Interesting that such a ground breaking theory with absolutely no flaws in either factual or logical reasoning; that can and does provide so many explanations both on a scientific and spiritual level; has received almost no attention here in the scientific forum on ATS( even from the usual debunkers). Nor very much in the wider scientific media as a whole...

I think this in itself speaks volumes about the present day attitudes of most of those within the established scientific community. Nobody raises an eyebrow when discussing the quantum phenomena of moving forwards or backwards in time, particles existing in more than one place at once or amazing experiments such as the double slit and the eraser experiments. But when it comes to the subject of human consciousness and many of the fundamental questions such as life after death no one wants to touch it with a 10 foot pole.

And to tell you the truth I think it's pathetic and one of the many reasons society today is so screwed up. Everyone's so busy sticking their heads in the sand studying their own insignificant piece of the puzzle that noone sees the larger picture and the possible ramifications these theories bring up. The strange thing is after so many years of slapping each other on the back while bagging out religious and new age types two well respected scientists have come up with a legitimate theory (and have the maths and reasoning to back it up) which may well see most of them many of them eating their own words. And yet they simply ignore it or click on fb to see which spiritual belief Richard Dawkins is bagging out now on 'I f---ing love science'.

THIS shows that the mystics were right (in their own way).

THIS explains why conscious can affect matter outside the confines of the human brain both backwards and forwards in time (double slit and eraser experiments)

THIS explains the placebo effect.

THIS explains the many recent experiments that show statistically significant responses in the human body prior to various large scale stimuli (i.e. the human body predicting the future)

THIS is the most logical explanation for a multitude of phenomena such as ghosts, ESP, clairvoyance, near death experience etc.

I myself have always suspected that consciousness resides mainly in the quantum world ever since I did a few physics subjects when studying for my science degree. The very fact we still cannot explain what consciousness is or even where exactly within the brain it resides only reflects the fact that the Newtonian world of classical science cannot not will not ever be able to fully explain human consciousness. The very fact that everything we see around us today when broken down to its fundamental level is merely quantum particles/waves and energy fluxes speaks volumes in itself. Yet for some reason most scientist believe that for whatever reason there's some magical divide between the quantum world and the macroscopic world with absolutely no overlap whatsoever. This is in itself a logically flawed concept.

I fully believe that one day science and spirituality will meet and finally agree though I wonder how many people will even take notice.

(Btw sorry for the high amount of grammatical errors but its quite tricky typing out such a long response on ones phone)

Peace out - 1lw

Our brains are inside a vehicle and this being our bodies. The common senses as well as our legs and arms are designed for survival. Quantum Mechanics is a part of reality our bodies have trouble directly observing, that does not mean our brain cannot.

"Classical" thinking is about developing a model that is consistent with what the common sense's can identify as real.

It is not difficult to understand why this can be a problem.

Any thoughts?

Memories can be accessed by personal experiences, and if it is important enough for one emotionally they remember.

Any thoughts?

Watched the video. I believe the theory to be truth. I also believe proof of this in some way is such and I'd like to hear other ideas on it.

Tubulin protein dimer sub units is the biological reflection of our technological fibre optics!

Originally posted by Kashai
Memories can be accessed by personal experiences, and if it is important enough for one emotionally they remember.

Any thoughts?

define your terms in that sentence to realize that sentence did not explain anything, at least in the mechanical depth the OP is seeking and pondering on..

Originally posted by ImaFungi

Originally posted by Kashai
Memories can be accessed by personal experiences, and if it is important enough for one emotionally they remember.

Any thoughts?

define your terms in that sentence to realize that sentence did not explain anything, at least in the mechanical depth the OP is seeking and pondering on..

Actually freind I was responding to Druid 42.

My impression is that treating fundamental subjective experiences is irrelevant, bespeaks of a condition where feelings are outside nature. I mean this in the sense that given human subjective experiences can be defined as mere waste material, that is irrelevant to nature, then it is not a part of nature. Effectively the existence of consciousness can be argued though, in relation to the ability of consciousness to do work? Consciousness if invalid should not be able to solve problems, beyond what an animal can.

Therein exist the failure of Materialism, that humans do not respond well to positive reinforcement, Pavlovian or Skinner-an behavioral models. Alternatively, emotions developed due to the fact they are an inherent part of reality.

Any thoughts?

I agree the human brain supports quantum consciousness, but I think the problem explaining it is that there just isn't a cut and paste kind of proof. Quantum consciousness needs to be experienced in a way that leaves a memory trail that can be audited (to use the Scientology term). People eventually will see for themselves that reality is in most cases a superposition of possibilities (more so these days due to the way they are layering the MSM events).

Unfortunately validating quantum consciousness opens the door to all kinds of revisionist history possibilities and might not be a comfortable experience for many people. Look how posters on ATS respond to threads involving subject matter "labeled insane".

Originally posted by Kashai
Memories can be accessed by personal experiences, and if it is important enough for one emotionally they remember.

Any thoughts?

Tiggers.

What do you think about DNA passed down info that can be accessed through the brain say as a processor to serve/affect the consciousness?