The Milky Way’s Black Hole Shoots Out Brightest Flare Ever

page: 3
35
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 06:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
Does anyone else see a connections here??

The black hole of the center of the galaxy is 26,000 light years away....


It takes 25,920 years for one great year of the zodiac to complete

We go through 1 degree every 72 years, 30 degrees every 2160 years for a total of 360 degrees.

This is why the ancients used a 360 day calendar, not a 365.25 day calendar. They kept track, to the day, of when something happens from the center of the galaxy.

According to the mayan calendar, using a 360 day calendar, we are currently really in the year 2087, when adjusted with our calendar, we get 2012.

2012 may be the end of the 13 baktun, but its also the end of the age of pisces, which is 2160 years long, its also the end of a great year, which is 25,920 years long.....

To me, this flare, is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy. The math is too much of a coincidence to ignore.


I love $hit like this! Whether it's accurate or not doesn't matter, it's questions and theories like this that really get my attention on this site. Big fat shining star for you




posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
It takes 25,920 years for one great year of the zodiac to complete

This is why the ancients used a 360 day calendar, not a 365.25 day calendar. They kept track, to the day, of when something happens from the center of the galaxy.
To me, this flare, is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy.



The zodiac cycle of 25920 years is caused by Axial precession and is only an effect on the rotation axis of the earth.

In other words, it has nothing whatsoever to do with "the galaxy", has no association with it, is not caused by it, and has no effect on it.
This same axial precession would occur even if the solar system was somehow transported to a different galaxy, or out the middle of nowhere where there is no galaxy at all.

The claim that it is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy has no foundation to support it.



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
It takes 25,920 years for one great year of the zodiac to complete

This is why the ancients used a 360 day calendar, not a 365.25 day calendar. They kept track, to the day, of when something happens from the center of the galaxy.
To me, this flare, is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy.



The zodiac cycle of 25920 years is caused by Axial precession and is only an effect on the rotation axis of the earth.

In other words, it has nothing whatsoever to do with "the galaxy", has no association with it, is not caused by it, and has no effect on it.
This same axial precession would occur even if the solar system was somehow transported to a different galaxy, or out the middle of nowhere where there is no galaxy at all.

The claim that it is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy has no foundation to support it.


Party pooper



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by OpenEars123
Party pooper


Sorry, I forgot to mention that the reason we have axial precession is so that the aliens who are in league with the freemasons can divert media attention away from the corrupt politician and bankers, so they can have secret meetings with the Bilderburgers in the underground tunnels, to organise the HAARP attacks on the population.
Then, the chemtrail jets can spray a manmade virus to activate the GMO's to give everyone brain cancer.
They will of course confirm this works by using secret cameras in your TVs and computer monitors. Anyone not affected gets put into the FEMA camp where they will have nothing to do except watch the stars circle overhead...

At least, thats what a top miltary insider told me.



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:24 PM
link   
So the Milky Way eats at the same Taco Bell I frequent. Interesting.



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alternative4u


I have been a telescope user for many years, this year I have seen many things going on in space that seem to have changed, eg the Moon is not in the same area of the sky as it was in Oct 2011, they have gone towards the east, they were towards the west after 8pm UK time in Oct to March.
I have been seeing on the internet that people are seeing changes, I fear the Mayan people could see this was to happen in 2012.

theextinctionprotocol.wordpress. com
(visit the link for the full news article)

But that is entirely normal. The moon does not have a year cycle like you think, so it will of course have changed from one year to the next.

I would not worry unless it was the sun and stars that changed position.
edit on 7-11-2012 by juleol because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by OpenEars123
Party pooper


Sorry, I forgot to mention that the reason we have axial precession is so that the aliens who are in league with the freemasons can divert media attention away from the corrupt politician and bankers, so they can have secret meetings with the Bilderburgers in the underground tunnels, to organise the HAARP attacks on the population.
Then, the chemtrail jets can spray a manmade virus to activate the GMO's to give everyone brain cancer.
They will of course confirm this works by using secret cameras in your TVs and computer monitors. Anyone not affected gets put into the FEMA camp where they will have nothing to do except watch the stars circle overhead...

