiple parents and court appearances have not.


See that makes sense though because they would have to have a hazmat (SP?) crew come clean up the drunks biohazard which would be expensive.

It is not humiliating in the sense that they put it there they can clean it because they arent going to catch a disease from touching it. And they arent being put on display for millions to see wearing degrading signs

The example is not even in the same ballpark try again


What city do you know where a woman can be seen by millions at one street corner in an hour? You want to get mad at the fact that now "millions" of people have been "forced" to see this woman's humiliation how about going after the ones who published it in the first place? Aren't you just as guilty for doing this because I hadn't even heard about this story until I saw your thread.


Yeah I didnt realize until after that I had misread the article

that isnt my point here though


Funny, almost every other post or response points out that poster's inability to read or "lack basic reading comprehension" but how dare members point out your own failures of active reading.
edit on 11/13/2012 by MonkeyFishFrog because: (no reason given)


the reason I said millions is because hey millions have seen video of this woman doing just that.

I state that these people lack basic ability to read because they obviously have misread and misinterpreted what I have stated in their rush to be a tool and conform to bashing me for offering an opinion.

oh and the complete inability to distinguish the point I created this discussion about with (and this is beyond me) thinking that I am defending this woman. I am in fact defending the constitution which states that cruel and unusual punishment is illegal in which use of public humiliation was outlawed because it is viewed as cruel an unusual.

tell me how is forcing someone to wear a sign that says idiot not meant to be humiliating? please explain that if you want to be such a smartass
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags