posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 01:20 PM
I find the article less conspiracy bashing, but ultimately a desire to implant the idea that the only truth is coming from CNN, it even uses the
phrase, 'Partisan media' and presumably not a reference to CNN itself. Anyway I was just coming to the conclusion that we are expected to believe that
there are no conspiracies, when in the latter stages of the article, the writer trots out what could be considered quite a considerable list of events
that had much more than a grain of thruth,
and that includes Climategate, which is still ongoing, and one where recently, a key player was found to
have sent an E-mail
to a possible publicist, two days after Climategate occurred, so
that story is far from over, and not much chance of an overall consensus yet.
edit on 12-11-2012 by smurfy because: Link.