It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SPECULUM
Texas does happen to have in their possession, the entire dismantled nuclear weapons arsenal. So they do actually have a bargaining chip
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by caladonea
Well, they are now joined by people in 20 other states. This could catch on and blaze a trail of opposition to BO's centralized Nanny State. They already have their own Border Patrol and I bet the National Guard would join them.
There are lots of people who are not willing to become the United Soviet Socialist States of America.
This is why the BO admin had to put down as many militia groups as possible. It's also why he and his minions had to minimize the Tea Party opposition to his redistributionist Big Govt agenda.edit on 13-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Originally posted by SPECULUM
Texas does happen to have in their possession, the entire dismantled nuclear weapons arsenal. So they do actually have a bargaining chip
Keep dreaming on that. That stuff would be secured and moved a.s.a.p. with orders of shoot to kill while they are transporting part of 1st ID out of Fort Hood.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by caladonea
Well, they are now joined by people in 20 other states. This could catch on and blaze a trail of opposition to BO's centralized Nanny State. They already have their own Border Patrol and I bet the National Guard would join them.
There are lots of people who are not willing to become the United Soviet Socialist States of America.
This is why the BO admin had to put down as many militia groups as possible. It's also why he and his minions had to minimize the Tea Party opposition to his redistributionist Big Govt agenda.edit on 13-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Same thing keep dreaming. Even the National Guard took an oath which recognizes the POTUS as Commander and Chief. Texas is the only state that has the right to succeed from the Union so concentrate on what is in the realm of possibility. No soldier worth a damn is going to commit treason because of some disgruntled sore losers. Besides the majority of those who voted in the military voted for Obama. Do yourselves a favor and stick with what is remotely possible which is that Texas has the right to succeed from the union. I was thought that back in JR High when I lived in Texas it is one of the things we were proud of.
Originally posted by jcarpenter
I don't currently live in Texas, but I've spent ten years of my life there.
I was number 78,255 when I signed the petition.
Originally posted by Dreine
Texas produces too much oil,
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by shaneslaughta
Tbh i hadent thought about that but the pieces fit in my eyes. But i only see the corruption come out from the onset of the FED.
JFK knew it and look what he got for his trouble.
Yup, the creation of the FED is when it became so apparent, but the corruption was there all along. Take the Homestead Act of 1862 ~ long before the federal reserve act was passed. Twice the amount of land sold to regular people through the HS act was given to the railroad barons and huge prime pieces of land were scooped up by wealthy speculators before the little people could scrape up enough money to buy their "fair share".
And when the people protested the result, guess what was blamed. Not enough staff and incompetence. But nothing was done to repair the damage and no one's head rolled. Does that ring any bells?
Big fat yes on JFK. He was the president and no one even knew about his silver certificates until it was too late for the people to back him on it. The media has always been our worst enemy.
Beyond that, they sent families into dangerous territories by giving land grants for homestead, like Oregon only 1 in 10 survived and then they found Grizzly's and Indians., hunger and starvation.
But once people had their land for some years the deeds were given to rich as favors and all those homes were not passed to the families that fought and died for them...this happened all over the states, politicians and rich were reallotted the land owned by the homesteaders.
Thank you for taking the time to participate in the "We the People" petition process. As President of the United States, I am happy to respond personally to the petitioners.
The US Constitution does not provide the President with any power to assist with the secession of a Sovereign State from our Union. Article V of the US Constitution specifically excludes participation by the President, Executive Branch, or Judicial Branch in the amendment process. The authority to amend the Constitution, such as to revoke a signature of that document, resides only with State Governments and the US Congress. The President does not sign Constitutional amendments, and has no ability to veto amendments. The power to reject or amend the Constitution exists solely with the people.
Therefore, it is not possible for me to consider this petition, since it is outside the jurisdiction of my office. Petitioners who wish to continue this discussion should contact their respective State and Federal representatives.
With that understanding, the President can advocate strongly for or against any amendment to our Constitution, as is the right of all US citizens. In this case, I forcefully argue against this idea of secession.
We should appreciate our unique position in the world. Our unity has made us immensely strong, permitting us to face with confidence the many challenges of our complex world and the uncertainties of our future. In our great union, no State needs to stand alone. We are all owners of a great instrument for the betterment of ourselves, our children, and all mankind. This invention spans all US States, and is applied to all Americans equally. Each generation of Americans is tasked with preserving and enhancing this gift, which exists only because of the devotion and sacrifice of all those who have preceded us.
To consider dismantling this Great Union is not something I can facilitate in any manner.
Finally, please note that our Constitution guarantees the petitioners full rights to freedom of speech. Although I do not agree with the goals of the petition, it is my duty and honor to defend your rights to this freedom, at it is my duty to defend all parts of the Constitution and the great nation it has established.
Thank you once again for signing the online petition.
Originally posted by alldaylong
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by shaneslaughta
Tbh i hadent thought about that but the pieces fit in my eyes. But i only see the corruption come out from the onset of the FED.
JFK knew it and look what he got for his trouble.
Yup, the creation of the FED is when it became so apparent, but the corruption was there all along. Take the Homestead Act of 1862 ~ long before the federal reserve act was passed. Twice the amount of land sold to regular people through the HS act was given to the railroad barons and huge prime pieces of land were scooped up by wealthy speculators before the little people could scrape up enough money to buy their "fair share".
And when the people protested the result, guess what was blamed. Not enough staff and incompetence. But nothing was done to repair the damage and no one's head rolled. Does that ring any bells?
Big fat yes on JFK. He was the president and no one even knew about his silver certificates until it was too late for the people to back him on it. The media has always been our worst enemy.