At least, thats what a top miltary insider told me.


That's not true at all.

I am a NASA scientist and need to get the word out with my first post here on ATS that axial precession is a result of project bluebeam technology being by our reptilian overlords to broadcast subliminal messages with HAARP from their underground base in the hollow earth.

The TPTB and FEMA contracted with Monsanto to develop chemtrails so the sheeple cant see the mothership invasion fleet travelling between Niburu and the 5 mile tall alien moon towers.

That's the real reason they did 9/11. Osama Bin Laden had discovered the truth and was going to go public so the NWO had to frame him before he could give wikileaks proof that Dick Cheney and the Israeli's were all reptiles.

Its all explained by the electric universe theory, get your story straight.
edit on 7-11-2012 by Drunkenparrot because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by OpenEars123
Party pooper


Sorry, I forgot to mention that the reason we have axial precession is so that the aliens who are in league with the freemasons can divert media attention away from the corrupt politician and bankers, so they can have secret meetings with the Bilderburgers in the underground tunnels, to organise the HAARP attacks on the population.
Then, the chemtrail jets can spray a manmade virus to activate the GMO's to give everyone brain cancer.
They will of course confirm this works by using secret cameras in your TVs and computer monitors. Anyone not affected gets put into the FEMA camp where they will have nothing to do except watch the stars circle overhead...

At least, thats what a top miltary insider told me.


Yeah baby, now you have my interest! *spits chewing tobacco on cat and smiles a toothless grin*



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 08:24 PM
link   
i thought nothing could escape a black holes gravitational pull, including light.

but apparently x-ray's can.

so there is only one conclusion, this isn't a black hole.

another fact science claims is the reason light can't escape from a black hole is because the escape velocity of the black hole's gravitational pull is greater than the speed of light.

einstein said nothing can be faster than the speed of light, but here you have something that is.

the universe is strange as it is incredible and awe inspiring.



edit on 7-11-2012 by randomname because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 08:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
It takes 25,920 years for one great year of the zodiac to complete

This is why the ancients used a 360 day calendar, not a 365.25 day calendar. They kept track, to the day, of when something happens from the center of the galaxy.
To me, this flare, is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy.



The zodiac cycle of 25920 years is caused by Axial precession and is only an effect on the rotation axis of the earth.

In other words, it has nothing whatsoever to do with "the galaxy", has no association with it, is not caused by it, and has no effect on it.
This same axial precession would occur even if the solar system was somehow transported to a different galaxy, or out the middle of nowhere where there is no galaxy at all.

The claim that it is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy has no foundation to support it.


Its actually called the precession of the equinoxes, and yes, it absolutely has to do with the earth travelling around the galaxy... The earth has a wobble, which allows us to measure where we are in the galaxy by determining where we are among the constellations.... The pyramids of egypt were built with this in mind... In fact just about all of the ancients built some sort of monument to track this wobble, they placed a major significance on it. They knew it takes 25,920 years for the wobble to complete one full rotation. And when it did, they knew some major event occurs on the planet.... Even science agrees that the planet goes through major changes every 12,000 - 13,000 years. Something to do with the halfway point of the precession, and the complete rotation. It's talked about in religions as well, in things like the kali yuga...... It's something everyone back then knew about and tried building monuments that would last through the ages to tell future people about. So you cannot be so ignorant, and tell me that it means nothing. Do a little research, and you will be surprised at what you find.



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by LordSkanda
 


So you believe these jets are just release of stressed up aspects of Hawking's radiation. Thats what I myself think too.l I believe sometimes the rotation of the black hole mass releases this built up Hawking's radiation within it i.e. all the slow trapped minor virtual positive mass particles from the event horizon of that blackhole. These particles contribute to the evaporation of the blackhole. In this sense, Blackholes are finite afterall.

