Dr. Semir Osmanagich Regarding Pyramids Found All Over the World

page: 11
53
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 02:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Hanslune
 


In the submitted UVG worldgrid simulations only the Google Earth KML " pyramids overlay" of Megalithic Portal is used. The Australian pyramid is not yet registered there , but Gympie town is on vector of the standard UVG (UVG everywhere on internet) , the town seems even on track in the Bosnian Pyramids UVG simulation ?!. The surrealistic is that pentagonal worldgrids (dodecas and deducted vectors) seems , hypothetical, to have been used from major archeological centers to map the world , often they take
the same pyramids in their vectors. I only register the facts using the UVG simulator , asked many people for a possible geometric explanation, but honestly its a mystery.
Unfortunately the coordinates of the Australian pyramid are not on internet.
Remark : UVG simulations often show that ancients stone circles and sacred mountains (or caves) are on track (vector).
The remarkable simulation i mentioned on this forum is on a position at the foot of the Himalayas, aligned northpole and links Ur Mesopotamia , Gran Canaria Guimar pyramids , Tiwanaku in absolute acceptable precision in UVG mathematical triangles. The positioning results from an ancient gran circles decision table from Gizeh, discovered by Geolines Rusia: see the webpage concerned :

Stonehenge is directly linked over that magic crossing point in Bangladesh (antipodal before the Inca coasts), linked to, with an absolute precision: Uluru , the most sacred mountain or rock of the Australian Aboriginals?! distance : 15.115,47km !!!

I will ask the exact coordinates of the Gympie pyramid today to the project leaders there :

www.gympiepyramid.org...




posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 05:13 AM
link   
reply to post by kennes
 


Thanks for your post!



Originally posted by kennes
users.telenet.be...

is an interactive online worldgrid simulation
in Google Earth of an UVG grid (Platonic pentagonal or dodeca worldgrid with associated vectors) :
all major pyramids worldwide are in a few gran circles linked together in UVG simulation mode.


Please forgive me if this is a dumb question. (I'm new at this.) What is a gran circle?

edit on 11/28/12 by Mary Rose because: Add



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 07:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by bowtomonkey
2. That the voracity of the discoveries are important enough to the expansion of human consciousness for them to be involved.


Originally posted by Mary Rose
Voracity? (Veracity?)


Did you intend to say "voracity" or did you mean to say "veracity" in your statement?



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 08:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 


UVG gran circle :

Practical definition of Prof. Hagens , USA, given on the worldgrids comparisons website of Dan Shaw :

www.vortexmaps.com... : Prof. Hagens :

"Every line of an UVG is part of a great circle (equator) that divides the sphere of Earth in half. This is the major change that Bill Becker and I made to the “planetary grid’ model (shown here) proposed in the 1970s by three Russian men Makarov (an engineer), Morozov (a linguist), and Goncharov (a historian). "

Website Prof. Hagens : missionignition.net...

I'm myself not a mathematician, geometer or astronomer, i practically merged Google Earth overlays or KML definition metafiles : example the standard UVG KML with the pyramids position and description overlay (KML) , both available on internet and my sources each time mentioned on my webpages.

This gives shocking correlations and results : example :

UVGs and UFO position and appearance overlays (KML for Google Earth) by year
UVGs and most sacred sites of all religions (also sacred caves)
UVGs + most sacred mountains of China + worldwide stone circles by regions of countries
Uvgs and satellite discovered underwater sites like the controversial Google Atlantis/c grid
.........

The separate KMLs can be toggled on and off in Google earth to see for example which UVG simulations,
starting from major archeological sites , go throught the same pyramids :

example : the standard Gizeh UVG has a 3 vector crossing in town of Jumpie. in Australia , and the Bosnian Pyramid of the Moon UVG has one vector going through also (multi-UVGs pyramid position, enigma today)

There is however one big problem : treasure hunters are actually using those results put on the net
and follow in Google Earth and Gps the new sites, stolen before an archeolog is informed , worse, the archeologs even ignore the hobbyist findings in most cases lack of budgets or because very controversial historicly.

Satellite Discoveries closed his KMLs for that reason , and i was asked to not use them anymore in my online simulations combined with UVGs vectoring on them (except a few one as example in deep waters)

From the other side Google seems ( i don't believe this) to hide, or zooming halfout, some historicly controversial sites , very deep, underwater on which valid UVG simulations , very hypotheticly, may apply. See many Google Atlantis/c grid articles on the net :

Big controverses, example dailymail : www.dailymail.co.uk...

Valid simulation on middle Google Atlantis Grid in UVG is however possible taking onland pyramids worldwide : very very hypothetical (I contacted worldknown specialist seen the depth of the grid , if true this is in the range of 100.000s BC., and then following a very big cataclysm perhaps ) : so :

"Atlantis" interactive online alignment northpole : many worldwide pyramids in vectors :

users.telenet.be...

Only the Theosophical Movement has maps going so far back in history ...:

www.sacred-texts.com... ( 4 maps over large BC periods) ....

The most unbelieavable however is that this Google Earth Atlantis/c grid is also in place in the Atlantic pentagram of the standard UVG of Gizeh. More, this UVG is practical the same as the Adams Calendar UVG simulation on Mpumalanga stone circles at South Africa, 200.000 bc ?!

Adams Orion Calendar UVG Interactive online , taking also the African stone circles of Namoratunga and Nabta :

users.telenet.be...

(i'm afraid i may have some questions to answer ...)



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by kennes
 


Very interesting information. I studied the grid for a while, I did not go indepth with the studies though. I also know that there are a lot of people out there that will destroy an ancient site just to make profits making it impossible to find the truth about these things. I understand why Archeologists deny some things, letting out all their knowledge of these unprotected sites would cause their destruction because they cannot be protected. It is better to deny the existance of something sometimes to protect it. I have a couple of areas I have found in my life that have things that need to be protected from greed. I will take the location of these places to the grave with me if I cannot find a suitable person to leave this knowledge with. Sometimes protecting something means not letting others know where it is, even your family.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 11:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by kennes
 


I understand why Archeologists deny some things, letting out all their knowledge of these unprotected sites would cause their destruction because they cannot be protected. It is better to deny the existance of something sometimes to protect it.


BS, Rickymouse? You can easily protect a site and still acknowledge that it is exist, it properties, finds from it, you can publish reports on it and still keep it safe but not giving out its exact location, that has been done many times........



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 11:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by kennes
reply to post by Mary Rose
 


UVG gran circle :

Practical definition of Prof. Hagens , USA, given on the worldgrids comparisons website of Dan Shaw :

www.vortexmaps.com... : Prof. Hagens :

"Every line of an UVG is part of a great circle (equator) that divides the sphere of Earth in half. . . .


Are you saying that the "gran circle" is the same thing as a "great circle/equator"?



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 12:03 PM
link   
reply to post by rickymouse
 


That is very interesting.

It makes me think of things like the United Nations seemingly being an organization to promote world peace, when in reality, it is a front for the New World Order agenda. Things like "Agenda 21" are a pretext for a land-grab by the powers that be. Local governments in the United States are rubber-stamping Agenda 21 initiatives.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 03:15 PM
link   
An analysis and look at the National Geographic documentary on the hills of Visoko

Visoko hills a tale of Osmie's imagination

I'll post a number of items from this article as it is a good review of the geological evidence against Osmie and his desperate attempts to 'make it go away'



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 


Veracity. Importance. Pertinence.

Let me apologize in advance for my writing skills.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by bowtomonkey
 


I'm just trying to understand the point you were making about the Bosnian war.

I used the term "powers that be" to mean the elitist controllers of the planet and it sounded to me that you were using the term to indicate something or some group doing things that were necessary.

"Voracity" would have meant greediness; "veracity," truthfulness.

Anyway, then you said the powers that be is Mother Nature, or the laws of nature. Correct?

(I'm not trying to beat a dead horse.
)



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 07:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by bowtomonkey
 


I'm just trying to understand the point you were making about the Bosnian war.

I used the term "powers that be" to mean the elitist controllers of the planet and it sounded to me that you were using the term to indicate something or some group doing things that were necessary.

"Voracity" would have meant greediness; "veracity," truthfulness.

Anyway, then you said the powers that be is Mother Nature, or the laws of nature. Correct?

(I'm not trying to beat a dead horse.
)


Thanks for the correction.

The main difference we have is because TBTB is a mixed up term defining any powerful entity. From my point of view there is some confusion because of an us v them mentality whereby people wrongly assume that any power is an evil thing threatening to control them.

If I'm not mistaken, most people refer to an unknown oligarchy when referring to TBTP, or otherwise they refer to the illuminate, and perhaps the UN in general, or any thing that wants to be central in a NWO. This is a wide distinction.

Where we part is where I don't assume TPTB are bad. I have faith in a good outcome. I believe there are more people working for the good of mankind than against it and the most powerful of these have no harmful or self interested intent, ever...

I note that propaganda is self interested and it's hard to ignore it these days. I tend to believe that TPTB are far more powerful than we expect and that we are the bad guys, not them. I say this as one more person who puts himself before others, yet what would a selfless all-powerful being do to help someone who highest hopes lead to more misery.

Still confused?

That's why I said TPTB is nature itself. People and groups with selfish interests can only estrange themselves from reality itself. I didn't mean to imply the general term TPTB (the so called "evil powers") are responsible, however I'm quite sure that better people than you and me fall under that same TPTB umbrella term.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by bowtomonkey
 


I think we're all self-interested, and should be. That's our job - take care of ourselves, without hurting others in the process.

The only thing that is wrong with "us" - the masses - vs. "them" - the controllers is that collectively we've allowed ourselves to either be controlled out of timidness or lack of knowledge, or to be minions for the sake of prestige or materialism.

I am also hopeful, because I see the masses waking up. In my opinion, people like Osmanagich are helping us do it.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 


I see it more so that the people you refer to have chance on their side, and that they fill a vacuum which we create through our greed.

As far as waking up is concerned the end result would necessarily be selflessness.

What we are seeing now is pressure to be selfish and see the world as separate to our concept of self. When you say "we should be like that" you already allude to a greater whole (a semi self conscious unit). To wake up does not mean we will close the loopholes. We can only go the next step by looking out for each other, so one way or another that's is what will have happened should we succeed.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by bowtomonkey
I see it more so that the people you refer to have chance on their side, and that they fill a vacuum which we create through our greed.


Which people I refer to?

(This is called a failure to communicate.
)



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 





the controllers is that collectively we've allowed ourselves to either be controlled out of timidness or lack of knowledge, or to be minions for the sake of prestige or materialism.


The controllers



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mary Rose
I used the term "powers that be" to mean the elitist controllers of the planet and it sounded to me that you were using the term to indicate something or some group doing things that were necessary.


The problem with that is there are no "controllers of the planet," only would-be controllers of the planet.

The truth is, no one at all is "in control." I recognize that it is a far more comfortable position to believe in these "controllers of the planet" than it is to see that no one is in control. The latter is a much scarier reality, so hiding in a mindset of the world being "controlled" is less frightening and thus a common refuge for those too cowardly to even momentarily ponder the reality of the situation.

Harte



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 09:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 


How do we create controllers through our greed?



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mary Rose

I am also hopeful, because I see the masses waking up. In my opinion, people like Osmanagich are helping us do it.


Helping in what way? Making stuff up isn't usually considered helpful unless you mean it as a matter of entertainment?



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Harte

Originally posted by Mary Rose
I used the term "powers that be" to mean the elitist controllers of the planet and it sounded to me that you were using the term to indicate something or some group doing things that were necessary.


The problem with that is there are no "controllers of the planet," only would-be controllers of the planet.

The truth is, no one at all is "in control." I recognize that it is a far more comfortable position to believe in these "controllers of the planet" than it is to see that no one is in control. The latter is a much scarier reality, so hiding in a mindset of the world being "controlled" is less frightening and thus a common refuge for those too cowardly to even momentarily ponder the reality of the situation.

Harte


Our world is run by 'zillions' of 'committees' made up of people who don't agree with each other, all with their own agendas and bias - we do remarkably well dispite this handicap





new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join