Languages Don't Begin with Grunts, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 1-5-2003 @ 06:26 PM by Lysergic
Reading The Evolution of a Creationist

Lemme type this up real quick
=================================
"The study of language has developed into a complex field of scholarship. Linguist tell us that languages get more and more complex the farther back they trace them. The older ("more primitive") a language is, the more complex it appears to be. This is powerful evidence against evolution.
If evolution is true and man gradually evolved from more primitive creatures, language should get more and more simple the older it is said to be. Prehistoric man should have communicated first with grunts; then with single syllables; then with mutli-syllabic words (ba-na-na); then, with setence fragments, developing into sentecnes ("I want banana"), etc. What is found is just the ooposite. early languages such as Sumerian are so complex that only a handful of the most brilliant scholars can decipher them. The Tower of Babel incident explains the races and the problem of complex "primitive" languages. God created the languages instantly and fully mature. Evolution offers no good explanation for the complexity of the earlist known languages! Linguistic researchers from around the world have published their ideas concerning the geographic location of our "primitive" mother tongue. Linguists call this language Proto-Indo-European. Two Russian linguistic experts, Thomas Gamkrelidze and Vyacheslav Ivanov, have offered evidence "...that Indo-European originated in an area known as Anatolia, which is now part of Turkey, and from there spread throughout Europe and the sub-continet." (see U.S. News and World Report, Nov. 5, 1990, page 62)
U.S. News and World Report was not the first publication to report that language can be traced back to Turkey. The Bible records fro us that Noah and his family had their post-flood beginnings in Turkey: And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat
(Genesis 8:4).

Scientists trace Language back to a particular place on earth, the Bible would describe that place to be the mountains of Ararat in Turkey. The linguists agree!
===================================


[Edited on 1-5-2003 by Lysergic]


reply posted on 1-5-2003 @ 09:15 PM by HKoT
LoL this is the dumbest thread I've ever seen.

The two most complex languages the world has ever seen are English, and Mandarin. Mandarin because it has what, 1000 characters?

The English language, because it is a "spoken langauge".

Just because people today use 50,000 words and say "yo" and "hommie" more than anything else, doesn't make english any less advanced than it was in the 17 and 1800s.

The English language is a mastery of exactitude. With it you can convey any emotion, any idea, any thought, concious or unconcious, any color and any concept or philosophy or feeling or flavor or smell or sound.

English can explain the world better then almost any other language on earth, my learning russian showed this, you have NO idea how restricting russian is as a language.

And I'm sure people who are coming from other languages can see how much freedom English allows when you master it.

Ancient languages are not more complex than English.

For instance the babylonians had no concept of "zero" for anything that was "zero" didn't exist and so they never spoke of it, never concieved of it.

Well I feel I've said enough, looks like we all can go back to English Class, we all need a refresher.

*EDIT* Oh and I forgot to mention but there are plenty of languages that do not stem from Indo-European. The Bushmen speak a language consisting of Clicks and whistles. The Aboriginees have their own language too as do the Chinese and other oriental peoples.

[Edited on 2-5-2003 by HKoT]



reply posted on 2-5-2003 @ 09:59 AM by Byrd
The author is making some rather biased points, and they don't really fit in with modern research.

Originally posted by Lysergic
Reading The Evolution of a Creationist
If evolution is true and man gradually evolved from more primitive creatures, language should get more and more simple the older it is said to be. Prehistoric man should have communicated first with grunts; then with single syllables; then with mutli-syllabic words (ba-na-na); then, with setence fragments, developing into sentecnes ("I want banana"), etc.


As others have pointed out, this is a fairly bogus argument. We have no clue what prehistoric man said. They forgot to invent the record player during the ice ages.


What is found is just the ooposite. early languages such as Sumerian are so complex that only a handful of the most brilliant scholars can decipher them.


Argh! Bogus! The reason they're hard to decypher is that they vanished and there are few records in multiple languages so we have to piece out what they say by a lot of detective work. Until the Rosetta Stone was found, we couldn't translate ancient Egyptian.


The Tower of Babel incident explains the races and the problem of complex "primitive" languages.


Only if you ignore other evidence.


God created the languages instantly and fully mature.


Uh... no. WE created languages from other languages and can actually trace them backwards. As societies get isolated, they devleop "family" and "slang" words that turn into a language different from their mother tongue. We can trace British English and American English and Australian English (which all sound different and have unique words) back to a common Old English and that to still older languages.

Languages are like family trees. Your grandparents didn't just suddenly show up out of thin air. They had parents and so on and so forth. Languages show the migration of people and the technology.


Evolution offers no good explanation for the complexity of the earlist known languages!


The author doesn't understand evolution.


Linguistic researchers from around the world have published their ideas concerning the geographic location of our "primitive" mother tongue. Linguists call this language Proto-Indo-European. Two Russian linguistic experts, Thomas Gamkrelidze and Vyacheslav Ivanov, have offered evidence "...that Indo-European originated in an area known as Anatolia, which is now part of Turkey, and from there spread throughout Europe and the sub-continent."


Well, they did get that much right. That's one theory.



The Bible records fro us that Noah and his family had their post-flood beginnings in Turkey: And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat (Genesis 8:4).


...a location which has never actually been identified. There are several contenders for the title in various locations.


Scientists trace Language back to a particular place on earth, the Bible would describe that place to be the mountains of Ararat in Turkey. The linguists agree!


No, they don't. Turkey is not a specific small location on and around a mountain. Turkey is a rather large country. And Babel was located in IRAQ -- not Turkey. So if we got all those 'mature languages' we wouldn't see languages of different ages and with different roots -- they'd all spring up with no precursors in one location in Iraq.

Here's a better web site on languages:
www.krysstal.com...
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 7 days ago with 14 member flags
I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags
What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags
Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
The World Is in Desperate Need of Heretics!
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags