It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did the suppression or lack of voter ID laws aid President Obama’s victory over Mitt Romney? Obama did not win a single state that requires photo IDs to vote, although he was victorious in four states that require non-photo identification – Washington, Colorado, Ohio and Virginia. Those states accept as legitimate identification current utility bills, bank statements and paychecks.
Obama won several closely contested states that do not require any voter identification, including Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Wisconsin and Nevada...
Originally posted by Hydrawolf
So i guess the question is - Did the lack of voter ID laws in the US contribute to President Obama's victory over Mitt Romney?
Or was President Obama's victory an honest one without any doubt?
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
It doesn't matter. The popular vote doesn't determine the election anyway. It's a "feel-good" measure, letting the citizens vote. If you're talking about the electoral vote, those electoral voters are, so to speak, already vetted and may or may not require photo ID. It's a moot point.
The entire thing's a huge scam in any case. We have no control over who becomes president. We're presented with two candidates hand-picked by the criminal cabal, and it makes no difference which one spends the next 4 years carrying out the destruction of the US and its constitution. Voter ID is just another way to divide us so that we're easier to control....