posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 03:02 PM
reply to post by FlyersFan
I can't believe how transparent they are, actually. I believe that a person does not get to a key position of government without having dirt as a
fail-safe, to be used in such a case. I believe it's just part of the gig. It certainly seems that Patreas is going with the flow on this one. Then
again, I also believe that our "democracy" is nothing but a Pro-wrestling spectacle, a brilliant way to alleviate the tension inherent in the old
model where one King was just appointed; give them a "choice" of two. I think we are now an official Idiocracy (as illistrated in the movie of the
same name lol)
Seriously though, what is truly appalling about this is the reports that he will simply be excluded (or excused) from testifying. That's crazy. That's
all it takes? He WAS the director at the time. I was thinking that even if he does testify, the media smoke screen is up on full blast in the
supposedly respectable papers; they all look like cheap tabloids running this "sex scandal." So, it will either push the news of the hearing back out
of reach of most people, or they will blame him for the intelligence failures....being busy with his whores and having no time to "direct." But I
can't believe he just gets to stay home and watch game shows that day now.
I also believe the BS is that it was not an embassy or a consulate at all but, as Obama and Hilary now call it, a "mission," which basically means
anywhere where representatives meet to do business. In this case it was the business of hiring rebels. And if this story is made clear to the idiocy,
then the next step would likely be that "alqueda operatives" were getting mixed in with this group....since they ARE the same group of
mercenaries...and that would be a form of treason and might even be clear enough to get through to them.
Of course, this is all just an educated guess on my part. I didn't read any other posts as of this minute, but I look forward to reading all of the
them and seeing what everyone else thinks.
edit on 12-11-2012 by shonnfrank because: (no reason given)