reply to post by cultureoftruth
You're not making sense. You're saying that the Z-film has been edited - thus tampered with - as highlighted in your post here:
Greer's left shoulder does NOT rotate to the right in Zapruder but does so, clearly in both the Nix and Muchmore films. His left arm comes
down right after the shot, which directly contradicts the video effect (in Zapruder) that flickers about near and below the top of the door.
..Yet, in this previous post
, and finally
, you're using still images from the Z- film to try and back up
the claims you're making. Sorry but no, you can't have it both ways like that. The film is either fake, or It's real. You can't just take parts of
it and say "Hey, this means this!", and when challenged on something else you don't like, say something along the lines of "Oh no you're wrong
because It's actually fake". If It's fake then as a true researcher the evidence is tampered with thus rendering it useless. You don't get to pick
and choose as you please and you will be called on it.
Now, something else I notice is the fact that to make your claims you're also using low quality images. Whether coincidental or purposeful I don't
know, but It's a common theme with Greer-assassin believers. But, the fact is high qulity images are available, or images we have can be turned into
better quality. Low quality images were the reason why this theory came about in the first place, as the low quality make it seem like something that
was not there, was. So, if you want to be taken seriously here, provide high quality images so we can all see what you're saying, otherwise no one
can and will take you seriously at all. No true
Greer's left hand, left the wheel some time before frame 241 and didn't return until after the shot.
Here's Frame 312, 1/18th of a second prior to the fatal headshot.
When we zoom in and adjust the quality somewhat we can see both hands of Greer that little bit clearer.
We'll also notice that no gun is present in his left hand either.
Also, why haven’t you mentioned the rather simple questions Bob Harris mentions in his above video? The only mention I've seen you make of him is
when you insult his film, but you never actually made any attempt to acknowledge or refute what he said. If Greer was responsible, surely what he said
can be explained away, can it not? To this day whenever I get into a debate with a Greer-shooter believer, these questions have always been ignored.
Maybe you can be the first to conclusively answer them all rationally.
Oh, for those who did not watch the video, these were the simple questions he brought up:
There was literally hundreds of people in Dealey Plaza that day, how come none of them climbed that Greer blew off the Presidents head?
Assuming he got somehow got lucky and no one on scene happened to realize that he had just fired a shot at the President [Despite might I add
myself that witnesses were at all angles
], shouldn't he be trying to escape? Why did he drive him to the hospital and stick around at which point
not knowing whether he would've gotten away with it.
Why did none of the secret service personal claim Greer fired a shot? Do you really think Clint Hill who risked his life to get to the Kennedy's
limousine was in on the cover-up?
Oh, and a question of my own here - If Greer did fire the head shot, what does that say about the previous shot to his throat and also the injuries to
Connolly? Surely he wasn't responsible for that as well.
So, let’s have some answers and let’s get somewhere with this case.