More footage of UFOs over Denver. Baffles aviation experts.

page: 11
207
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:15 PM
link   
i am still rolling at a comment i seen on the video page, (this is what happens when it was legalized). ok enough of that, very interesting to say the least. i guess when i go back out to Colorado i will be looking at the sky a lil more and see if i can see any thing




posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:29 PM
link   
My impression is that they look like insects moving at high speed close to the lens to me, rather than larger objects moving at high speeds further away in the sky. But if photographic and aviation experts with sufficient experience and expertise have analyzed the footage and are baffled, then I am open to alternative explanations. That's just what they look like to my eyes.

My two cents. Peace.



posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 11:34 PM
link   
Pathetic video. The shots of the object are short and clipped and it looks like it is moving around erratically and too fast. And 133 flags so far? Even more pathetic.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrInquisitive
Pathetic video. The shots of the object are short and clipped and it looks like it is moving around erratically and too fast. And 133 flags so far? Even more pathetic.


It is not the quality of video that is of interest here. It is the depth of field, corroboration, and experts that analyzed whatever it was. The simple explainations have been taken out already. It is interesting.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrInquisitive
Pathetic video. The shots of the object are short and clipped and it looks like it is moving around erratically and too fast. And 133 flags so far? Even more pathetic.


Too fast? I'm sorry, but do you know exactly how fast UFO's drive? I'm just asking since you're implying it is too fast to be one...

Please do enlighten me!



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:18 AM
link   
Some food for thought....

56th and Clay is aprox. 800 yards away from Lake Sangraco



 
LINK

Lake Sangraco is actually a reservoir and was created 10/13/1978. The lake was previously a gravel pit.
Sangraco is almost entirely surrounded by trees.


Summary

Description

English: The Brannan Sand and Gravel Pit No. 8-Lake Sangraco Boathouse Complex, located in Adams County, Colorado. The small lake is Lake Sangraco, and that name is an acronym of "Sand and Gravel Company." The property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The small lake is Lake Sangraco, and that name is an acronym of "Sand and Gravel Company."


2nd LINK


Brannan Sand and Gravel Pit No. 8-Lake Sangraco Boathouse Complex

So this "complex" was added to the National Register of Historic Places on Aug. 16, 2011, making it the newest addition in Adams Co.

The problem I am having is that I cant find any of the formal paperwork that would have been submitt to the Dept. of the Interior / National Parks Service. I do have the serial number from the registry - (NRHP's website is down while I am doing this, of course, I will update the number later). The address of the buildings are "restricted," however it is visible from about 60th and Lowell Blvd. or from the southeast side of Jim Baker Reservoir in Westminster / Unincorporated Adams County, Colorado.


dX
edit on 10-11-2012 by HumanoidX because: typos



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:19 AM
link   
Insects. Looks too blotchy and up close, definitely not far off in the sky. Way better videos out there, this ones weak.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:21 AM
link   
Denver is the new US Capitol.
It's replacing DC after the pole shift causes tsunami's that wipe out the eastern seaboard.
That's not a UFO.
That's Air Force 1.1



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:21 AM
link   
I just find it VERY hard to believe that a news crew showed up, interviewed this guy, shot their own footage, and contacted a specialist because NONE OF THEM NOTICED BUGS FLYING AROUND. I mean come on. I understand how erratic movement and blurry images can point to that, but these people, the video journalist especially, almost certainly knows the difference between a UFO and a horse fly.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by spire

Originally posted by MrInquisitive
Pathetic video. The shots of the object are short and clipped and it looks like it is moving around erratically and too fast. And 133 flags so far? Even more pathetic.


Too fast? I'm sorry, but do you know exactly how fast UFO's drive? I'm just asking since you're implying it is too fast to be one...

Please do enlighten me!


It looks like a bug flying around. I said erratic and too fast. No doubt advanced, ET craft could move fast and possibly even minimize/nullify inertia, but what was on the video looked tres hinky. And landing and taking off multiple times in Denver proper? Right. It's you wannabelievers that are looking silly here, defending this claimed sighting.
edit on 10-11-2012 by MrInquisitive because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:37 AM
link   
it's small bits of trash...certainly is debris.... meh...case closed
I could reproduce this vid on any windy day



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 12:58 AM
link   
reply to post by imitator
 


Brilliant! Simply ......brilliant!

Thread closed.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:11 AM
link   
I'm shocked that nobody gets it. This is real. Aliens are Colorado's first

"marijuana tourists".

Previously they had to claim "anxiety" to get a doctor's recommendation.
Since Prop 64 has passed, maybe this now makes them..."legal" aliens?


---

Seriously though, my initial impressions are that it is quite terrestrial, low to the ground and probably easily explainable. Bags, bugs, birds, RC...the truth is likely in one of these.
edit on 10-11-2012 by AnnunakiX because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:11 AM
link   
reply to post by ilikestarz
 



I really don't understand why he was there filming into the sky?

It's as if he knew where and when to look.

And to top it off, he most likely didn't even see it with his eyes? Yet he knew where to point the camera?

Those indestructible drones/ or RC copters must cost a fortune.. I have a drone and a mid level copter and can guarantee you even if It didn't fly apart from the force I would simply wreck it.Have trouble flying when I can see.
I say this because the claim is its moving to fast to see..How could you possibly control it then??That's stupid..


Insect theory is not much better....Don't Insects die off in cold weather?Whats the elevation=cold

Also, If the objects are flying into and launching from a developed area, maybe they are entering into a body of water?
Are the shills here yet looking all sweaty(:
edit on 10-11-2012 by flimzytrek because: trek



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:39 AM
link   
I still dont get it. If it's insects, why are the crews only finding them around lunchtime?


Do they take a lunch break and go for a lunchtime fly?

If it were insects you should see them for more than just that time of day and probably see many more of them as well.

Interesting vid, but im leaning towards a man made device



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:42 AM
link   
Must be the greys looking to smoke now that it's legal in the Mile High City


Pretty awesome video though, I hope someone who does it for a living can analyze it.
edit on 10-11-2012 by Destiny Of Souls because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:52 AM
link   
reply to post by FlySolo
 


Thjis one right here.
A Dutch artists whose pet cat died after being run over by a car, ...
www.wotshappening.com... sorry slightly off topic and strange

edit on 10-11-2012 by 12voltz because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:53 AM
link   
To everyone who keeps discounting bugs because these only show up at a certain time of day, the most logical explanation is that these show up all day but they happened to show up at 1 because that's when Fox were filming. As for the guy, maybe he was seeing something else at 1 every day or he is simply lying and/or mistaken.

As to how the news and aviation experts could be baffled, that also has a simple explanation. The media will do anything for ratings, and this is Fox after all, great investigation is not their strong point. Aviation experts are no better than you or I at spotting bugs on a camera, either, so stop takin their word as gospel. Lastly, if they truly ruled out bugs they would tell us how and on what basis, and I am guessing they would be using faulty reasoning like many of you here.

This is very likely to be bugs, and no amount of hand waving and mocking is going to change that.



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 01:56 AM
link   
One final discrepancy I noticed. Fox say these things are too fast to see with the naked eye, but I believe the original guy who reported them did claim to have seen them with his naked eye, which is what makes me think they're looking at completely different things here.

Otherwise, we are supposed to believe he just routinely video tapes the sky at a certain time of day for no reason?



posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 02:00 AM
link   
Even the truth becomes a lie once it has been reported by fox.





 
207
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join