It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But how could airliners flown by humans hit the towers that accurately?
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
I have not watched this video, sorry but I am not got to spend half an hour watching something that based on what the OP has said suggests there were not plains/victims.
I hate these “no plane” theories because of one very simple reason; they are an insult to the victims and the dead with very little proof to back anything up. My uncle was on business in New York on 9/11 he personally witnessed the second plane hit the tower. There are hundreds of families who lost loved ones on those planes to say there were no planes is to say these people did not exist, furthermore it says that the grieving families are someway implicated in all of this. It’s simply hurtful nonsense without a single scrape of evidence to back it up.
I wish people would think of the families before they start dabbling in armature pseudoscience and revisionist history, because that is what most of you are writing, your ignorance would be funny if it were not so hurtful to the families.
but so far I haven't met a single person in real life that believe this crap.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by maxella1
but so far I haven't met a single person in real life that believe this crap.
Because it's an 'internet' conspiracy.
Shut down the web and Richard Gage would have to get a real job.
Originally posted by samkent
Because it's an 'internet' conspiracy.
Shut down the web and Richard Gage would have to get a real job.
That reminds me...has anyone heard anything more about the Korey Rowe arrest?
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
reply to post by NWOwned
I am sick of these comparisons to the Empire State Building impact.
What was the weight of that plane?
What was the velocity of that plane? How did the woman Edna Centron get to the opening? What was she walking on? Was the aircraft an airliner? If the planes impacted at certain spots to take out particular companies then how could human pilots do it?
The entire physics profession not discussing the "center of mass" of the tilted top portion of the south tower for ELEVEN YEARS is more interesting than aircraft impacts however. It says something about the science/academic establishment that goes beyond 9/11. The Laws of Physics are more important than 9/11.
The total destruction of the buildings must be explained regardless of the aircraft. I am not getting on the no planes merry-go-round.
psik
Originally posted by NWOwned
How did the woman Edna Centron get to the opening?
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by GoodOlDave
I always enjoy reading your posts especially after you take a little vacation.
Have you tried following the real money Dave?