posted on Nov, 14 2012 @ 06:28 AM
Originally posted by paraphi
reply to post by RationalDespair
I did read the OP. Unfortunately, the source is a hoax. If you think anyone who contests the validity of the OP material is a debunker, then there
is no hope for debate.
Unfortunately while some search every possible source to see if this is true or not, providing some plausible and factual data that can prove or
debunk this completely, "debunkers" just come here with one or 2liners "contesting" everything but not providing any source to their debunking
It's pretty unfair that for something to be proven truth you have to back it up with 1000 studies, photos, films, math, physics, mechanics etc, but
to debunk something its only needed a "this is a hoax. kkthxbye".
If I happen to find something that completely disproves any of this, I will post it as a fake - have no problem whatsoever doing so... but I havent.
The font reference for instance - although wrong, at least it shows the person actually looked at the document and had a keen eye to spot something
that looked awkward to him. But people in any field trying to disprove something just by saying "HOAX kkthxbye" without anything to back it up is
just ridiculous. Always have been.
Unless you're the Church. Then you're allowed to say "LIES. ITS THE WRATH OF GOD" but you can see where the Church stands now as we only listen to
the vatican academics and yet, will still replicate everything they do to be sure they're not, you know... "misplacing" anything.
Prove this is a hoax and I'm sure everyone in here will be thankful - either truth or lies, but it needs proof of either one or another. It goes both
ways exactly the same way.