Beyond that, they sent families into dangerous territories by giving land grants for homestead, like Oregon only 1 in 10 survived and then they found Grizzly's and Indians., hunger and starvation.
But once people had their land for some years the deeds were given to rich as favors and all those homes were not passed to the families that fought and died for them...this happened all over the states, politicians and rich were reallotted the land owned by the homesteaders.
Oregon was hardly a "Barren Wildness" when Americans began to settle there. Oregon for most was owned by The British Hudson Bay Company, and they formed the Government of the day in Oregon.
Oregon was hardly a "Barren Wildness" when Americans began to settle there. Oregon for most was owned by The British Hudson Bay Company, and they formed the Government of the day in Oregon.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by alldaylong
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by shaneslaughta
Tbh i hadent thought about that but the pieces fit in my eyes. But i only see the corruption come out from the onset of the FED.
JFK knew it and look what he got for his trouble.
Yup, the creation of the FED is when it became so apparent, but the corruption was there all along. Take the Homestead Act of 1862 ~ long before the federal reserve act was passed. Twice the amount of land sold to regular people through the HS act was given to the railroad barons and huge prime pieces of land were scooped up by wealthy speculators before the little people could scrape up enough money to buy their "fair share".
And when the people protested the result, guess what was blamed. Not enough staff and incompetence. But nothing was done to repair the damage and no one's head rolled. Does that ring any bells?
Big fat yes on JFK. He was the president and no one even knew about his silver certificates until it was too late for the people to back him on it. The media has always been our worst enemy.
Beyond that, they sent families into dangerous territories by giving land grants for homestead, like Oregon only 1 in 10 survived and then they found Grizzly's and Indians., hunger and starvation.
But once people had their land for some years the deeds were given to rich as favors and all those homes were not passed to the families that fought and died for them...this happened all over the states, politicians and rich were reallotted the land owned by the homesteaders.
Oregon was hardly a "Barren Wildness" when Americans began to settle there. Oregon for most was owned by The British Hudson Bay Company, and they formed the Government of the day in Oregon.
yeah the ones that lived through the disease and accidents and starvation of the trail had it really nice in a Holiday Inn because there was already British Hudson Bay Company.
Elizabeth Dixon Smith in 1847, stated that they were so crowded in their leaky little shack that "you could have stirred us with a stick". Those who were already sick from the hardships of the trail often died due to the winter conditions that took the final toll.
www.oregonpioneers.com...
I was able to enter actives off limits to the public, and read original letters by the setters because I traveled the whole of the USA with a history teacher who was writing a book.
Here where I live we have many histories and monuments to these brave settlers who died or lost children to settle the area.
Enlisted: The first oath, voted on 14 June 1775 as part of the act creating the Continental Army, read: "I _____ have, this day, voluntarily enlisted myself, as a soldier, in the American continental army, for one year, unless sooner discharged: And I do bind myself to conform, in all instances, to such rules and regulations, as are, or shall be, established for the government of the said Army." The original wording was effectively replaced by Section 3, Article 1, of the Articles of War approved by Congress on 20 September 1776, which specified that the oath of enlistment read: "I _____ swear (or affirm as the case may be) to be trued to the United States of America, and to serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies opposers whatsoever; and to observe and obey the orders of the Continental Congress, and the orders of the Generals and officers set over me by them."
the orders of the Generals and officers set over me by them."
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Originally posted by SPECULUM
Texas does happen to have in their possession, the entire dismantled nuclear weapons arsenal. So they do actually have a bargaining chip
Keep dreaming on that. That stuff would be secured and moved a.s.a.p. with orders of shoot to kill while they are transporting part of 1st ID out of Fort Hood.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by caladonea
Well, they are now joined by people in 20 other states. This could catch on and blaze a trail of opposition to BO's centralized Nanny State. They already have their own Border Patrol and I bet the National Guard would join them.
There are lots of people who are not willing to become the United Soviet Socialist States of America.
This is why the BO admin had to put down as many militia groups as possible. It's also why he and his minions had to minimize the Tea Party opposition to his redistributionist Big Govt agenda.edit on 13-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Same thing keep dreaming. Even the National Guard took an oath which recognizes the POTUS as Commander and Chief. Texas is the only state that has the right to succeed from the Union so concentrate on what is in the realm of possibility. No soldier worth a damn is going to commit treason because of some disgruntled sore losers. Besides the majority of those who voted in the military voted for Obama. Do yourselves a favor and stick with what is remotely possible which is that Texas has the right to succeed from the union. I was thought that back in JR High when I lived in Texas it is one of the things we were proud of.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by Secesh
...
Can you please find the part of the constitution it states a fringe group that is upset with who was elected and are acting like children that want to leave home are to be considered the government which I am supposed to jump sides and defend.
If you don’t like the way the government is being run then use the legal means to change it. Here is a thought try getting the millions of people who didn’t vote this election that sent a clear message to the government that they are happy with the status Quo and are fine with others choosing their leaders for them to get off the couch next time and vote if they are not happy with how things turned out otherwise please do not assume you speak for the 300 plus million citizens of the United States of America. ...
Originally posted by Secesh
As for the legal means to change it, since the United States violated the constitution by enacting the 17th amendment and direct election of U.S. senators. The STATES no longer have a republican form of government as guaranteed under Article 4 Section 4. So there is the legal hook to get out of the 'union.'
Originally posted by Secesh
reply to post by Ghost375
You can't amend a contract without addressing all parts of the contract that are affected by it, to do so would make the contract and/or the amendment invalid.edit on 13-11-2012 by Secesh because: clarity