posted on Nov, 13 2012 @ 07:45 AM
Originally posted by Rubic0n
That which you just said in your second post was not said or made clear in anyway in your first response.
That's because I didn't state any view in my first post. I generally prefer just to state facts (and refer to relevant sources) and let other people
draw their own conclusions. I've said this repeatedly over the years on ATS, most recently at:
I therefore felt I had to respond when you implied that I was trying to "convince" people that the FBI conclusion was valid. I repeat that I wasn't
trying to persuade anyone - I was mentioning a relevant resource (the FBI documents relating to its investigation of the MJ-12 documents) and briefly
summarising their content. Members of ATS are welcome to draw their own conclusions from that summary or, even better, have a look at the documents I
mention and then draw their own conclusions.
Anyway, other people can read my posts above and see if I was trying to "convince" anyone of anything so I'll stop here.
edit on 13-11-2012 by
IsaacKoi because: (no reason given)