It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lonewolf10
so your saying that they set off a nuke in NYC?
immediate and devastating destruction in the area below and around it which caused a reinforced concrete building
Just saying...
I would assume that you are saying something along the lines of “here is a building that survived a nuclear bomb and hear is WTC7 which burned for a few hours and collapsed”.
To which is would say, “And….?”
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by maxella1
Errrr….. What is it you “just saying?”
All we have is a bunch of photos; you have not really drawn any conclusion from these photos and presented it as any kind of argument for us to debate. I would assume that you are saying something along the lines of “here is a building that survived a nuclear bomb and hear is WTC7 which burned for a few hours and collapsed”. To which is would say, “And….?”
This is just a thread so far with a bunch of pictures and nothing else, it’s all dressing and no salad.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by maxella1
immediate and devastating destruction in the area below and around it which caused a reinforced concrete building
Just one problem with your little fantasy.......
WTC 7 was not a reinforced concrete building
Just in case dont know was steel frame structure, the facade was black marble (North Face), red granite
(South Face) panels which were hung from the steel framing
It was not masonry like the Hiroshima Peace Memorial
Sorry you lose........
We need to get some steel reinforced concrete from Japan.
Do you know that it is very difficult to take any of your debates seriously when you insist on making these pointless points with implied sarcasm?
Tell me the significance of this, why is this important, what does it tell us, form a argument and actually debate because If all you are capable of is sarcasm then we cant take you seriously and as such I cant take this thread seriously.
Why do people do this when it comes to 9/11, they look at what happened in the past and refuse to recognise the events of 9/11 as unique. Sure Murrah building stayed standing after a bomb blast big deal, it was not a exact replica of WTC 7 that had another building essentially collapse onto it, it was not subject to the exact same forces as WTC 7.
People talk about WTC 7 all the time what about WTC 4, 5, 6 and the Marriott that all had to be demolished, heck there wasn’t much left of them to demolish. WTC 7 is treated like it’s the “smoking gun” it’s not, I mean if they demolished the other buildings within a few days/ weeks then why would it matter about WTC 7. I ask this question all the time and never get a reasonable answer. Why bother demolishing WTC 7?
Even a nuclear bomb didn't make a steel reinforced concrete building to completely collapse. Get it?
Check the tenants in WTC 7 and you'll see why
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by maxella1
Check the tenants in WTC 7 and you'll see why
oh you mean the DoD, CIA and IRS all shearing one single floor and the New York Office of Emergancy Management, that proves nothing.
I understand what you are trying to say but you must recognise that such comparisons are unfair both buildings where build differently at different times and both were damaged under different circumstances as such the forces each building where subjected to where different and the end result was also different. These comparisons are not “proof” of anything all they do is serve as casually curiosities and interesting snippets of history, they do not contribute to 9/11 truth is anyway because they have nothing to do with 9/11.
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
The plane dropped the bomb--known as "Little Boy"--by parachute at 8:15 in the morning, and it exploded 2,000 feet above Hiroshima in a blast equal to 12-15,000 tons of TNT, destroying five square miles of the city.
WTC 7 was not a reinforced concrete building
Yes you're right about this one. It was a steel framed structure. But WTC 1 and 2 were reinforced concrete buildings. So I still say the Japanese have better reinforced concrete and we should get some from them
At 8:15 on August 6, 1945, Little Boy — the first atomic bomb to be used in war — detonated almost directly above the dome. The building's vertical columns were able to resist the nearly vertical downward force of the blast, and parts of the concrete and brick outer walls remained intact. The center of the blast was displaced 490 feet (150 m) horizontally and 1,968 feet (600 m) vertically from the dome, having slightly missed the original target, the distinctive "T"-shaped Aioi Bridge.. Everyone inside the building was killed instantly
Doesn't sound like the much of the building was left after the blast
One thing about concrete is that it is strong in compression so the vertical forces on the columns would be better resisted than a lateral force