It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by phroziac
Because that is not proper english; why bother beating it into your head for 12 years if it doesn't even matter in the 'grown up world'? I seriously think that people are brainwashed; and this scenario augments that belief. If the Government, Established Mainstream Story theory ever gets contradicted; people take the rebuttal of the 'Mainstream' opposed to hearing both sides. Most of you should also know that there are things detrimental to TTPB, and will not be found on simple Google searches.
Ummm.....They also classify returning vets, anyone who doesn't care to be felt up by TSA, fiscal or moral conservatives, Constitutionalists, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum as domestic terrorists. Do you make a point of telling the cross stich country clatch that they're domestic terrorists as well? How about Vets, it's Veterans day wkend, are you going to declare us all domestic terrorists? Who gives a flying spit about the FBI's terror list, I'm sure YOUR on it just like everybody else in the country. Their criteria sheet is so broad brushing that it includes every stripe of the political rainbow.....It's all a joke, just not a funny funny, ha ha.
Originally posted by Hefficide
It is my custom to enter threads on this topic and post a reminder... The FBI classifies "sovereign citizens" as domestic terrorists.
My research has yet to show me a single American citizen who has accomplished much of anything positive by following these ideas. Many swear they've been let out of traffic stops or even beaten a ticket using these tactics. But, beyond that....
Quite a high risk to take to avoid a speeding fine IMO.
Originally posted by six67seven
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by daddio
That all makes sense, but I don't understand why anyone would need a fully automatic machine gun? That's the only part I don't get. There are a lot of very dumb and very crazy people in the states and they shouldn't have access to fully automatic weapons.
It could be just a few short years before you understand why anyone would need a fully automatic machine gun.
Now, most gun owners do not own fully automatic machine guns, its very atypical.
Regarding your 'lot of dumb and very crazy people in the states' comment... maybe we should restrict their access to voting boothes.... see what I did there?
Originally posted by IsawWHATtheyDID
the whole ucc filing thing is a trap. if someone wants to free themselves, why would they try and gain one of the instruments of control [money] ? our consent is what binds us to tyranny. write up a affidavit of truth, withdraw all powers of attorney that were either obtained fraudulently, or without full disclosure and understanding. withdraw all given or implied consent that you allowed by either fraud or lack of full disclosure and understanding. TPTBs biggest fear is "WE THE PEOPLE" losing fear and gaining knowledge. they can stack the deck against you all they want, but if you dont play their game, it wont make a difference.
Originally posted by Dynamike
No one told me to agree with the principles that our country was built on. I learned to appreciate them after traveling to other countries and learning of how governments operated in world history. Do I agree with all of the countries laws and ideals? Absolutely not. I dont agree with many of the laws governing insurance, welfare, social security, commerce, gun control, and drug control to name a few.
I wouldnt consider myself patriotic. I am very passive and neutral with all things. I keep an open mind and consider arguments when presented no matter how absurd they are.
That being said I found your argument to lack substance. You have no definition of what you disagree with like what I listed above. You say you are not free but dont give any credence to your argument. You downright oppose law without listing any alternative measure or reason for doing so. Based on that information I perceive your belief system as this:
You are an anarchist. You oppose laws just because they place barriers on what you can do without realizing what they also protect you from. If the country were ran how you wanted it to it would be a much different place. There would be no policing. If police had no power to stop or identify people then they could not develop probable cause for arrest. Therefore the 40% of Americans who depend on government hand outs such as food and shelter will be next looking for people that have earned those things on their own. They will rob, steal, and kill to get what they want because that is the nature of humans. This would happen because the government could no longer tax its people. Without income all government positions would be lost and therefore no government to control the people.
After this occurs there would be an invasion, most likely by China. They would take control of the country and establish their own government. At first there would be extreme measures. People would die in a power struggle. But that would soon be lost as the Chinese government took control over US military bases. The Chinese people would restore order in their way- Communism. Under Communism you would see what freedom really is.
Again; are you completely free? No. There are laws that dictate how everyone should behave. If you dont appreciate that then you can try to live in another country or in the wild and find out which you prefer. Its that simple.
The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:
"The Constitution for the united states of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.