It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spinalremain
Reply to post by beezzer
Incompetant leadership?
If you're referring to the president, it would be wise to at the very least present evidence as to his fault.
As of now, all the right's crying about Benghazi have not revealed one single piece of evidence which paints Obama as having done anything wrong. You're all searching and upset, but this is exactly like the birther stuff only there are 4 dead Americans.
Until you know that Obama had done something wrong, you shouldn't blame him for anything. Hating a man and always looking to implicate him sans evidence is nothing more than a witch hunt.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Originally posted by spinalremain
Reply to post by beezzer
Incompetant leadership?
If you're referring to the president, it would be wise to at the very least present evidence as to his fault.
As of now, all the right's crying about Benghazi have not revealed one single piece of evidence which paints Obama as having done anything wrong. You're all searching and upset, but this is exactly like the birther stuff only there are 4 dead Americans.
Until you know that Obama had done something wrong, you shouldn't blame him for anything. Hating a man and always looking to implicate him sans evidence is nothing more than a witch hunt.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
The Obfuscator In Chief implicates himself. There is no evidence? How do we get to that evidence??? This stinks to high heaven and you know it. Everything is rainbows and butterflies in Obamaland... BS
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
The General was set up as a punishment for threatening to tell the truth. If he speaks anymore of the truth he will be assassinated by Bill Clintons boys, The Presidents own hit squad. If I was Obama I would be watching my own back with most of the high ranking military and Secret Service boys really pissed off at me. The military needs to ass stomp these guys and set America back right.
Here is the Secret group exposed that has been enforcing the Presidents of the past and present. They are from every aspect of the services. I would not doubt it that these were some of the clowns that died that day in Libya.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
The General was set up as a punishment for threatening to tell the truth. If he speaks anymore of the truth he will be assassinated by Bill Clintons boys, The Presidents own hit squad.
Originally posted by Axial Leader
Is any of the above possible?
Originally posted by 11andrew34
Originally posted by Axial Leader
Is any of the above possible?
It reads like laughably ridiculous pro-Obama fan fiction where you try to pin all the blame on Petraeus.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Axial Leader
Besides, Obama could have called up any of Petraeus' deputies and said "This is the President. Do X, Y, and Z, and don't wait for your boss."
Originally posted by Axial Leader
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Axial Leader
Besides, Obama could have called up any of Petraeus' deputies and said "This is the President. Do X, Y, and Z, and don't wait for your boss."
Yup. That's true. Good point.
Maybe we will be learning more in the next week or two, and we can regroup under another thread to discuss this further.
The Deeper Questions Behind the Ambassador’s Murder … and the CIA Boss’ Sudden Resignation
While the GOP is attacking (and Dems defending) the Obama administration in connection with the murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, there is a deeper story.
Sure, it is stunning that the State Department never requested backup or that people such as Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer allege that President Obama personally watched in real time the attacks as they occurred via video feeds from drones flying over the Benghazi consulate.
But these claims only can be assessed – and the whole confusing mess only makes sense – if the deeper underlying story is first exposed.
Many Syrian Terrorists Come from Libya
The U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya’s Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists.
According to a 2007 report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi:
Al Qaeda is now largely in control of Libya. Indeed, Al Qaeda flags were flown over the Benghazi courthouse once Gaddafi was toppled.
(Incidentally, Gaddafi was on the verge of invading Benghazi in 2011, 4 years after the West Point report cited Benghazi as a hotbed of Al Qaeda terrorists. Gaddafi claimed – rightly it turns out – that Benghazi was an Al Qaeda stronghold and a main source of the Libyan rebellion. But NATO planes stopped him, and protected Benghazi.)
CNN, the Telegraph, the Washington Times, and many other mainstream sources confirm that Al Qaeda terrorists from Libya have since flooded into Syria to fight the Assad regime.
Originally posted by chapterhouse
Im going to say it straight up fools. 1st was a consulute not a embassy. not an ambassetor but a cia agent w alot around him . only 2 killed worked for usa other 2 were 2 ex navy seals that just happened to show up and help out,on contact to someone else. they managed to kill over 60 attackers before a mortar took them out and they save over 20. there were over 150 attackers and there sure wasnt ever a protest. you people are pissing me off with your stupidity. and striaght up you fools that dibunking anrt going to win anything by being the fool.