I find it disgusting how weak our leaders are. Our generals can't control their penis, and Obama bows in respect to everyone.

Any man who hasn't contracted enough will power to find loyalty to his wife, is a bald face liar if he says he can be found loyal in the name of state secrets.

If you can't be loyal to someone you love, how are you going to be loyal to a people who would rather spit on you and die than love you back. You can't. Both of these generals are weak, and do not deserve to lead men. They definitely have no business with having state secrets.

This one shows all the earmarks of a veritable #storm.....much like the stupid Clinton affair.
Get readlyalready for the next big American Congressional gossip session......
meanwhile, back at the ranch.........your being bambozzled out of airtime that could be dedicated to the grim reality out there.......

And the OBAMA drama continues, I am not very optimistic about the US future unless you are dependent upon Uncle Obama to provide a meager existence for you. Why work when you can barely survive with the dole outs, that being said, some very strange things are happening and my spidey sense tells me it stinks. Never mind which party you belong or voted for we all are going to experince some kind of trauma.

Originally posted by stirling

meanwhile, back at the ranch.........your being bambozzled out of airtime that could be dedicated to the grim reality out there.......

Obama wants little press as possible today while he's meeting with Labor leaders. Richard Trumpka at the White House......again!

Now Obama has “more flexibility”

I am telling you the guy is a traitor, and our government and military are full of them.

Originally posted by milkyway12
I find it disgusting how weak our leaders are. Our generals can't control their penis, and Obama bows in respect to everyone.

Any man who hasn't contracted enough will power to find loyalty to his wife, is a bald face liar if he says he can be found loyal in the name of state secrets.

If you can't be loyal to someone you love, how are you going to be loyal to a people who would rather spit on you and die than love you back. You can't. Both of these generals are weak, and do not deserve to lead men. They definitely have no business with having state secrets.

edit on 13-11-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)

Finally someone gets it. I keep hearing about how this is a setup to cover this or that, but no mention of the fact that the men should not have put themselves in that situation in the first place.

Does anyone find it odd that two Republican congressmen knew about the Petraeus thing in October, but President Obama didn't know about it until November 7th?

Originally posted by butcherguy
Does anyone find it odd that two Republican congressmen knew about the Petraeus thing in October, but President Obama didn't know about it until November 7th?

Yes, my head is spinning.

Originally posted by butcherguy
Does anyone find it odd that two Republican congressmen knew about the Petraeus thing in October, but President Obama didn't know about it until November 7th?

Which begs the question, plausible deniability or is he surrounded by people that knows he just doesn't care so they didn't tell him?

I think it's the latter. I don't think he cares and there are people doing his job for him and just tells him his talking points before going on camera.

Originally posted by OneisOne

Originally posted by butcherguy
Does anyone find it odd that two Republican congressmen knew about the Petraeus thing in October, but President Obama didn't know about it until November 7th?

Which begs the question, plausible deniability or is he surrounded by people that knows he just doesn't care so they didn't tell him?

I think it's the latter. I don't think he cares and there are people doing his job for him and just tells him his talking points before going on camera.

I always thought that someone else was running the show too, but he allows it to happen, he gives them full reign.

Originally posted by OneisOne

Originally posted by butcherguy
Does anyone find it odd that two Republican congressmen knew about the Petraeus thing in October, but President Obama didn't know about it until November 7th?

Which begs the question, plausible deniability or is he surrounded by people that knows he just doesn't care so they didn't tell him?

I think it's the latter. I don't think he cares and there are people doing his job for him and just tells him his talking points before going on camera.

If it is the latter, that is a scary thought. A POTUS that couldn't give a S&%T what happens.

Originally posted by butcherguy
If it is the latter, that is a scary thought. A POTUS that couldn't give a S&%T what happens.

Well honesty I kept going between that and early on-set alzheimer's.

All I know is something hinky is going on with this administration and all signs point to the fact the president has checked out.

Originally posted by butcherguy

Does anyone find it odd that two Republican congressmen knew about the Petraeus thing in October, but President Obama didn't know about it until November 7th?

Apparently, the FBI agent that started the investigation spilled the beans first to Eric Cantor and it went from there. However, I'm sure everyone was in the know, including Obama, before election day. I'm sure it was a mutual decision to keep the whole thing quiet until afterwards.