It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spiritualzombie
reply to post by ararisq
This argument is nothing more than financial terrorism from the right. Such slime, they are.
Originally posted by votan
actually that is inaccurate. Those salaries will serve to compensate for any monetary hits that will be taken by investors and top positions. The top cannot be touched but lower tiers can be downsized and have their wages cut. You will be asked to do more with less.
The business will not suffer, the employees will. The retaliation of the so called "rich"
will be to take it out on the people. You tax them more and they will just take more from the people to compensate. they do not lose out at all just the middle guy gets screwed.
Originally posted by ararisq
I work for a company that has been on a hiring spree all year, adding 50+ jobs this year alone. Today, I got the call that my staff is being cut by over 75%. I have no idea how we'll be able to deliver our work next year, it just seems impossible.
I've heard some other anecdotal evidence that people are losing their jobs all across the company as businesses allocate what used to be salary to future taxes.
Originally posted by ararisq
Originally posted by votan
actually that is inaccurate. Those salaries will serve to compensate for any monetary hits that will be taken by investors and top positions. The top cannot be touched but lower tiers can be downsized and have their wages cut. You will be asked to do more with less.
The business will not suffer, the employees will. The retaliation of the so called "rich"
will be to take it out on the people. You tax them more and they will just take more from the people to compensate. they do not lose out at all just the middle guy gets screwed.
You live in a dream world. The people at the top of my company work harder and longer than anyone because its their company, and largely their investment. This comic book idea that all of the owners of small businesses are fat cats in limos, top hats, and whips beater their employees is just that. In the real world people are sacrificing their lives to build businesses and employ people and being thwarted by an "expanding government" and people that believe in fairy tale economics.
Small Businesses can apply for tax breaks of up to 35% of the cost of their employees premiums if they have fewer than 25 full-time employees. To qualify businesses must pay for at least 50 percent of their employees premiums and their workers annual salaries can't be more than $50k.
• Only Employers with over 50 employees are required to provide health insurance to their employees. If they choose not to they must pay a small tax. Employers who do provide health insurance will receive tax credits.
Originally posted by CoolStoryMan
it's now affecting my work,
a shipping company that normally delivers to small businesses like the one i work at are cutting off service and now only shipping straight to the big businesses.
It's small but is this corporate america protesting Obama?
ObamaCare Employer / Employee Taxes
Unless you own a company that makes over $250k in taxable profit or has over 50 employees you do not have to insure your employees. If you exceed these amounts you have to either insure your employees or pay a tax. Employers who do not meet these guidelines (97% of small businesses) will receive tax credits for insuring their employees.
In other words the ObamaCare taxes help small business employees and employers by offering them better health insurance and bigger tax breaks.
Businesses with 50 or more employees must provide health insurance or pay a penalty. If the business fails to comply, the penalty is $2,000 for each full-time employee (with a 30-employee deduction.) Additionally, if the coverage offered is too expensive (defined as costing more than 9.5 percent of the employee’s household income), the penalty is $3,000 per employee who must buy insurance with a government subsidy. However, only 200,000 small businesses will be affected by these changes because over 96 percent of small businesses fall below the 50-employee threshold.
Overall, the ACA brings a mixture of rules and benefits, but there is nothing to suggest that the healthcare shake up will hinder job creation and economic growth. In fact, it could inject order into the unruly medical marketplace if the administration explains benefits and requirements simply and clearly.
Employers are not up in arms over universal, affordable healthcare coverage either, says Widmer. A two year old study from Urban Institute revealed that concerns over employers dropping coverage or scaling back benefits because of health reform have not been realized. That’s a claim many Washington Republicans have made about ObamCare, saying it would cause U.S. small businesses to hold back on hiring because of mandated insurance laws. In Massachusetts, companies were never mandated to provide health insurance.