USA's Very Own UFO

page: 1
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:33 AM
link   
Veterans Today has just posted a story and a video regarding the top secret TRC3 Spacecraft:



Veterans Today, working with Ricardo Baretzky, Operational Director of the Counter Intelligence Agency Asian desk has cracked NASA’s encryption block.
The craft shown above and in the video, we are informed, is in Australia without government approval. They don’t even know it is there.
This is an armed military craft, US Department of Defense, capable of use against any potential target on earth. Sources indicate that this craft has been used against “targets.”
There have been reports of unusual drone attacks in Pakistan and Afghanistan where victims have dissolved or are found with their bodies in a “rubberized” state.
These are confirmed






Now this story of a global security threat, is about to unfold. Ricardo Baretzky, one of the world leading global security threat analyst and specialist has taken the daunting task to once and for all provide that analytical proof that there was indeed some kind of global cover-up and not the imaginations of man but rather a fact of existence.


I would have embedded the video, however written permission is needed. You can click on the "source" read the article and watch the video. What do you guys think?

Source
edit on 9-11-2012 by 1questioner because: because




posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:37 AM
link   
reply to post by 1questioner
 


UFO = Unidentifiable Flying Object

So it's just a FO.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:46 AM
link   
reply to post by 1questioner
 


That looks like a group of antennas on the ground to me. That's not an aircraft. If it was then Google Earth would have erased it, like they always do at gov't request.

I love how these are supposed to be ultra black projects, but people know everything about them.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:47 AM
link   
Almost looks like a large radio transmission tower with it's three guy wires and anchors from overhead .



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:48 AM
link   
reply to post by 1questioner
 
Should we trust Gordon Duff with stories like these??? Dunno but here is some more scoop on Duff. Treat everything warily, people.
Is Gordon Duff Disinfo?



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   
Identifying something as "un-identified"...after you IDENTIFY it... AND who owns it...is an oxy-moron.

FYI: UFOs dont always mean "flying saucers from Outer-Inner space"...they are only 1-Flying, and 2-Unidentified...
and "ALIENS" could mean my Neighbors from Pakistan...LEGAL aliens.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   
Gordon Duff has experience and heavy duty contacts. His stories and sources should not be dismissed easily.

Bio



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:06 PM
link   
I believe there is such a craft, and also those "strange" drone attacks seem plausible. 1903 - 2012 and no significant breakthru in aviation? You got to be kiddin me jack!



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by hesse
 


There have been huge breakthroughs in aviation in that time.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Jaellma
 


I listened to your linked interview clip of Gordon Duff, and I believe everything we read and hear must be questioned. That's why I created this thread. Let's get this information out there and have a discussion.

Does the U.S. have this kind of technology or not? If we don't have this kind of technology, what is your proof other than you haven't seen it with your own eyes or the U.S. hasn't admitted it? If we do have this kind of technology, what else do we have? Also, when will this technology ever be used to help people and not kill them?



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:15 PM
link   
reply to post by 1questioner
 


If we do have this, where is the evidence other than some bad pictures, misidentified Google Earth images, and hearsay?



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


Thats is a matter of opinion. Im pretty sure that advanced anti grav tech is being hidden from the public. Possibly since the 40/50ies.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by hesse
 


How can you say that it's a matter of opinion when in 50 years we went from first flight, to sustained Mach 3+? How is that NOT a major breakthrough?



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:37 PM
link   
I am reading the SS brotherhood of the bell by Joseph P. Farrell.I really think he is on to something.
Even if it´s not as dramatic, as in his book, I still believe there has to be at least a little truth in there. So that would still make the breakthroughs bigger, than the ones we are privy to witness.

BTW - I don´t base any of my opinion on those pics the OP posted. Im just saying "it´s possible", in my book.

edit on 9-11-2012 by hesse because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by 1questioner
 
There are many articles written about the TRC3 prototype and its predecessor, the TR-3B but we don't have proof, just evidence. The real proof is locked away tight from the general public.

Here is some additional information about the older model, TR3B

I keep hearing plasma weaponry and it brings up memories of a thread someone had started on ATS about an old plasma weapon. Old technology but still very scary, by today's standards: The Shiva Star.

So yeah, I strongly believe the US and other developed nations, have advanced weaponry, as mentioned previously on this thread and what Duff and company are alluding to.

How we get more information on them and their capabilities is a whole 'nother set of questions.

edit on 9-11-2012 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Jaellma
 


Why does the designation change? That makes absolutely no sense. Either it's the TR3C, or the earlier model is the TRB3. Although neither of those designations makes sense if it's supposed to be a bomber of some sort. The TR designation denotes a tactical reconnaissance aircraft. They don't just randomly throw letters together to get designations, they actually stand for something.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 01:56 PM
link   
Bottom line is Gordon Duff lies about everything...well about 40% of what he says is false...

theuglytruth.wordpress.com...



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:13 AM
link   
Interesting find. People won't believe what I say and I don't know about the photos and video, but the "mercury/plasma drive" is real enough. Not exactly what I'd call it, but that's close enough. I shared about a year ago here that I worked on something similar to the fabled "foo fighters" but only as consultant. It works in a couple different ways, there's a gyro-like central structure to it composed of the superconductive material. "Mercury" is important in the design but not in the form you and I most commonly think of it as. It's part of the heated material itself. On the outer areas of the "drive," there are tubes. 3 for most basic function that are horizontal. One flowing the charged gas one direction, the next, larger tube pushing it the opposite direction. These hoops themselves also have smaller "hoops" of charged plasma that are arrayed around them. Like a wedding ring with tinier wedding rings all around the circle of it. A tesla coil but with plasma.. in a way. Anyways, the opposite flowing plasma (of the same charge) has the effect of "push," seemingly breaking a law of known physics.. but, well, it just works. The gyroscopic interior more of less does what you'd imagine it might, while also providing lift enough to counter balance. There's more, but this is roughly what the "drive" is. Placed in a straight line if the aerial is long, or on the corners of any shape (or just making one big "Drive" as the craft itself like in the earlier models) all work to sustain lift. There's a bit of an issue with the gas and heat that's let loose but every engine has that problem.

The aerial vehicle, when the outer shell electrical field is turned (same as used by the stealth craft) on creates a kind of mild "glow" around the edges of it's field. Like a pair of sunglasses, clear when you look through them but turn more opaque when seen from an angle. It's the same old "green glow" written about from the supposed "philly experiments" around the boat, but not to the same dangerous degree.

It's really cool to see some of this come out to light. I have a very good idea why, if the reports are true, that this was spotted down in Australia as opposed to being based here, and it's not for the general reason of escaping from prying eyes. Has to do with manufacturing.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by boomer135
Bottom line is Gordon Duff lies about everything...well about 40% of what he says is false...

theuglytruth.wordpress.com...


I was careful not to say that, but you pointed it out anyways. I do wonder about the validity of his visual evidence.

Those claims he makes about the bodies.. that comes more from ultrasonic, ion, or microwave reactions to the human form. Not some crazy plasma weapon. Army does field tests all the time, why does it have to be "ufos?"
edit on 10-11-2012 by SoulVisions because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:29 AM
link   
A nuclear powered anti-gravity spaceship dissolving people with energy weapons, have I got that right? LOL.

Maybe in Star Trek not too sure about actual reality. The SR-91 Aurora probably exists, this thing I don't think so.

Soulvisions I'm sure there are a lot of experimental concepts and designs being worked on but this story is a bit ridiculous. By the way what's the energy source for the thing in your post?





new topics
 
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join