Originally posted by newcovenant
These sources are so much more credible, respected and more reliable than yours.
What does the UN know? They get their information from these sources. UN Scientist? Is that like a Panamanian Plastic Surgeon?
So what NASA scientists, and other scientists have to say are less credible than a website named "windows"...
Like always, you won't stand down in face of facts...
If there was any truth to your RELIGION, then your idols and masters wouldn't need to do this...
The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night
admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.
Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not
rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.
In an interview with The Mail on Sunday, Dr Lal, the co-ordinating lead author of the report’s chapter on Asia, said: ‘It related to
several countries in this region and their water sources. We thought that if we can highlight it, it will impact policy-makers and politicians and
encourage them to take some concrete action.
‘It had importance for the region, so we thought we should put it in.’
Dr Lal’s admission will only add to the mounting furore over the melting glaciers assertion, which the IPCC was last week forced to withdraw because
it has no scientific foundation.
According to the IPCC’s statement of principles, its role is ‘to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis, scientific,
technical and socio-economic information – IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy’.
The claim that Himalayan glaciers are set to disappear by 2035 rests on two 1999 magazine interviews with glaciologist Syed Hasnain, which were then
recycled without any further investigation in a 2005 report by the environmental campaign group WWF.
It was this report that Dr Lal and his team cited as their source.
The WWF article also contained a basic error in its arithmetic. A claim that one glacier was retreating at the alarming rate of 134 metres a year
should in fact have said 23 metres – the authors had divided the total loss measured over 121 years by 21, not 121.
Last Friday, the WWF website posted a humiliating statement recognising the claim as ‘unsound’, and saying it ‘regrets any confusion caused’.
Dr Lal said: ‘We knew the WWF report with the 2035 date was “grey literature” [material not published in a
peer-reviewed journal]. But it was never picked up by any of the authors in our working group, nor by any of the more than 500 external reviewers, by
the governments to which it was sent, or by the final IPCC review editors.’
Whose work are you going to present? Mann's? The hypocrite who created the farse that is the Hockey Stick graph and which has been repudiated and
it's not even used any more even by the IPCC?...
What about "RealClimate.org" where Mann, and some other LIARS are directors of and who are linked to Al Gore, and whose registrant organization is
none other than Environmental Media Services?...
EMS's founder and President was Arlie Schardt, who also served as the National Press Secretary for Al Gore's
1988 presidential campaign, and as Gore's Communications Director during his 2000 bid for the White House.
Please go ahead and tell me whose work are you going to present?... The University of East Anglia which had "deleted all their climate data" claming
to get more space when in fact this act made possible that no one could check to see if their numbers were correct?...
Whose work huh? Jones, et al who have been caught red handed in their lies, and Jones himself contemplated suicide because he was caught in the
The scientist at the center of the "Climate-gate" e-mail scandal has revealed that he was so traumatized by the global backlash against him that
he contemplated suicide.
Professor Phil Jones said in an exclusive interview with The Sunday Times that he had thought about killing himself "several times."
He acknowledged similarities to Dr. David Kelly, the scientist who committed suicide after being exposed as the source for a BBC report that alleged
the government had "sexed up" evidence to justify the invasion of Iraq.
In e-mails that were hacked into and seized upon by global-warming sceptics before the Copenhagen climate summit in December, Jones appeared to call
upon his colleagues to destroy scientific data rather than release it to people intent on discrediting their work monitoring climate change.
Go ahead... are you talking about the "2,500 climate experts from the IPCC" which in fact over 2,400 are only policymakers who had made obscure
papers for their respective governments, for example on motorcycle safety, and whichs those governemnts were using as leverage to get what they want
from this farce?...
Only a few of those "2,500 experts", their numbers around 56, are real experts with degrees in Climate Science and most which disagree with the claim
that mankind is to blame... and most of them are the very scientists that the left LOVE to bash for not believing in anthropogenic global
One example of those REAL Climate Change scientists from the IPCC who have been trying to inform the ignorant masses to the truth behind Climate
Change is Alabama State Climatologist Dr. John Christy of the University of Alabama in Huntsville...
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Alabama State Climatologist Dr. John Christy of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, served as a UN IPCC lead author in 2001 for the 3rd
assessment report and detailed how he personally witnessed UN scientists attempting to distort the science for political purposes.
“I was at the table with three Europeans, and we were having lunch. And they were talking about their role as lead authors. And they were
talking about how they were trying to make the report so dramatic that the United States would just have to sign that Kyoto Protocol,”
Christy told CNN on May 2, 2007. – (For more on UN scientists turning on the UN years ago, see Climate Depot’s full report here.
Christy has since proposed major reforms and changes to the way the UN IPCC report is produced. Christy has rejected the UN approach that produces
“a document designed for uniformity and consensus.” Christy presented his views at a UN meeting in 2009. The IPCC needs “an alternative view
section written by well-credentialed climate scientists is needed,” Christy said. “If not, why not? What is there to fear? In a scientific area as
uncertain as climate, the opinions of all are required,” he added.
‘The reception to my comments was especially cold’
[The following is excerpted from Andrew Revkin's January 26, 2009 New York Times blog Dot Earth. For full article go here.]
Excerpt: Last March, more than 100 past [UN IPCC] lead authors of report chapters met in Hawaii to chart next steps for the panel’s inquiries. One
presenter there was John R. Christy, a climatologist at the University of Alabama, Huntsville, who has focused on using satellites to chart global
temperatures. He was a lead author of a section of the third climate report, in 2001, but is best known these days as a critic of the more heated
warnings that climate is already unraveling under the buildup of heat-trapping gases.
You don't have ANYTHING but deceipt, exagerations and lies, and that's the truth...
edit on 13-11-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason