Originally posted by fourthmeal
I can't tell you why people don't use it but from what I read, it is accurate.
Electrical Engineers are a strange bunch. I know a lot of EE's, and some are real assholes who think they are the expert of every field of electronics, and can't be talked to about it. For instance, talking with them about speakers and using unique coil designs like XBL^2, or an LMS coil... or heaven forbid something else new. Yet the Klippel measuring machine proves these technologies out. Only a select few builders of speakers bother with these latest ideas, but they are proven to work.
I see RS in a similar bind. No funding, goes against traditional science, really operating like Galileo or Kozyrev on the fringe, but yet the math works out and the system resolves out just fine, and with a grace that quantum mechanics simply can't match. Tesla fought the mainstream and in some ways lost, other ways totally kicked it out of the park. Each discovery has its day though. Hell, I don't see many Tesla turbines running yet they are efficient, simple, and really great designs.
People talking about dark energy and dark mass... really? Sounds like making stuff up to me.
Larsonian physics may get retribution once a few more secrets are spilt at the high levels of government. Might be a while but who knows. Things are changing quickly these days.
TIMELESS COMMENTS ON TIMELINES: Head Scratching Over the Daniel Papers
by GW Hardin
As a New York Times bestselling author, I often get to see a lot of things others don’t. Because of that I feel the need to bring in additional material to the “Daniel” papers. Reading the Daniel papers is like the trying to drink water from a fire hose. So I will limit my comments in this first response in the name of sanity as well as brevity. Depending on the reaction to this balancing act with Daniel, I may provide follow-up white papers.
In brief, I will address three areas of partial imbalance in the Daniel papers:
1. Humanity as Sons of Slaves or Sons of God ... based on his comments in his paper on “The Uncommitted Investigator.”
2. The Return to Timeline Zero (the “natural” timeline) as Opposed to the Ascension into Timeline Three ... based on his writings in “Time and Timelines.”
3. “The Cavalry is Coming” Versus the David-and-Goliath Complex.
But the Postulates of this work specify that each unit of space is equivalent to a unit of time and since the motion involves two different units of space the equivalent units of time are also two separate and distinct units. Therefore when the photons increase their separation by two units of space they also increase their separation by two units of time; that is it takes two units of time to move the photons apart two units in space. The relative velocity is then 2/2 = 1, which is completely in agreement with the observed facts.
Now let's consider the case of two material objects approaching one another at relativistic speeds. Each is travelling at 3/4 the speed of light. They are separated by one unit of space. They meet each other after 3/8 of a unit of time, which is less than the one unit of time it would take for light to traverse that distance. Or am I missing something?
I am deeply sorry ... but this is the place where my knowledge of physics pretty much ends ... would be good to have an expert directly answer that.
It is your lack of knowledge that allows you to take Lawson and his silly "theory" seriously. The fact that "Daniel" established his credentials by citing known hoaxes, then uses a crackpot Theory Of Everything should tell you everything you need to know about the "Daniel Papers." [HOAX]
Originally posted by consolution
I think you are a little too fast with your judgement. At least for me.
I'd like to discuss these topics and get your opinion on it.
Originally posted by daskakik
The thing that I would point out is that in his second book "Far Away Journeys", he claims to have been given information about the beginning of man. Quick answer according to Monroe is, earth and everything on it was created to condense and harvest a type of energy by "someone".
He actually uses the word "someone" instead of a name which leaves everyone basing their ideas on this able to put in Jehovah, the Orion Queen, the Annunaki or whatever they like. The problem with theories like Daniel's is that man was created to this end. It couldn't be a different timeline than "Timeline 0" because it was controlled by aliens since the start, it belonged to "someone" from the start.
Originally posted by delusion
I think I get that you mean that Daniel's work uses Monroe's as a reference, but it is then inconsistant with it, not that Monroe's is fact
Originally posted by daskakik
In the case of RS one thing must be kept in mind, this is a theory which also explains the material world. This means that, just like other physics experiments, they should be repeatable by anyone anywhere. You don't need fancy equipment to drop two objects with different mass and see that they fall at the same rate. You could search online for physics experiments for children and find hundreds. If RS has merit then there should also be explanations according to that system of these observations.
... The explanation of photons moving apart at the speed of light being two units apart after one unit of time doesn't really go against the theory of relativity. I'm not sure why this is offered as proof of it being wrong.
I'd like add: If you go to soldierhugs there is a Q&A comments section at the bottom, where Daniel is nicely responding to each question, up until the Nov 14th questions of course, because he probably hasn't been through them yet. (as of Nov 14th 3:15PST) I picked up great additional info there.
Well.. there's tiny thing I'd like to know... regarding Montauk... so apparently the scientists involved in the Montauk experiment all had their memories wiped out... did daniel go through that as well? if yes.. how did he recover..?
A: I did not have my memory wiped--well, at least I don't remember if I did! I was a part-time subcontractor, not an employee. I wasn't there the week the project closed. Most of the subcontractors were hired by local management, so when their minds got wiped, knowledge of who we were went with them! The base kept no records of us, other than our authorizations at the gate.
Q: The other thing is if he's had contact with Preston Nichols and aware of the new projects he's working on?
A: I have stayed clear of any of the surviving Montauk bigshots, Particularly my old boss, Nichols. Or as we used to refer to him when he wasn't around, the "Brookhaven Blimp." I don't know what he is like these days, but he had quite the ego back then. He was the technical engineer, working with the radio equipment