Thats not what he said. As matter gets closer to the gravity well of the singularity in the black hole, it doesn't just fall in. It goes into an orbit. That orbit is slowly pulled to the equator or the "accretion disc". There it slowly decays towards the center. As it does it moves faster and faster heating up through all the "known spectrums" until finally it disappears with a bang. We just saw one. The bang didn't come from the interior of the gravity well, it came from whatever went into it just before it went "into it".

A too simple analogy would be throwing a log onto a fire bed of coals. Or another too simple one might be like this:


Remember I said its too simple. The point being that the lava isn't burning, its the garbage in the lava that is burning. The reaction is from the incineration of the garbage.


Thanks



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by randomname
i thought nothing could escape a black holes gravitational pull, including light.

but apparently x-ray's can.

so there is only one conclusion, this isn't a black hole.


You are misunderstanding the mechanics, the x-ray jet is outside of the event horizon.

Sagittarius A is conclusively a super-massive black hole.



“Undoubtedly the most spectacular aspect of our 16-year study, is that it has delivered what is now considered to be the best empirical evidence that super-massive black holes do really exist,” Genzel continues. “The stellar orbits in the galactic centre show that the central mass concentration of four million solar masses must be a black hole, beyond any reasonable doubt.”


Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt: A Supermassive Black Hole Lives in Centre of Our Galaxy



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
Does anyone else see a connections here??

The black hole of the center of the galaxy is 26,000 light years away....


It takes 25,920 years for one great year of the zodiac to complete

We go through 1 degree every 72 years, 30 degrees every 2160 years for a total of 360 degrees.

This is why the ancients used a 360 day calendar, not a 365.25 day calendar. They kept track, to the day, of when something happens from the center of the galaxy.

According to the mayan calendar, using a 360 day calendar, we are currently really in the year 2087, when adjusted with our calendar, we get 2012.

2012 may be the end of the 13 baktun, but its also the end of the age of pisces, which is 2160 years long, its also the end of a great year, which is 25,920 years long.....

To me, this flare, is proof of some sort of alignment with the center of the galaxy. The math is too much of a coincidence to ignore.


The distance of the black hole to Earth has no effect on the cycle of anything happening in the black hole..



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
Its actually called the precession of the equinoxes...


If you'd bothered to read the link I posted, you'd find thats an old out of date historical term, no longer in use because of its non specific nature of not defining the various contributions to the total precession.




Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
...and yes, it absolutely has to do with the earth travelling around the galaxy... The earth has a wobble,


No, its does no such thing.
It has nothing to do with travelling around the galaxy, it only changes the direction that earth rotational axis points to. Its just a local "earth based" thing.
The precession changes the timings of the seasons, but does NOT change the directions of the various constellations at any given time of year. eg. Leo is in the direction of the sun in August, and 12000 sidereal years from now Leo will still be in the direction of the sun in August... just that the seasons will have changed.





Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
... which allows us to measure where we are in the galaxy by determining where we are among the constellations....


No, it does no such thing.
You make it sound like a navigational tool, like galactical GPS system.
Its not.
It doesnt measure "where we are" in any way at all.
Precession only changes (by a maximum of 46.8 degrees, but mostly a lot less) the relative directions of the constellations as seen from earth *with respect to the earths rotational axis* at any specific time of the year, and the timing of seasons.

The analogy of a wobbling top is useful. Imagine a top, spinning and wobbling on the table in front of you. Its precession doesnt in any way be defined by, or cause to be defined, the location of any of the other objects in your room.
The doorway is still the same direction from the top, at the same distance. The window is still the same direction from the top, at the same distance. The computer is still the same direction from the top, at the same distance.
Same with earth and the stars.
The only thing that changes is the direction from the spinning axis.

edit on 7-11-2012 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 09:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by MystiqueAgent
Huh interesting aren't the bigger they are the less "power" they are supposed to have technically? So now it makes me wonder on the jets and just how much material is in the horizon zone. Black Holes always a sense of mystery, awe, and dread with those things.


