reply to post by Tecumte
Originally posted by Tecumte
Originally posted by diesel_actual
Originally posted by Tecumte
Thanks, then IF the outside possibility, Dion was a target (as a couple have raised questions) then the 'incoming' might have taken out most of the
Longworth house before finishing it's trajectory into the Shirley home. Just a thought.
Dion was not a target, he was an home audio/video engineer for Indy Audio Labs, everybody pads there resume a lil bit ya know, neways if you were
goin to assassinate somebody in suburbs of america you dont just blow up a whole damn neighbor...they get in a "wreck" or "choke" on something,
something along those lines
Sure I don't disagree.(often your plane just drops out of the sky).
Unless (hypothetically only) of course, you wanted to test your targeting capabilities out. Maybe of a new weapon. Or system. Though it caused alot
of damage, still there apparently were only the two casualties.
Not saying Dion was a target by any means, just asking. I have no clue what he really did for a living. Just running with the idea of a possible
trajectory and any (possible) intent.
If it it was "a test" then what the victim did for a living is irrelevant me thinks.
I posted the test scenerio further up on page 38 of this thread. But ya know, I am not expecting you to read back that far of course. Since you are
thinking along the same lines, it is worth restating my alternative scenerio here one more time. That is my alternative explanation to that of the gas
explosion, if the evidence for that does not become any weaker than already is...
[original post by Tallone
Let's say it was intentional... if it is government or military linked then why then not do it quietly, and make it seem more like an accident? A car
accident for example?
Could be that it is some kind of weapon test or a show of strength. Maybe from afar. Maybe a target was randomly chosen... hence the weirdness of a
giant explosion in a quiet suburban neighborhood.
A show of strength by who we don't know, and neither do we know to who such a show of strength was intended for, because clearly they are not saying.
My favored extrapolation from that goes like this. I am going to number it to clarify the argument I make here.
1. It was a demonstration, from a powerful group.
2. A very powerful group obviously with access to the kind of weapons that if no tell-tale residue (thermite...) is found, could only come out of a
black project, and that means very high up access to elements within the military.
3. The group with that kind of power must be a part of the ruling elite
4. That means the demonstration, if that is what it was (and not a test in the first instance), was directed not at us as audience. We would be just
the bystanders. The intended audience is a majority ruling group
, presumably in America, but not necessarily in America. See point 6 below.
5. The aim is akin to blackmail. Something like concession or change is being demanded.
6. By leveling a section of a suburb on American soil
, the demonstration/statement they are making is that much more attention grabbing to the
intended audience (whoever the 'they' really is).
We are the periphery audience (like the critters in the wild) not the intended audience. They will not tell us the true story.
13-11-2012 by Tallone because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-11-2012 by Tallone because: (no reason given)