Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by OratoryHeist
You state that you don’t refer to the likes of Alex Jones or the truther camps for your information regarding 9/11 and nor to you seek out their
productions. You have also said that you believe “people need to think for themselves more on ATS” and have observed that for many if they can’t
read about it online or watch a youtube clip they are uninterested. Interestingly you have also said that you have done your own research I commend
you for this. However I do have one question could you please tell me what research you have done, at what level, and what sources you used.
I have visited a few places across the US, as well as got some friends to take pictures of some things for me.
I have looked at how the world works, whats important, what happens when 'this' or 'that' happens.
I have looked into what I believe would be a reason for a government to create an event like 9/11, to swindle a bit of cash, or build a pipeline in a
foreign country is just silly, it would be bigger, way more important.
I have observed how the US government operates, its foreign policy, basically, what is most important to the US.
I looked back beyond 9/11, as there would have to be lead up to 9/11 if it was staged.
I 'listened' to what was being repeated most often.
I used my 'right-brain', not just my 'left-brain', this is very important.
Because it seems to me based on this and other threads that you repeated state that others much “think for themselves” and demand their
“evidence” yet you are not quite so forthcoming when it comes to showing us your own evidence or demonstrating that you think for yourself as most
of what you say does sound like truther rhetoric.
If I sound like a truther, its probably because I have one foot in the truther camp, in that I know 9/11 was staged. I don't believe it was staged
for nefarious reasons, although I do know politicians are taking advantage of the situation.
What may be perceived as evidence to one person, is not readily perceived as evidence to others. Yet.
Regardless of whether or not you intend to do so much of what you say lacks any evidence and sounds very much like conspiracy theorist conjecture.
Your posts are filled with statements like “what if…” and “you don’t know that for sure” with plenty of claims that “you don’t think
for yourself” with lots of other assumptions and in addition to this you seem bent on defending the idea that 9/11 was not a terrorist attack.
Basically you are all talk with very little substance.
It's about getting people thinking. As you have said, truther rhetoric can be identified easily, so you can tell which have simply watched a utube,
or been listening to Jones. When you start asking people 'what if's..' and you guage their response, you can see who thinks for themself, you can
see who has a free mind and who is currently still controlled by 'the sales pitch'.
I could tell you right now what 'New World Order' actually means, but the problem is is that it is so far away from what people have been deluded
into thinking it means, that people won't believe it.
You can of course redeem this by actually telling us about your research and showing us your sources which you seem very reluctant to do.
There is nothing for me to redeem. You have shown that you are only interested in the official story, so whatever I say you would just try and shoot
down, or ignore.
You want me to feed your brain, I want you to think for yourself. Will you be thinking for yourself if I feed your brain?
Show me you can think for yourself and then we can debate converse all you like.