I'd think the power level would depend on the density?

I guess if it's larger, that means it wasn't dense enough to pull the matter in closer. so, it would work the other way around
edit on 11/7/12 by RedDragon because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 09:16 PM
link   
www.future-watch.org...


The Maya not only had their own method of measuring time but also a unique calendar system, which portrayed the fractality of time. The longest cycle in the Maya calendar is 26,000 years, which is the approximate length of a so-called ‘Platonic year’ or ‘Equinoctial cycle’. The Tibetans, ancient Egyptians, Cherokee and Hopi Indians also refer to such a cycle of 26,000 years in their mystical belief systems.



en.wikipedia.org...


Milankovitch theory describes the collective effects of changes in the Earth's movements upon its climate, named after Serbian geophysicist and astronomer Milutin Milanković, who worked on it during First World War internment. Milanković mathematically theorized that variations in eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession of the Earth's orbit determined climatic patterns on Earth through orbital forcing.

The Earth's axis completes one full cycle of precession approximately every 26,000 years.


so 26,000 tied to ancient mystical prophecy of a galactic alignment and this flare happening approximately 26,000 years ago seen earlier this year. supposing the ejection would not have been just light and that the light could have something coming behind it at a slower than light speed, giving it the extra time to reach earth by Dec 21st 2012.

so ive seen calculation and demonstrations showing our sun will align with the galactic plane.. does that mean that we'll be aligned to receive the ejection at full strength? that could be interesting.

or perhaps it'd flare up even huger while we're aligned... juicy.
edit on 7-11-2012 by 0mage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 09:47 PM
link   
Ok , correct me if i am wrong please, all we know about black holes is all so far a theory/ies. I will stick with jose Arguelles's theories until proven otherwise, each to their own , lsol



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 09:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by RedDragon

Originally posted by MystiqueAgent
Huh interesting aren't the bigger they are the less "power" they are supposed to have technically? So now it makes me wonder on the jets and just how much material is in the horizon zone. Black Holes always a sense of mystery, awe, and dread with those things.


I'd think the power level would depend on the density?

I guess if it's larger, that means it wasn't dense enough to pull the matter in closer. so, it would work the other way around
edit on 11/7/12 by RedDragon because: (no reason given)


Gravitational attraction depends on mass, and black holes can have different masses. The density, on the other hand, is always infinite (which is why it took so long for them to be accepted as real).

I'm pretty sure the "power" Mystique referred to was the gravitational gradient. Since gravitational attraction decreases by distance squared, an approaching object (say a spaceship) will feel more pull at the bow than at the stern. Normally a black hole has a really steep gradient, which results in the ship getting stretched out or "spaghettified". But a supermassive one has a shallower gradient, just because the event horizon is so much farther out from the singularity. So in that sense there's less power.



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 10:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by 0mage

supposing the ejection would not have been just light and that the light could have something coming behind it at a slower than light speed, giving it the extra time to reach earth by Dec 21st 2012.

so ive seen calculation and demonstrations showing our sun will align with the galactic plane.. does that mean that we'll be aligned to receive the ejection at full strength? that could be interesting.

or perhaps it'd flare up even huger while we're aligned... juicy.


The galactic axis of rotation is aligned roughly 90 degrees perpendicular to the galactic equator so if our solar system were in a position of crossing the galactic plain there is zero chance of something "juicy" happening (
) because the relativistic jet would be pointing in an entirely different direction.

Sorry, you cant have it both ways...





posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 10:11 PM
link   
I am interseted now to see if there have been or will be any strangeness as such with our sun, any connection , lsol





new topics
top topics
 
35
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join