Originally posted by RamsOnTop
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by delboy2424
I have been on David Icke site and there is over 600 pages about this. also check out Chris Spivey Parliament paedophiles. sorry new on here don't
know how to post links yet. but i think this a big can of worms that has been opened and it can't all be lies some of it might be true and if it is
then we NEED justice for these children and not swept under the carpet again. Good luck with this thread.
I fear the mention of David Icke, I really do. There is so much about him that makes absolutely no sense, and any regular person out there looking
into this and seeing his material is more inclined to dismiss him as a crazy person.
I mentioned before that it seems he has been correct on several things, and his assertions about this might be right too. But he's just not a
credible person to present in my opinion.
Thanks for the suggestion of a link, I'll do a little searching on all the suggestions a little later and compile as many as I can into one post.
Why do you think Icke makes no sense? What is SO much about him that doesn't make sense? I see a man fighting to get the truth out. They laughed at
him 25 yrs ago when he fingered high profile people to peadophile rinks. And look where we are today. We're still laughing at him for all his
claims but it seems to me that he is more spot on than any other consipracy theorist.
This is the problem with many conspiracy theories - they continue to be theories unless there is concrete evidence. People like Icke may be right
about one thing or another, but that doesn't mean that it was anything more than a lucky guess, or repeating something read in an investigation.
We have a lot of people here who confuse fact with fiction. Many members of ATS blindly accept what someone says in the YouTube video or on a blog as
being true, when there is absolutely no evidence to back it up. I've seen people on ATS supporting the most out there ideas based on a blog post from
some random person, even when there is a wealth of actual evidence and more basic probability that it's false.
Ultimately, it all comes back to evidence.
People can have theories all they like, but those theories need to be based in some kind of evidence to be considered genuine. All Icke seems to do is
make statements of belief, or suggest that he's seen evidence, but there never is any evidence offered.
Of course, any ideas and theories suggested by others could be real, there might be truth there. A conspiracy theory is only a theory until it becomes
fact. But to get to a point where it is fact you have to have enough concrete evidence and not base everything simply on another man and his beliefs